Abstract
Purpose
To perform a quantitative multimodal evaluation in 25 patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) without ocular complaints and to compare them with 25 healthy individuals.
Methods
A structural and functional ophthalmological evaluation using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and microperimetry (MP) exam in 25 patients with PAPS, followed at a tertiary rheumatology outpatient clinic, was performed. All ophthalmologic manifestations were documented and subsequent statistical analysis was performed for comparative purposes, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
We included 100 eyes of 50 subjects (25 patients with PAPS without ocular complaints and 25 healthy individuals). Quantitative OCTA assessment revealed significant differences between PAPS patients and controls in both the superficial vascular complex (SVC) and deep vascular complex (DVC) using high-speed protocol, as well as in the SVC in the high-resolution protocol. Analysis of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters showed a larger area of FAZ in the DVC in PAPS patients using the high-speed method compared to the control group (p = 0.047). In MP quantitative analysis, the PAPS group exhibited lower central (p = 0.041) and global (p < 0.001) retinal sensitivity compared to the control group, along with sectoral differences, except in the inferior sector.
Conclusions
PAPS patients present lower vascular density and retinal sensitivity compared to the control group, even in patients without paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM). Our findings underscore the significance of ocular evaluation beyond symptomatic assessment in these patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
