This essay explores three case studies that illustrate the exemplary use of economic analysis in environmental decision-making. These include: 1) the creation of a market in tradable grazing rights in the American West; 2) a cost analysis that facilitated a negotiated rulemaking at a power plant in Arizona; and 3) a conception of production-based pollution allowances that led to an agreement for regulating Intel microprocessor production plants. The paper argues that cost–benefit analysis may be less useful than other kinds of economic analysis that can guide and inform rather than judge and second-guess the outcome of negotiated and collaborative decision-making.
AbbyEdward1986. ‘Even the Bad Guys Wear White Hats’, Harper's, Jan.: 51–55.
2.
ArrowKenneth J., CropperMaureen L., EadsGeorge C., HahnRobert W., LaveLester B., NollRoger G., PortneyPaul R., RussellMilton, SchmalenseeRichard, SmithV. Kerry, and StavinsRobert N.1996. ‘Is There a Role for Benefit–Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?’ Science272 (April 12): 221–222.
3.
BergmanSteven H.1994. ‘To See or Not to See: The Viability of Visibility at the Grand Canyon’. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 13: 127–180
4.
BoydJames, KrupnickAlan J., and MazurekJanice1998. ‘Intel's XL Permit: A Framework for Evaluation’, Discussion Paper, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
5.
ClaussenEileen and LisaMcNeilly1998. ‘Equity and Global Climate Change: The Complex Elements of Global Fairness’. Pew Center on Global Climate change. October 29, 1998. Washington, DC. Available on-line at: http://www.pewclimate.org/report2.html.
CoaseR. H. ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937). The Nature of the Firm, ed. WilliamsonO. E. and WinterS. G.. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 18–33
8.
Decision Focus Incorporated1990. Development and Design of a Contingent Valuation Survey Measuring the Public's Value for Visibility Improvements at the Grand Canyon National Park. Sept. Los Altos, CA: DFI.
9.
Decision Focus Incorporated1991. Salt River Project, Navajo Generating Station BART Analysis, Prepared by. Los Altos, CA, DFI
10.
DeckLeland1997. ‘Visibility at the Grand Canyon and the Navajo Generating Station’, in MorgensternRichard D., (Ed.), Economic Analysis at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact, Washington, DC: Resources of the Future, pp. 267–301.
11.
DonnahueDebra1999. The Western Range Revisited: Removing Livestock from the Public Range to Conserve Native Biodiversity, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
12.
DorfMichael and SabelCharles F.1998. ‘A Constitution of Democratic Experimental-ism’, Columbia Law Review98 (2) (March): 267–473.
13.
DruckerPeter1996. Post-Industrial Society. New York: Harper Paperback.
14.
FieldBarry C.1997. Environmental Economics: An Introduction. New York: McGraw Hill, 2nd edn.
15.
ForemanDave1995. ‘Around the Campfire’, Wild Earth5 (Fall): 2–3.
16.
FreemanJody1997. ‘Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State’, UCLA Law Review45 (Oct.): 1–98.
17.
GardnerB. Delworth 1963. ‘A Proposal to Reduce Misallocation of Livestock Grazing Permits’. Journal of Farm Economics45: 109–128.
18.
GundlingE.2002. The 3M Way to Innovation: Balancing People and Profit. Tokyo: Kodansha.
19.
HessKarlJr., and WaldJohanna H.1995. ‘Grazing Reform: Here's the Answer’. High Country News. Oct. 2, p. 14.
20.
HinchmanSteve1993. ‘The Blurring of the West’, High Country News, 25(12)(June): 1ff.
21.
HolechekJerry L.1993. ‘Policy Changes on Federal Rangelands: A Perspective’. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, May–June.1
22.
Intel Corporation1994. Comments by Intel Corporation presented by J. Hatcher, Counsel, before the Environmental Protection Agency, 28 September.
23.
KarkkainenBardley C.2001. ‘Information as Environmental Regulation: TRI and Performance Benchmarking, Precursor to a New Paradigm?’ Georgetown Law Journal89 (January): 257–370.
KerrAndy1998. ‘The Voluntary Retirement Option for Federal Public Land Grazing Permittees’, Wild Earth8(3) (Fall): 63–67.
26.
LeonardHerman B. and ZeckhauserRichard J.1986. ‘Cost–Benefit Analysis Applied to Risks: Its Philosophy and Legitmacy’, in MacLeanDouglas (Ed.), Values at Risk, pp. 31–48. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Allanheld.
27.
LivermoreDave1996. ‘Director's Report: Cows vs. Condos’, Basin, Rangem and Rimrock 2 (Fall) (Newsletter of the Nature Conservancy of Utah).
28.
ManningRichard1995. Grassland: The History, Biology, Politics, and Promise of the American Prairie, New York: Viking.
29.
MarcusAlfred A., GeffenDonald A., and SextonKen2002. Reinventing Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Project XL.Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
30.
MartinWilliam E.1994. ‘Mitigating the Economic Impacts of Agency Programs for Public Rangelands’. In National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences, Developing Strategies for Rangeland Management. Washington DC: NRC-NAS.
31.
MCTC (Microelectronics Computer Technology Corporation)1993. Environmental Consciousness: A Strategic Competitiveness Issue for the Electronics and Computer Industry. Austin, TX: MCTC.
32.
MeadWalter J.1993. ‘Review and Analysis of State-of-the-Art Contingent Valuation Studies’. In HausmanJerry A. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. New York: North-Holland.
33.
MilgromPaul1993. ‘Is Sympathy an Economic Value? Philosophy, Economics, and The Contingent Valuation Method’ in HausmanJ. A. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 417–35Amsterdam: North-Holland
34.
National Research Council1993. Committee on Haze in National Parks and Wilderness Areas. Protecting Visibility in National Parks and Wilderness Areas. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
35.
NelsonRobert H.1997. ‘How to Reform Grazing Policy: Creating Forage Rights on Federal Rangelands’, Fordham Environmental Law Journal8: 645–690.
RappoportD. Michael and CooneyJohn1994. ‘Visibility at the Grand Canyon: Regulatory Negotiations Under the Clean Air Act’. Arizona State Law Journal24: 627–642.
38.
RoweRobert D., and ChestnutLauraine G. (Eds.) 1983. Managing Air Quality And Scenic Resources At National Parks And Wilderness AreasBoulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
39.
RoweRobert D., and ChestnutLauraine G.1982. The Value Of Visibility: Theory and Application. Cambridge, Mass.: Abt Books.
