Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

LupusPRO is a disease-targeted, patient-reported outcome measure developed for assessing the quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Initially, the questionnaire was validated among U.S. patients of varied ethnic backgrounds and genders. This study aims to carry out a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish-translated version of LupusPRO.

Method

We administered the Polish version of LupusPRO along with the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, and the Polish modification of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-M). At the same time, we collected demographics and clinical characteristics. Disease activity, damage, and exacerbation were assessed using SELENA-SLEDAI, SLICC/ACR DI and LFA. Furthermore, we tested internal consistency reliability (measured with Cronbach’s alpha), test-retest reliability (using r-Pearson correlation coefficient), convergent validity (against corresponding domains of SF-36) and criterion validity (against disease activity, damage and EQ-VAS), and known group validity.

Results

A total of 199 (91% females) patients with SLE with a mean age of 42.6 ± 12.62 years participated in the study. We observed that the mean SELENA-SLEDAI reached 5.3 (±5.9) points, while SLICC/ACR DI was at 1.3 (±2.0) points. The internal consistency reliability of LupusPRO domains ranged between 0.737 and 0.925 (except for Lupus Symptoms, Social Support, Coping, and Satisfaction with care). For all domains except Social Support, test-retest reliability exceeded 0.7. Convergent validity with corresponding domains of the SF-36 was good (r > 0.5). All health-related quality of life domains performed well against disease activity and damage measures, establishing its criterion validity. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a satisfactory fit. (± expression of range).

Conclusion

The Polish version of LupusPRO has proved to have fair psychometric properties among Polish patients with SLE.

Keywords

Systemic lupus erythematosus quality of life lupusPRO

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cheng

Wang

, et al. The impact of SLE on health-related quality of life assessed with SF-36: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Lupus 2019; 28(3): 371–382.

Thumboo

Strand

. Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an update. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007; 36(2): 115–122.

Doria

Rinaldi

Ermani

, et al. Health-related quality of life in Italian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. II. Role of clinical, immunological and psychological determinants. Rheumatology 2004; 43(12): 1580–1586.

Ware

Sherbourne

. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.

The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL) . Position paper from the world health organization. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41(10): 1403–1409.

EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199-208.

Kuriya

Gladman

Ibañez

, et al. Quality of life over time in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59(2): 181–185.

Aggarwal

Wilke

Pickard

, et al. Psychometric properties of the EuroQol-5D and short Form-6D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2009; 36(6): 1209–1216.

Grootscholten

Ligtenberg

Derksen

RHWM

, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: development and validation of a lupus specific symptom checklist. Qual Life Res 2003; 12(6): 635–644.

10.

Leong

Kong

Thong

BYH

, et al. Development and preliminary validation of a systemic lupus erythematosus-specific quality-of-life instrument (SLEQOL). Rheumatology 2005; 44(10): 1267–1276.

11.

Doward

McKenna

Whalley

, et al. The development of the L-QoL: a qualityof-life instrument specific to systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 196–200.

12.

McElhone

Castelino

Abbott

, et al. The LupusQoL and associations with demographics and clinical measurements in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2010; 37(11): 2273–2279.

13.

Jolly

Pickard

Block

, et al. Disease-specific patient reported outcome tools for systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2012; 42(1): 56–65.

14.

Bourré-Tessier

Clarke

Mikolaitis-Preuss

, et al. Cross-cultural validation of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for systemic lupus erythematosus in Canada. J Rheumatol 2013; 40(8): 1327–1333.

15.

Navarra

Tanangunan

Mikolaitis-Preuss

, et al. Cross-cultural validation of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for lupus in Philippines. Lupus 2013; 22(3): 262–267.

16.

Inoue

Shiozawa

Yoshihara

, et al. The Japanese LupusPRO: a cross-cultural validation of an outcome measure for lupus. Lupus 2017; 26(8): 849–856.

17.

Pinto

Jolly

Dhooria

, et al. Hindi LupusPRO: cross cultural validation of disease specific patient reported outcome measure of lupus. Lupus 2019; 28(13): 1534–1540.

18.

Jolly

Toloza

Block

, et al. Spanish LupusPRO: cross-cultural validation study for lupus. Lupus 2013; 22(5): 431–436.

