Observational data sets offer many potential advantages for medical research including their low cost, large size and generalisability. Because they are collected for clinical care and health care operations purposes, observational data sets have some limitations that must be considered in order to perform useful analyses. Sensible use of observational data sets can yield valuable insights, particularly when clinical trials are impractical.
StromBLMelmonKLThe use of pharmacoepidemiology to study beneficial drug effects. In: StromBL (ed.) Pharmacoepidemiology , 3rd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2000, pp. 553–572.
2.
AyanianJZ. Using administrative data to assess health care outcomes. Eur Heart J1999; 20: 1689–1691.
3.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research , Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.
4.
TangPCRalstonMArrigottiMFQureshiLGrahamJ. Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc2007; 14: 10–15.
5.
JollisJGAncukiewiczMDeLongERPryorDBMuhlbaierLHMarkDB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med1993; 119(8): 844–850.
6.
CerattiARoger FranceFHBeguinC. Health data quality improvement by comparing administrative medical data and billing data. Int J Med Inform2008; 77(8): 527–533.
7.
Mark Weiner MD. Presentation at the Midwest Biostatistical Society Meeting, Muncie, Indiana, May 2009.
8.
Grannis SJ, Banger A and Harris D. ‘Perspectives on Patient Matching: Approaches, Findings, and Challenges [White paper]’, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=1240&mode=2 on (2009, accessed 4 May 2010).
9.
McGlynnEAAschSMAdamsJet al.The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med2003; 348(26): 2635–2645.
10.
HunterD. First, gather the data. N Engl J Med2006; 354: 329–331.
