Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Under covariate adaptive randomization, the covariate is tied to both randomization and analysis. Misclassification of such covariate will impact the intended treatment assignment; further, it is unclear what the appropriate analysis strategy should be. We explore the impact of such misclassification on the trial’s statistical operating characteristics. Simulation scenarios were created based on the misclassification rate and the covariate effect on the outcome. Models including unadjusted, adjusted for the misclassified, or adjusted for the corrected covariate were compared using logistic regression for a binary outcome and Poisson regression for a count outcome. For the binary outcome using logistic regression, type I error can be maintained in the adjusted model, but the test is conservative using an unadjusted model. Power decreased with both increasing covariate effect on the outcome as well as the misclassification rate. Treatment effect estimates were biased towards the null for both the misclassified and unadjusted models. For the count outcome using a Poisson model, covariate misclassification led to inflated type I error probabilities and reduced power in the misclassified and the unadjusted model. The impact of covariate misclassification under covariate–adaptive randomization differs depending on the underlying distribution of the outcome.

Keywords

Covariate–adaptive randomization generalized linear regression covariate misclassification

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Thall

Wathen

. Covariate-adjusted adaptive randomization in a sarcoma trial with multi-stage treatments. Stat Med 2005; 24: 1947–1964.

Krag

Anderson

Julian

et al.

Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: Overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 927–933.

Atagi

Kawahara

Yokoyama

et al.

Thoracic radiotherapy with or without daily low-dose carboplatin in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG0301). Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 671–678.

Sherrington

Lord

Vogler

et al.

A post-hospital home exercise program improved mobility but increased falls in older people: A randomised controlled trial. PloS ONE 2014; 9: e104412–e104412.

Ellis

Letendre

Vaida

et al.

Randomized trial of central nervous system-targeted antiretrovirals for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58: 1015–1022.

Ybarra

Holtrop

Prescott

et al.

Pilot RCT results of stop my smoking USA: a text messaging-based smoking cessation program for young adults. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15: 1388–1399.

Ersek

Polissar

Pen

et al.

Addressing methodological challenges in implementing the nursing home pain management algorithm randomized controlled trial. Clin Trials 2012; 9: 634–644.

Weir

Lees

. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial. Stat Med 2003; 22: 705–726.

Kundt

. Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 129–134.

10.

. Asymptotic properties of covariate–adaptive randomization. Ann Stat 2012; 40: 1794–1815.

11.

Shao

. Validity of tests under covariate–adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models. Biometrics 2013; 69: 960–969.

12.

Joseph Broderick UoC. Interventional management of stroke trial (IMS III): A phase III clinical trial examining whether a combined intravenous (IV) and intra-arterial (IA) approach to recanalization is superior to standard IV Rt-PA (Activase®) alone, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00359424 NLM Identifier: NCT00359424.

13.

David Wright EU. Phase 3 Clinical trial to determine if progesterone along with standard medical care for brain injury is more effective at limiting the amount of damage cause by a traumatic brain injury than standard medical care alone, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00822900 NLM Identifier: NCT00822900.

14.

Luo S, et al. Binomial regression with a misclassified covariate and outcome. Stat Methods Med Res 2016; 25: 101–117.

15.

Greenland

. The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 112: 564–569.

16.

Flegal

Brownie

Haas

. The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123: 736–751.

17.

Reade-Christopher

Kupper

. Effects of exposure misclassification on regression analyses of epidemiologic follow-up study data. Biometrics 1991; 47: 535–548.

18.

Spiegelman

Rosner

Logan

. Estimation and inference for logistic regression with covariate misclassification and measurement error in main study/validation study designs. J Am Stat Assoc 2000; 95: 51–61.

19.

John

MNN

Jewell

. A geometric approach to assess bias due to omitted covariates in generalized linear models. Biometrika 1993; 80: 807–815.

20.

Robinson

Jewell

. Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. Int Stat Rev 1991; 59: 227–240.

21.

Gail

Wieand

Piantadosi

. Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates. Biometrika 1984; 71: 431–431.

22.

Efron

. Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika 1971; 58: 403–417.

23.

Matts

Lachin

. Properties of permuted-block randomization in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1988; 9: 327–344.

24.

Smith

. Properties of biased coin designs in sequential. Ann Stat 1984; 12: 1018–1034.

25.

Zelen

. The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trials. J Chronic Dis 1974; 27: 365–375.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.57 MB

The impact of covariate misclassification using generalized linear regression under covariate–adaptive randomization

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material