In this work, we study upper-sided cumulative sum control charts that are suitable for monitoring geometrically inflated Poisson processes. We assume that a process is properly described by a two-parameter extension of the zero-inflated Poisson distribution, which can be used for modeling count data with an excessive number of zero and non-zero values. Two different upper-sided cumulative sum-type schemes are considered, both suitable for the detection of increasing shifts in the average of the process. Aspects of their statistical design are discussed and their performance is compared under various out-of-control situations. Changes in both parameters of the process are considered. Finally, the monitoring of the monthly cases of poliomyelitis in the USA is given as an illustrative example.
XieMGohTN. SPC of a near zero-defect process subject to random shocks. Qual Reliab Eng Int1993; 9: 89–93.
2.
XieMHeBGohTN. Zero-inflated Poisson model in statistical process control. Comput Stat Data Anal2001; 38: 191–201.
3.
LambertD. Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics1992; 34: 1–14.
4.
GuptaPLGuptaRCTripathiRC. Analysis of zero-adjusted count data. Comput Stat Data Anal1996; 23: 207–218.
5.
BohningDDietzESchlattmannPet al.The zero-inflated Poisson model and the decayed, missing and filled teeth index in dental epidemiology. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A1999; 162: 195–209.
6.
JansakulNHindeJP. Score test for zero-inflated Poisson models. Comput Stat Data Anal2002; 40: 75–96.
7.
BaeSJHwangJYKuoW. Yield prediction via spatial modeling of clustered defect counts across a wafer map. IIE Trans2007; 39: 1073–1083.
8.
SimCHLimMH. Attribute charts for zero-inflated processes. Commun Stat Simul Comput2008; 37: 1440–1452.
HeSHuangWWoodallWH. CUSUM chart for monitoring a zero-inflated Poisson process. Qual Reliab Eng Int2012; 28: 181–192.
11.
HuangLZhengDZalkikarJet al.Zero-inflated poisson model based likelihood ratio test for drug safety signal detection. Stat Methods Med Res2017; 26: 471–488.
12.
YonedaK. Estimations in some modified Poisson distributions. Yokohama Math J1962; 10: 73–96.
13.
PadneyKN. Generalized inflated Poisson distribution. J Sci Res Banaraes Hindu Univ1964–1965; XV: 157–162.
14.
MelkerssonMRoothD-O. Modeling female fertility using inflated count data models. J Popul Econ2000; 13: 189–203.
15.
BegumAMallickAPalN. A generalized inflated Poisson distribution with application to modeling fertility data. Thailand Stat2014; 12: 135–139.
16.
LinTHTsaiM-H. Modeling health survey data with excessive zero and K responses. Stat Med2013; 32: 1572–1583.
17.
LinTHTsaiM-H. Model selection criteria for dual-inflated data. J Stat Comput Simul2016; 86: 2663–2672.
18.
RakitzisACCastagliolaPMaravelakis. A two-parameter general inflated Poisson distribution: properties and applications. Stat Methodol2016; 29: 32–50.
19.
RakitzisACCastagliolaPMaravelakisPE. On the modelling and monitoring of general inflated Poisson processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int2016; 32: 1837–1851.
20.
JohnsonNLKempAWKotzS. Univariate discrete distributions20053rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
21.
HawkinsDMOlwellDH. Cumulative sum charts and charting for quality improvement19981st ed. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.
22.
WeißCHTestikMC. Detection of abrupt changes in count data time series: cumulative sum derivations for INARCH(1) models. J Qual Technol2012; 44: 249–264.
23.
ChenNZhouSChangT-Set al.Attribute control charts using generalized zero-inflated Poisson distribution. Qual Reliab Eng Int2008; 24: 793–806.
24.
SaghirALinZ. Cumulative sum charts for monitoring the COM-Poisson processes. Comput Indus Eng2014; 68: 65–77.
25.
LucasJMCrosierRB. Fast initial response for CUSUM quality control schemes. Technometrics1982; 24: 199–205.
26.
NeutsMF. Matrix–geometric solutions in stochastic models an algorithmic approach, New York, USA: Dover Publications Inc, 1981.
27.
LatoucheGRamaswamiV. Introduction to matrix analytic methods in stochastic modelling, ASA SIAM: 3600 University City, Science Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-2688, USA, 1999.
28.
BrookDEvansDA. An approach to the probability distribution of CUSUM run length. Biometrika1972; 59: 539–549.
29.
LucasJM. Counted data CUSUMs. Technometrics1985; 27: 129–144.
30.
GanFF. An optimal design of CUSUM control charts for binomial counts. J Appl Stat1993; 20: 445–460.
31.
RakitzisACMaravelakisPECastagliolaP. CUSUM control charts for the monitoring of zero-inflated binomial processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int2016; 32: 465–483.
32.
BorrorCMChampCWRigdonSE. Poisson EWMA control charts. J Qual Technol1998; 30: 352–361.
33.
HeSLiSHeZ. A combination of CUSUM charts for monitoring a zero-inflated Poisson process. Commun Stat Simul Comput2014; 43: 2482–2497.
34.
ChengSSYuF-J. Run length distribution of CUSUM control schemes for negative binomial processes. Qual Technol Quant Manage2015; 12: 233–249.
35.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014.
36.
CastagliolaPMaravelakisPE. A CUSUM control chart for monitoring the variance when parameters are estimated. J Stat Plann Infer2011; 141: 1463–1478.
37.
HohleMPaulM. Count data regression chart for the monitoring of surveillance time series. Comput Stat Data Anal2008; 52: 4357–4368.
38.
ShuLJiangWTsuiK-L. A comparison of weighted CUSUM procedures that account for monotone changes in population size. Stat Med2011; 30: 725–741.
39.
JiangWShuLZhaoHet al.Cusum procedures for health care surveillance. Qual Reliab Eng Int2013; 29: 883–897.
40.
AlencarAPHoLLAlbarracinOYE. CUSUM control charts to monitor series of negative binomial count data. Stat Methods Med Res2017; 26: 1925–1935.
41.
JensenWAJones-FarmerLAChampCWWoodallWH. Effects of parameter estimation on control chart properties: a literature review. J Qual Technol2006; 38: 349–364.
