This paper focuses on one of the most obvious points of difference in the use of time by men and women, namely, on the time spent by women in the context of procreation. From a legal perspective, the paper discusses the question of how the European Community's sex equality law - and, more specifically, selected case law by the Court of Justice of the European Communities - as well as the legal theories underlying that law, address the issues of pregnancy and confinement. One of the findings is that an accurate time perspective seems to be lacking both in law and in theory.
Bacchi, L. C.
(1990) Same Difference. Feminism and Sexual Difference. Sydney/Wellington/London/Boston: Allen & Unwin.
2.
Burrows, N.
(1991) `Maternity Rights in Europe - An Embryonic Legal Regime', Yearbook of European Law 1991: 275-292. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
Cavarero, A. (1990) `Die Perspektive der Geschlechterdifferenz', in U. Gerhard, M. Jansen, A. Maihofer, P. Schmid and I. Schulz (eds) Differenz und Gleichheit. Menschenrechte haben (k)ein Geschlecht, pp. 95-111. Frankfurt a.M.: Ulrike Helmer Verlag.
4.
Cornell, D.
(1991) Beyond Accommodation. New York/London: Routledge.
5.
Dahl, T. S.
(1988) Women's Law. An Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence, 2nd edn.Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
6.
Docksey, C.
(1991) `The Principle of Equality Between Women and Men as a Fundamental Right Under Community Law', Industrial Law Journal20: 258-280.
7.
Dowd, N. E.
(1989) `Work and Family: The Gender Paradox and the Limitations of Discrimination Analysis in Restructuring the Workplace', The Harvard Civil Rights - Civil Liberties Law Review24: 79-172.
8.
Ellis, E.
(1991) European Community Sex Equality LawOxford: Clarendon Press.
9.
Finley, L. M.
(1986) `Transcending Equality Theory: A Way out of the Maternity and the Workplace Debate', Columbia Law Review86: 1118-1182.
10.
Fraser, N.
(1994) `After the Family Wage. Gender Equity and the Welfare State', Political Theory22: 591-618.
11.
Fredman, S.
(1992) `European Community Discrimination Law: A Critique', Industrial Law Journal21(2): 119-134.
12.
Gerhard, U. (1990) `Bürgerliches Recht und Patriarchat', in U. Gerhard, M. Jansen, A. Maihofer, P. Schmid and I. Schulz (eds) Differenz und Gleichheit. Menschenrechte haben (k)ein Geschlecht, pp. 188-240. Frankfurt a.M.: Ulrike Helmer Verlag.
13.
Gilligan, C.
(1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
14.
Goldschmidt, J. E.
(1984/1985) `Pluralisme en gelijkheid', Nemesis1(4): 183-186.
15.
Goldschmidt, J. E. (1989) `Staats- en bestuursrechtelijke aspecten van positieve actie', Positieve Discriminatie, Preadviezen voor de NVJ. Zwolle: W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink.
16.
Goldschmidt, J. E.
(1993) We Need Different Stories. Zwolle: W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink.
17.
Goldschmidt, J. E. (1994) `Een autonome ontwikkeling', Nemesis 10: 167-76.
18.
Halimi, G. (ed.) (1994) Femmes, moitié de la terre, moitié du pouvoir. Plaidoyer pour une démocratie paritaire. Paris: Gallimard.
19.
Hassauer, F. (1990) `Weiblichkeit - der blinde Fleck der Menschenrechte?' in U. Gerhard, M. Jansen, A. Maihofer, P. Schmid and I. Schulz (eds) Differenz und Gleichheit. Menschenrechte haben (k)ein Geschlecht, pp. 320-37. Frankfurt a.M.: Ulrike Helmer Verlag.
20.
Holtmaat, R. (1988) `Naar een ander recht', Nemesis 4(1): 3-13 and 4(2): 60-6.
21.
Holtmaat, R.
(1989) `The Power of Legal Concepts: The Development of a Feminist Theory of Law', International Journal of the Sociology of Law17: 481-502.
22.
Irigaray, L. (1990) `Über die Notwendigkeit geschlechtsdifferenzierter Rechte', in U. Gerhard, M. Jansen, A. Maihofer, P. Schmid and I. Schulz (eds) Differenz und Gleichheit. Menschenrechte haben (k)ein Geschlecht, pp. 338-50. Frankfurt a.M.: Ulrike Helmer Verlag.
23.
Koopmans, Th.
(1975) Constitutional Protection of Equality. Leiden: Sijthoff.
24.
Kristeva, J.
(1981) `Women's Time', Signs7(1): 13-35.
25.
Lacey, N.
(1987) `Legislation Against Sex Discrimination: Questions from a Feminist Perspective', Journal of Law and Society14: 411-421.
26.
Loenen, T. (1992) Verschil in Gelijkheid. De conceptualisering van het gelijkheidsbeginsel met betrekking tot vrouwen en mannen in Nederland en de Verenigde Staten. Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.
27.
MacKinnon, C. A.
(1979) Sexual Harassment of Working Women. A Case of sex Discrimination. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.
28.
MacKinnon, C.A.
(1987) Feminism Unmodified. Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
29.
MacKinnon, C. A.
(1991) `Reflections on Sex Equality under Law', The Yale Law Journal100: 1281-1328.
30.
MacKinnon, C. A.
(1993) `Crimes of War, Crimes of Peace', in St. Shute and S. Hurley (eds) On Human Rights. The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, pp. 83-109. New York: HarperCollins.
31.
Maihofer, A. (1990) `Gleichheit nur für Gleiche?' in U. Gerhard, M. Jansen, A. Maihofer, P. Schmid and I. Schulz (eds) Differenz und Gleichheit. Menschenrechte haben (k)ein Geschlecht, pp. 351-67. Frankfurt a.M.: Ulrike Helmer Verlag.
32.
More, G. C.
(1992) `Reflections on Pregnancy Discrimination under European Community Law', Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law1992: 48-56.
33.
More, G. C.
(1993) ` “Equal Treatment” of the Sexes in European Community Law: what does “Equal” mean?', Feminist Legal Studies1: 45-74.
34.
Prechal, S.
(1993) `Combatting Indirect Discrimination in Community Law Context', Legal Issues of European Integration, pp. 81-97.
35.
Prechal, S.
and Burrows, N. (1990) Gender Discrimination Law of the European Community. Aldershot/Brookfield: Dartmouth.
36.
Scales, A.
(1986) `The Emergence of Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay', The Yale Law Journal95: 1373-1403.
37.
Smart, C.
(1991) `Feminist Jurisprudence', in P. Fitzpatrick (ed.), Dangerous Supplements. Resistance and Renewal in Jurisprudence, pp. 133-158. London: Pluto Press.
38.
Tobler, Ch. (1996) ` “Qui dit temps partiel, dit femmes”. Part-Time Work in the Context of Indirect Discrimination', Report on the European Forum 1994/1995 Conference on The Regulation of Working Time in the European Union - Gender Approach, Florence, 27 - 9 April 1995, forthcoming.
39.
Varikas, E. (1994) `Refonder ou raccommoder la démocratie: Réflexions critiques sur la demande de la parité des sexes', French Politics and Society 12: 1-34.
40.
Veldman, A. (1994) `Het gelijk in gelijkheid?', Nemesis 10: 119-25.
41.
Williams, W. W.
(1982) `The Equality Crisis: Some Reflections on Culture, Courts, and Feminism', Women's Rights Law Reporter7 (1982) 3: 175-200.
42.
Williams, W. W.
(1989) `Notes from a First Generation', University of Chicago Legal Forum: 99-113.
43.
Wolgast, E.
(1980) Equality and the Rights of Women. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
