Abstract
Rhythmanalysis and the way it is conducted is a theoretical concept and also a relatively novel framework using plural methodologies, often less grounded methods, on the border between various social sciences and philosophy. This paper elaborates on the rhythmanalytical approach developing a specific methodological framework that describes how to combine different, mostly empiric methods to achieve methodologically enriched results. The strength of such research is in the well thought-through combination and synergy of the methods used. It presents an empirical, methodological grasp on rhythmanalysis while it respects its phenomenological foundations and challenging character, as this field can always benefit from the updating of the methodological approaches.
The paper describes the application of such a framework in the context of the recent urban development of the Smíchov district in Prague. The focal point of the study, the Smíchov train terminal, was explored for rhythm-related phenomena at the very beginning of a significant transformation of the railway station. Documentary analysis was accompanied by semi-structured interviews, structured observation as well as time-lapse photography. This paper explains the specifics of each method, explores how they complement each other and evaluates it by presenting its advantages, disadvantages and recommendations for future use. Furthermore, it coins the concept of rhythmic anchors and renders outlooks and tenets applicable to future rhythmanalytical explorations including ethical considerations related to rhythmanalytical inquiries.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
