Although detailed analyses are available, little is said about the consequences of time poverty. A possible new implication is analysed within this article: The author tests whether time poor individuals compare less between prices, therefore do not identify ‘bargains’ or ‘rip-offs’ and pay in average more for identical products and services. Using data drawn from the German Time Use Survey 2001/02 and the German Sample Survey of Income and Expenditure 2003, instrumental variables estimations are arranged to account for an expected bias in ordinary least squares estimations and to catch the causal effect of time poverty on the paid prices per good.
AguiarMHurstE (2005) Consumption versus expenditure. The Journal of Political Economy113: 919–948.
2.
AnttilaTOinasTNättiJ (2009) Predictors of time famine among Finnish employees. Work, family or leisure?Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research6: 73–91.
Bardasi E and Wodon Q (2006) Measuring time poverty and analyzing its determinants. Concepts and application to guinea. Gender, Time Use, and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa, World Bank Working Paper, No. 73, pp. 75–95.
5.
BayeMRMorganJ (2001) Information gatekeepers on the Internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. The American Economic Review91: 454–474.
6.
BayeMRMorganJScholtenP (2004) Price dispersion in the small and in the large. Evidence from an internet price comparison site. The Journal of Industrial Economics52: 463–496.
7.
Baye MR, Morgan J and Scholten P (2006): Persistent price dispersion in online markets. In: Jansen DW (ed.) The New Economy and Beyond: Past, Present and Future. New York: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 122–143.
8.
BayeMRMorganJScholtenP (2007) Information, search, and price dispersion. Economics and Information Systems1: 323–375.
9.
Bittman M and Wajcman J (2000) The rush hour. The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces 79: 165–189.
10.
BonkeJGerstoftF (2007) Stress, time use and gender. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research4: 47–68.
11.
Bundesregierung (2005) Lebenslagen in Deutschland - Zweiter Armuts- und Reichtumsbericht. Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung. 2. Ausg. Bonn: Bundesanzeiger Verl. (Drucksache/Deutscher Bundestag, 15, 5015).
Ehling M (2003) Erhebungen zur Zeitverwendung 1991/92 und 2001/02. Skizzierung des methodischen Vorgehens. In: Wirtschaft und Statistik – Sonderausgabe anlässlich des 54. Weltkongresses des Internationalen Statistischen Instituts vom 13. bis 20. August 2003 in Berlin, pp. 85–87.
14.
Ehling M, Holz E and Kahle I (2001) Erhebungsdesign der Zeitbudgeterhebung 2001/2002. Wirtschaft und Statistik 6: 427–436.
15.
GershunyJ (2000) Changing Times, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
GoodinRERiceJMBittmanM (2005) The time-pressure illusion. Discretionary time vs. free time. Social Indicators Research73: 43–77.
17.
GoodinRERiceJMParpoA (2008) Discretionary Time. A New Measure of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis. 5th ed., international ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
GronauR (1977) Leisure, home production, and work. The theory of the allocation of time revisited. The Journal of Political Economy85: 1099–1123.
20.
Haller P (2004) Keine Zeit für Werbung? In: Jahrestagung 2004 des GfK-Nürnberg e.V. ‘Der Verbraucher im Zeitstress: Bremse oder Motor des Konsums?’, pp.28–38.
21.
HarveyASMukhopadhyayAK (2007) When twenty-four hours is not enough. Time poverty of working parents. Social Indicators Research82: 57–77.
22.
HaughtonJKhandkerSR (2009) Handbook on Poverty and Inequality, Washington, DC: World Bank.
23.
LinderSB (1970) The Harried Leisure Class, New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
McDonald S and Wren C (2012) Informative brand advertising and pricing strategies in internet markets with heterogeneous consumer search. International Journal of the Economics of Business 19: 103–117.
25.
Maddala GS (2006) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. 17 print. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (Econometric Society monographs, 3).
26.
MattinglyMJBlanchiSM (2003) Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time. The U.S. experience. Social Forces81: 999–1030.
27.
MerzJHanglbergerDRuchaR (2010) The timing of daily demand for goods and services. Microsimulation policy results of an aging society, increasing labour market flexibility, and extended public childcare in Germany. Journal of Consumer Policy33: 119–141.
28.
MerzJRathjenT (2009) Time and Income Poverty. An Interdependent Multidimensional Poverty Approach with German Time Use Diary Data, Lüneburg: FFB (FFB-Discussion Paper, 79).
29.
MerzJRathjenT (2011a) Sind Selbständige zeit- und einkommensarm? Zur Dynamik interdependenter multidimensionaler Armut mit den deutschen Zeitbudgeterhebungen. In: Bekmeier-FeuerhahnSMartinAMerzJ (eds) Die Dynamik tiefgreifenden Wandels in Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft und Unternehmen, No. 5, Münster: LIT, pp. 219–244.
30.
MerzJRathjenT (2011b) Intensity of Time and Income Interdependent Multidimensional Poverty: Well-Being and Minimum 2DGAP. German Evidence, Lüneburg: FFB (FFB-Discussion Paper, 92).
31.
MerzJRathjenT (2012) Zeit- und Einkommensarmut von Selbständigen als Freiberufler und Unternehmer. Ein Beitrag zu interdependenter multidimensionaler Armut und zu den ‘woorking poor’. In: JoachimRFGoebelJGrabkaMM (eds) Ungleichheitsentwicklungen und Verteilungsspielräume. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 80. Jahrgang. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 51–76.
32.
Pollak RA (2012) Allocating time. Individuals' technologies, household technology, perfect substitutes, and specialization. Annales of Economics and Statistics 105/106: 75–98.
33.
PrattJWWiseDAZackhauserR (1979) Price differences in almost competitive markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics93: 189–211.
34.
Precht RD (2007) Wer bin ich - und wenn ja, wie viele? Eine philosophische Reise. 28th ed. l. München: Goldmann.
35.
Robinson JP and Godbey G (1999) Time for life. The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. 2nd ed. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
36.
SalopSStiglitzJ (1977) Bargains and ripoffs. A model of monopolistically competitive price dispersion. The Review of Economic Studies44: 493–510.
37.
SevillaAGimenez-NadalJIGershunyJ (2012) Leisure inequality in the United States. 1965–2003. Demography49: 939–964.
38.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) Alltag in Deutschland. Analysen zur Zeitverwendung; Beiträge zur Ergebniskonferenz der Zeitbudgeterhebung 2001/02 am 16/17. Februar 2004 in Wiesbaden, Stuttgart: Metzler-Poeschel (Schriftenreihe Forum der Bundesstatistik, 43).
Statistisches Bundesamt (2005b) Qualitätsbericht. Einkommens- und Verbrauchsstichprobe 2003. Wiesbaden.
41.
StiglerGJ (1961) The economics of information. The Journal of Political Economy69: 213–225.
42.
SullivanO (2004) Changing gender practices within the household. A theoretical perspective. Gender and Society18: 207–222.
43.
VickeryC (1977) The time-poor. A new look at poverty. Journal of Human Resources12: 27–48.
44.
Wehner C (2004) Die Zeitsparer: Eine Zielgruppe wird besichtigt. In: Jahrestagung 2004 des GfK-Nürnberg e.V. ‘Der Verbraucher im Zeitstress: Bremse oder Motor des Konsums?’, pp.7–19.
45.
Wooldridge JM (2009) Introductory Econometrics. A Modern Approach. 4th ed., international student ed. Mason, OH: South-Western.
46.
Zeng H (2007) Three Essays on Consumer Choice Behavior in the Health Insurance Market. Indiana University, Ann Arbor: ProQuest.
