Fortin PR, Stucki G., Katz JNMeasuring relevant change: an emerging challenge in rheumatologic clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum1995: 1027-1030.
2.
Liang MHTowards more informative pilot studies with new anti-rheumatic drugs . Agents and Actions44 (suppl. 119), 77-81.
3.
Redelmeier DA , Lorig K.Assessing the clinical importance of symptomatic improvements. An illustration in rheumatology. Arch Int Med1993; 153: 1337-1342.
4.
Kopec JA et al. The Quebec back pain disability scale: measurement properties . Spine1995 (in press).
5.
Liang MH et al. Reliability and validity of six systems for the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum1989; 32: 1107-1118.
6.
Bombardier C. et al. Derivation of the SLEDAI: a disease activity index for lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum1992; 35: 630-640.
7.
Hay EM et al. TheBILAG index: a reliable and valid instrument for measuring clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Q J Med1993 ; 86: 447-458.
8.
Petri M., Hellmann D., Hochberg M.Validity and reliability of lupus activity measures in the routine clinic setting. J Rheumatol1992; 9: 53-59.
9.
Vitali C. et al. Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: report of the Consensus Study Group of The European Workshop for Rheumatology Research. II. Identification of the variables indicative of disease activity and their use in the development of an activity score. Clin Exp Rheumatol1992; 10: 541-547.