19.

Mok

Kosinski

, et al. Validation of the LupusPRO in Chinese patients from Hong Kong with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res 2015; 67(2): 297–304.

20.

Kaya

Goker

Cura

, et al. Turkish lupusPRO: cross-cultural validation study for lupus. Clin Rheumatol 2014; 33(8): 1079–1084.

21.

Devilliers

Jolly

Samson

, et al. Validation of the French version of lupus patient reported outcome (LupusPRO), a disease-specific patient reported outcome for lupus patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016; 68(10): 1776–1778.

22.

Jolly

Mazzoni

Cicognani

. Measurement properties of web based lupuspro, a disease targeted otcome tool, among Italian patients with lupus. Value Health 2015; 18(3): A302.

23.

Elkaraly

Nasef

Omar

, et al. The Arabic LupusPRO: a cross-cultural validation of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool for quality of life in lupus patients. Lupus 2020; 29(13): 1727–1735.

24.

Han

Cho

Nam

, et al. Korean LupusPRO: cross-Cultural validation study for systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2022; 31(12): 1498–1507.

25.

Wild

Grove

Martin

, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 2005; 8(2): 94–104.

26.

Beaton

Bombardier

Guillemin

, et al. Guidelines for the process of crosscultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3186–3191.

27.

Petri

Orbai

Alarcõn

, et al. Derivation and validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(8): 2677–2686.

28.

Petri

Kim

Kalunian

, et al. Combined oral contraceptives in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2005; 353(24): 2550–2558.

29.

Gladman

Ginzler

Goldsmith

, et al. The development and initial validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics/American college of rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39(3): 363–369.

30.

Walden-Głuszko

Majkowicz

. Praktyczna ocena efektywności opieki paliatywnej - wybrane techniki badawcze. Ocena Jakości Opieki Paliatywnej w Teorii i Praktyce. Gdańsk: Wyd: Akademia Medyczna w Gdańsku, 2000, pp. 21–39.

31.

Hays

Anderson

Revicki

. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Qual Life Res 1993; 2(6): 441–449.

32.

Bentler

. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 1999; 6(1): 1–55.

33.

Carle

Riley

Hays

, et al. Confirmatory factor analysis of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) adult domain framework using item response theory scores. Med Care 2015; 53(10): 894–900.

34.

Jolly

Sequeira

Block

, et al. Sex differences in quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res 2019; 71(12): 1647–1652.

35.

Ainiala

Loukkola

Peltola

, et al. The prevalence of neuropsychiatric syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 496–500.

36.

Fonseca

Bernardes

Terroso

, et al. Silent burdens in disease: fatigue and depression in SLE. Autoimmune Dis 2014; 2014: 790724.

37.

Beckerman

Auerbach

Blanco

. Psychosocial dimensions of SLE: implications for the health care team. J Multidiscip Healthc 2011; 4: 63–72.

38.

McDowell

. The theoretical and technical foundations of health measurement. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Oxford Scholarschip: Oxford Univercity Press, 2009, pp. 30–53.

39.

Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej . Komunikat z badań: Nie Ma jak rodzina. (2019). https://cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2019/K_022_19.PDF

40.

Jankowski

Zajenkowski

. Metody szacowania rzetelności pomiaru testem. Psychometria. Podstawowe zagadnienia. Fronczyk K. Wyd: Wyższa Szkoła Finansów i Zarządzania w Warszawie. Warszawa: Vizja Press & IT, 2009, pp. 84–110.

41.

Streiner

Norman

Cairney

. Reliability. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Wyd: Oxford University Press, 2008.

42.

Aday

Cornelius

. Designing and conducting health surveys: a comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Wyd: Jossey-Bass, 2006, pp. 48–80.

43.

Burns

Grove

. The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique, and utilization. Philadelphia: Wyd: W. B. Saunders, 2001.

44.

Etchegaray-Morales

Méndez-Martínez

Jiménez-Hernández

, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in Mexican lupus patients using the LupusQol. PLoS One 2017; 12(1): e0170209.

The polish validation of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure of systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References