Is Valuing Nature Contributing to Policy Development?

Abstract

This paper examines technical, ethical and ecological science perspectives on environmental valuation, and discusses problems in terms of the implications for practical policy-making. It suggests that all these perspectives raise legitimate concerns about the use of stated preference methods, but concludes that such methods still have a role to play in policy making for nature conservation provided they are applied in the right circumstances, designed very carefully, and used in conjunction with other decision-making tools.

Keywords

Nature biodiversity valuation ecosystem functions cost-benefit

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bowers

1999/2000. ‘Taken on the Flood. The New Project Appraisal Guidelines for Flood Defence’, Ecos 20 (3/4): 61–9.

CAG/Land Use Consultants 1997. Environmental Capital: A Provisional Guide.

Clark

Burgess

and Harrison

2000. ‘“I struggled with this money business” - Respondents' Perspectives on Contingent Valuation’, Ecological Economics 33 (1): 45–62.

Daily

Gretchen C.

(ed.) 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Local Ecosystems. Covelo, CA: Island Press.

De Groot , Rudolf

1992. The Functions of Nature: Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation Management and Decision Making. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff

DETR 1998. A New Deal for Trunk Roads in England: Guidance on the New Approach to Transport Appraisal.

Green

1997. Are Blue Whales Really Simply Very Large Cups of Coffee? Middlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre.

Haines-Young

1999. Environmental Accounts for Nature Conservation. English Nature Research Report No. 355.

Jacobs

1997. 'Environmental Valuation, Deliberative Democracy and Public Decision-Making Institutions'. In John Foster (ed.) Valuing Nature. London: Routledge.

10.

Gregoire

D.C.

Sturgeon

R.E.

Limburg

and Folke

1999. ‘The Ecology of Ecosystem Services: Introduction’, Ecological Economics 29 (2): 179–82.

11.

MAFF 1999, 2000. Flood and Coastal Defence Project Appraisal Guidance, Volumes 3, 5. London: MAFF Publications.

12.

Martinez-Alier

Munda

and O'Neill

1998. ‘Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecology and Economics’, Ecological Economics 26 (3): 277–86.

13.

Norton

Bryan

1992. ‘Sustainability, Human Welfare and Ecosystem Health’, Environmental Values 1: 97–111.

14.

Pearce

1999. Presentation to the Chartered Institute of Water and Environmental Management on Valuing the Environment.

15.

Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) 1998. Contingent Valuation. Discussion Paper.

16.

Spash

C. L.

1988. ‘Investigating Individual Motives for Environmental Action’, Journal of Environmental Management 50 (4): 403–16.

17.

Turner

R.K.

Brouwer

and Georgion

2000. Ecosystem Functions and the Implications for Environmental Valuation. English Nature, in press.