The estimation of hidden sub-populations is a hard task that appears in many fields. For example, public health planning in Brazil depends crucially of the number of people who holds a private health insurance plan and hence rarely uses the public services. Different sources of information about these sub-populations may be available at different geographical levels. The available information can be transferred between these different geographic levels to improve the estimation of the hidden population size. In this study, we propose a model that use individual level information to learn about the dependence between the response variable and explanatory variables by proposing a family of link functions with asymptotes that are flexible enough to represent the real aspects of the data and robust to departures from the model. We use the fitted model to estimate the size of the sub-population at any desired level. We illustrate our methodology estimating the sub-population that uses the public health system in each neighborhood of large cities in Brazil.
KishL.
A taxonomy of elusive populations. J Off Stat1991;
7: 340–347.
2.
HeckathornDD.
Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Prob1997;
44: 174–199.
3.
SudmanSSirkenMGCowanCD.
Sampling rare and elusive populations. Science1988;
240: 991–996.
4.
ScharpingT.
Hide-and-seek: China’s elusive population data. China Econ Rev2001;
12: 323–332.
5.
PratesiMRoccoE.
Centre sampling for estimating elusive population size. Statistica2002;
62: 745–757.
6.
BergS. Snowball sampling – I, Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, vol. 12.
Hoboken:
John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
7.
Gjoka M, Kurant M, Butts CT, et al. Walking in Facebook: A case study of unbiased sampling of OSNS. In: INFOCOM, proceedings IEEE (pp. 1–9). Piscataway: IEEE, 2010.
8.
BaltarFBrunetI.
Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Res2012;
22: 57–74.
9.
BanksSPiggottMPHansenBD, et al.
Wombat coprogenetics: enumerating a common wombat population by microsatellite analysis of faecal DNA. Aust J Zool2002;
50: 193–204.
10.
EggertLSEggertJAWoodruffDS.
Estimating population sizes for elusive animals: the forest elephants of Kakum National Park, Ghana. Mol Ecol2003;
12: 1389–1402.
11.
MillerCRJoycePWaitsLP.
A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark–recapture data. Mol Ecol2005;
14: 1991–2005.
12.
BrugalMTDomingo-SalvanyAMaguireA, et al.
A small area analysis estimating the prevalence of addiction to opioids in Barcelona, 1993. J Epidemiol Commun Health1999;
53: 488–494.
13.
HsiehYHChenCWSLeeSM.
Empirical Bayes approach to estimating the number of HIV-infected individuals in hidden and elusive populations. Stat Med2000;
19: 3095–3108.
14.
AaronDJChangYFMarkovicN, et al.
Estimating the lesbian population: a capture-recapture approach. J Epidemiol Commun Health2003;
57: 207–209.
15.
SalganikMJFazitoDBertoniN, et al.
Assessing network scale-up estimates for groups most at risk of HIV/AIDS: evidence from a multiple-method study of heavy drug users in Curitiba, Brazil. Am J Epidemiol2011;
174: 1190–1196.
16.
ToledoLCodeçoCTBertoniN, et al.
Putting respondent-driven sampling on the map: insights from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2011;
57: S136–S143.
17.
FeehanDMSalganikMJ.
Generalizing the network scale-up method: a new estimator for the size of hidden populations. Sociol Methodol2016;
46: 153–186.
18.
JohnstonLGMcLaughlinKRRouhaniSA, et al.
Measuring a hidden population: a novel technique to estimate the population size of women with sexual violence-related pregnancies in South Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. J Epidemiol Global Health2017;
7: 45–53.
19.
CrawfordFWWuJHeimerR.
Hidden population size estimation from respondent-driven sampling: a network approach. J Am Stat Assoc2018;
113: 755–766.
20.
CarvalhoOMeiraWJrPratesM, et al.
Infosas: um sistema de mineração de dados para controle da produção do sus. Revista do TCU2016;
137: 52–59.
21.
MassudaAHoneTLelesFAG, et al.
The Brazilian health system at crossroads: progress, crisis and resilience. BMJ Global Health2018;
3: e000829.
22.
NelderJWedderburnR.
Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser A1972;
135: 370–384.
23.
MurphyKP. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective.
Cambridge:
The MIT Press, 2012.
24.
NaglerJ.
Scobit: an alternative estimator to logit and probit. Am J Polit Sci1994;
38: 230–255.
25.
ChenMHDeyDShaoQM.
A new skewed link model for dichotomous quantal response data. J Am Stat Assoc1999;
94: 1172–1186.
26.
BazánJLBolfarineHBrancoMD.
A framework for skew-probit links in binary regression. Commun Stat Theory Methods2010;
39: 678–697.
27.
JiangXDeyDKPrunierR, et al.
A new class of flexible link functions with application to species co-occurrence in cape floristic region. Ann Appl Stat2013;
7: 2180–2204.
LiDWangXLinL, et al.
Flexible link functions in nonparametric binary regression with Gaussian process priors. Biometrics2016;
72: 707–719.
30.
Birnbaum A. Some latent trait models and their use in inferring and examinee's ability. In: Loed FM, Lord MR (eds), Novick, statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Mass. Addison Wesley, 1968, pp.17--20.
31.
BartonMALordFM.
An upper asymptote for the three-parameter logistic item-response model. ETS Res Rep Ser1981;
1981: i–8.
32.
FernándezCSteelMF.
On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. J Am Stat Assoc1998;
93: 359–371.
33.
CongdonP. Bayesian models for categorical data.
Hoboken:
John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
34.
CabralCRBLachosVHMadrugaMR.
Bayesian analysis of skew-normal independent linear mixed models with heterogeneity in the random-effects population. J Stat Plan Inference2012;
142: 181–200.
35.
GarayAMBolfarineHLachosVH, et al.
Bayesian analysis of censored linear regression models with scale mixtures of normal distributions. J Appl Stat2015;
42: 2694–2714.
36.
GilksWRBestNGTanK.
Adaptive rejection metropolis sampling within Gibbs sampling. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat)1995;
44: 455–472.
37.
MetropolisNRosenbluthAWRosenbluthMN, et al.
Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys1953;
21: 1087–1092.
38.
HastingsWK.
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika1970;
57: 97–109.
39.
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Brazil Demographic Census 2010. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), 2012.
40.
WatanabeS.
Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. J Mach Learn Res2010;
11: 3571–3594.
