Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-2
Modelling the distribution of health-related quality of life of advanced melanoma patients in a longitudinal multi-centre clinical trial using M-quantile random effects regression
Health-related quality of life assessment is important in the clinical evaluation of patients with metastatic disease that may offer useful information in understanding the clinical effectiveness of a treatment. To assess if a set of explicative variables impacts on the health-related quality of life, regression models are routinely adopted. However, the interest of researchers may be focussed on modelling other parts (e.g. quantiles) of this conditional distribution. In this paper, we present an approach based on quantile and M-quantile regression to achieve this goal. We applied the methodologies to a prospective, randomized, multi-centre clinical trial. In order to take into account the hierarchical nature of the data we extended the M-quantile regression model to a three-level random effects specification and estimated it by maximum likelihood.
LocalioARBerlinJATen HaveTR. Adjustments for Center in Multicenter Studies: an overview. Ann Int Med2001; 135: 112–123.
2.
GuthrieLOkenESterneJet al.Ongoing monitoring of data clustering in multicenter studies. BMC Med Res Methodol2012; 12.
3.
SakamotoJMatsuyamaYOhashiY. An analysis of institutional effects in a multicenter cancer clinical trial: is it also plausible from the clinicians’ point of view?Jpn J Clin Oncol1999; 29: 403–405.
4.
YamaguchiTOhashiYMatsuyamaY. Proportional hazards models with random effects to examine centre effects in multicentre cancer clinical trials. Stat Meth Med Res2002; 11: 221–236.
5.
GoldsteinH. Multilevel statistical models, New York: Wiley, 2003.
6.
FaircloughDL. Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials, Chapman & Hall/CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2002.
KoenkerR. Quantile regression, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
9.
CareyVJYongFHFrenkelLMet al.Growth velocity assessment in paediatric AIDS: smoothing, penalized quantile regression and the definition of growth failure. Stat Med2004; 23: 509–526.
10.
AustinPCTuJVDalyPAet al.The use of quantile regression in health care research: a case study examining gender differences in the timeliness of thrombolytic therapy. Stat Med2005; 24: 791–816.
11.
WeiYPereAKoenkerRet al.Quantile regression methods for reference growth charts. Stat Med2006; 25: 1369–1382.
12.
GeraciMBottaiM. Quantile regression for longitudinal data using the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Biostatistics2007; 8: 140–154.
13.
BottaiMCaiBMcKeownRE. Logistic quantile regression for bounded outcomes. Stat Med2010; 29: 309–317.
14.
LiYGraubardBIKornEL. Application of nonparametric quantile regression to body mass index percentile curves from survey data. Stat Med2010; 29: 558–572.
15.
NicholsonWSetseRHill-BriggsFet al.Depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol2006; 107: 798–806.
16.
PourhoseingholiMASafaeeAMoghimi-DehkordiBet al.Quality of life in breast cancer patients – a quantile regression analysis. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevent2008; 9: 487–490.
17.
BroccoliSCavriniGZoliM. A quantile regression approach to the analysis of the quality of life determinants in the elderly. Statistica2005; 65: 419–436.
18.
GeraciMBottaiM. Linear quantile mixed models. Stat Comput2014; 24: 461–479.
NeweyWKPowellJL. Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica1987; 55: 819–847.
21.
HuberP. Robust statistics, New York: Wiley, 1981.
22.
TzavidisNSalvatiNSchmidTet al.Longitudinal analysis of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire scores of the Millennium Cohort Study children in England using M-quantile random effects regression. J R Stat Soc: Ser A2016; 179: 427–452.
23.
JonesMC. Expectiles and M-quantiles are quantiles. Stat Prob Lett1994; 20: 149–153.
24.
RidolfiRChiarion-SileniVGuidaMet al.Cisplatin, dacarbazine with or without subcutaneous interleukin-2, and interferon alpha-2b in advanced melanoma outpatients: results from an Italian multicenter phase III randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol2002; 20: 1600–1607.
25.
Chiarion-SileniVDel BiancoPDe SalvoGLet al.Quality of life evaluation in a randomised trial of chemotherapy versus bio-chemotherapy in advanced melanoma patients. Eur J Cancer2003; 39: 1577–1585.
26.
HarvilleDA. Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J Am Stat Assoc1977; 72: 320–338.
27.
RichardsonAMWelshAH. Robust restricted maximum likelihood in mixed linear models. Biometrics1995; 51: 1429–1439.
28.
HugginsRM. A robust approach to the analysis of repeated measures. Biometrics1993; 49: 715–720.
29.
RichardsonAM. Bounded influence estimation in the mixed linear model. J Am Stat Assoc1997; 92: 154–161.
30.
HugginsRMLoeschDZ. On the analysis of mixed longitudinal growth data. Biometrics1998; 54: 583–595.
31.
SinhaSKRaoJNK. Robust small area estimation. Can J Stat2009; 37: 381–399.
32.
AndersonTW. Asymptotically efficient estimation of covariance matrices with linear structure. Ann Stat1973; 1: 135–141.
33.
StaudenmayerJLakeEWandM. Robustness for general design mixed models using the t-distribution. Stat Model2009; 9: 235–255.
34.
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, www.R-project.org (2011, accessed 19 February 2016).
35.
le CessieSde VriesEGEBuijsCet al.Analyzing longitudinal data with patients in different disease states during follow-up and death as final state. Stat Med2009; 28: 3829–3843.
36.
LittleRJARubinDB. Statistical analysis with missing data, New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002.
37.
LipsitzSRFitzmauriceGMMolenberghsGet al.Quantile regression methods for longitudinal data with drop-outs: application to CD4 cell counts of patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. J R Stat Soc: Ser C1997; 46: 463–476.
38.
YiGYHeW. Median regression models for longitudinal data with dropouts. Biometrics2009; 65: 618–625.
39.
RobinsJMRotnitzkyAZhaoLP. Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data. J Am Stat Assoc1995; 90: 106–121.
40.
PfeffermannDSkinnerCJHolmesDJet al.Weighting for unequal selection probabilities in multilevel models. J R Stat Soc: Ser B1998; 60: 23–40.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
