We propose a test for assessing nonlinear dose-response models based on a Crámer–von Mises statistic. We establish the asymptotic distribution of the test and demonstrate that the test can detect the local alternative converging to the null at the parametric rate . We provide a bootstrap resampling technique to calculate the critical values. It is observed that the test has good power performance in small sample sizes. We apply the proposed method to analyze 250 datasets from a pharmacologic study and conduct two small simulation experiments to explore the numerical performance of the proposed test and compare one commonly used test in practice.
FinneyDJ.Statistical method in biological assay.
London:
Charles Griffin & Co., Ltd., 1964.
2.
RitzCJensenSMGerhardD, et al. Dose-response analysis using R.
Boca Raton, FL:
Chapman & Hall/CRC The R Series, 2019.
3.
HamiltonMARussoRCThurstonRV.Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ Sci Technol1977;
11: 714–719.
BatesDMWattsDB.Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications.
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1988.
11.
HuangY.Interval estimation of the ED50 when a logistic dose-response curve is incorrectly assumed. Comput Stat Data Anal2001;
36: 525–537.
12.
Di VeroliGYFornariCGoldlustI, et al.
An automated fitting procedure and software for dose-response curves with multiphasic features.Sci Rep2015;
5: 14701.
13.
RitzCMartinussenT.Lack-of-fit tests for assessing mean structures for continuous dose-response data. Environ Ecol Stat2011;
18: 349–366.
14.
NeillJW.Testing for lack of fit in nonlinear regression. Ann Stat1988;
16: 733–740.
15.
StephensMA.EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc1974;
69: 730–737.
16.
AndersonTWDarlingDA.Asymptotic theory of certain goodness of fit criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann Math Stat1952;
23: 193–212.
17.
LinDWeiLYingZ.Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals.Biometrics2002;
58: 1–12.
HärdleWMammenE.Testing parametric versus nonparametric regression.Ann Stat1993;
21: 1926–1947.
20.
van der VaartAWWellnerJA.Weak convergence and empirical processes. Springer series in statistics.
New York:
Springer-Verlag, 1996.
21.
BarretinaJCaponigroGStranskyN, et al.
The cancer cell line encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity.Nature2012;
483: 603–607.
22.
Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia Consortium; Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer Consortium.Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets. Nature2015;
528: 84.
23.
RickettsJHHeadGA.A five-parameter logistic equation for investigating asymmetry of curvature in baroreflex studies.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol1999;
277: R441–R454.
24.
SheatherSJJonesMC.A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J R Stat Soc Ser B1991;
53: 683–690.
25.
FanJGijbelsI.Local polynomial modelling and its applications. Monographs on statistics and applied probability.
Boca Raton:
Chapman & Hall, 2003.
26.
EmmensCW.Principles of biological assay.
Boca Raton:
Chapman & Hall, 1948.
27.
WijesinhaMCPiantadosiS.Dose-response models with covariates.Biometrics1995;
51: 977–987.
28.
BellmanRE.Adaptive control processes: a guided tour.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 2015.
29.
TanFZhuXZhuL.A projection-based adaptive-to-model test for regressions. Stat Sin2018;
28: 157–188.
30.
JennrichRI.Asymptotic properties of non-linear least squares estimators. Ann Math Stat1969;
40: 633–643.
31.
KosorokM.Introduction to empirical processes and semiparametric inference.
New York:
Springer-Verlag, 2008.
