Abstract
Background/Purpose
Sarcopenia, i.e., loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, is associated with poorer health. Although limited data suggest that sarcopenia is more prevalent among adults with (vs without) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), current methods for assessing sarcopenia are cumbersome and not widely available. We assessed associations of a self-report screening tool for sarcopenia (SARC-F) with functional outcomes in adults with SLE.
Methods
We obtained self-report functional measures and performance-based measures of physical function from women ≥18 years of age with SLE. Participants completed the SARC-F, covering strength, assistance walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls. We compared self-report functional measures and performance-based measures of physical function between dichotomized SARC-F scores (≥4 vs <4). We used Pearson correlations and linear and logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between the SARC-F as a continuous and dichotomous score with self-report functional measures and performance-based measures of physical function.
Results
Of 47 participants, 16 (34%) had worse SARC-F scores (i.e., ≥4). Participants with SARC-F ≥4 had worse organ damage and functional measures than those with SARC-F <4 (all p < 0.01). SARC-F continuous scores were correlated with hand grip strength, 4-m walk test, and self-report disability (all p < 0.01) and associated with functional status measures, including after adjustment (p < 0.01 to p = 0.046). Dichotomous SARC-F was associated with 4-m walk test (p < 0.01), including in adjusted models.
Conclusion
Among women with SLE, SARC-F was significantly associated with multiple functional status measures, suggesting that SARC-F is a promising screening tool for detection of sarcopenia among women with SLE.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
