The present study investigated the interaction effect of time beliefs and interests in learning on the academic performance among Japanese junior high school students. We conducted a secondary analysis of a social science study whose data was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive. A total of 1672 junior high school students took an achievement test and responded to questionnaires that included items about time beliefs and interest in learning. The results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that hedonists’ academic performance was worse than ascetics’. However, the results also showed that interests in learning had a positive influence on academic performance, and this effect was stronger for hedonists than for ascetics. These results indicate additional positive aspects of concentrating on the present time in the field of learning, and these findings may be helpful for students who do not have a future perspective.
CarvalhoRGG (2015) Future time perspective as a predictor of adolescents’ adaptive behavior in school. School Psychology International36(5): 482–497.
2.
DeciEL (1992) The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In: RenningerKAHidiSKrappA (eds) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 43–70.
3.
De VolderMLLensW (1982) Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42(3): 566–571.
4.
FlowerdayTSchrawG (2003) Effect of choice on cognitive and affective engagement. Journal of Educational Research96(4): 207–215.
5.
FredricksonBL (1998) What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology2(3): 300–319.
6.
FredricksonBLBraniganC (2000) Positive emotions. In: MayneTJBonannoGA (eds) Emotions, New York: Guilford, pp. 123–151.
7.
Gutierrez-BraojosCSalmeron-PerezHMunoz-CanteroJM (2014) Moderator effect of time orientation patterns in achieving self-regulated learning. Journal of Psychodidactics19(2): 267–287.
8.
HidiS (1995) A reexamination of the role of attention in learning from text. Educational Psychology Review7(4): 323–350.
9.
HidiS (2001) Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review13(3): 191–209.
10.
HidiSRenningerKA (2006) The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist41(2): 111–127.
11.
IsaacJDSansoneCSmithJL (1999) Other people as a source of interest in an activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology35(3): 239–265.
12.
IzardCE (1977) Human Emotions, New York: Plenum Press.
13.
KrappASchiefeleUWintelerA (1992) Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In: RenningerKAHidiSKrappA (eds) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 183–196.
14.
LensWPaixãoMPHerreraDet al. (2012) Future time perspective as a motivational variable: Content and extension of future goals affect the quantity and quality of motivation. Japanese Psychological Research54(3): 321–333.
15.
LewinK (1951) Field Theory in Social Science, New York: Harper.
16.
MikkonenJRuohoniemiMLindblom-YlanneS (2013) The role of individual interest and future goals during the first years of university studies. Studies in Higher Education38(1): 71–86.
17.
PeetsmaTvan der VeenI (2011) Relations between the development of future time perspective in three life domains, investment in learning, and academic achievement. Learning and Instruction21(3): 481–494.
18.
PintrichPRZushoA (2002) The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In: WigfieldAEcclesJS (eds) Development of Achievement Motivation, New York: Academic Press, pp. 249–284.
19.
SchrawGFlowerdayTLehmanS (2001) Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review13(3): 211–224.
20.
ShiraiT (1991) Relationships between time perspective and time beliefs from adolescence to middle age. The Japanese Journal of Psychology62(4): 260–263.
21.
SimonsJDewitteSLensW (2000) Wanting to have versus wanting to be: The effect of perceived instrumentality on goal orientation. British Journal of Psychology91(3): 335–351.
22.
SimonsJVansteenkisteMLensWet al. (2004) Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review16(2): 121–139.
23.
TabachnickSEMillerRBRelyeaGE (2008) The relationships among students' future-oriented goals and subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and task-oriented self-regulation strategies in an academic environment. Journal of Educational Psychology100(3): 629–642.
24.
TeahanJE (1958) Future time perspective, optimism, and academic achievement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology57(3): 379–380.
25.
TsuzukiM (1993) Relation between ego identity and time perspective in adolescents. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology41(1): 40–48.
26.
Van CalsterKLensWNuttinJR (1987) Affective attitude towards the personal future: Impact on motivation in high school boys. The American Journal of Psychology100(1): 1–13.
27.
ZimmermanBJ (2002) Achieving self-regulation: The trial and triumph of adolescence. In: PajaresFUrbanT (eds) Academic Motivation of Adolescents, Greenwich, CT: Information Age, pp. 1–27.
28.
ZimmermanBJBanduraA (1994) Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal31(4): 845–862.
