Abstract
Objectives
Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is associated with adverse outcomes; however, imaging abnormalities are only detectable by conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in up to 50% of patients. This study investigated the variability in cortical thickness and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters among patients with NPSLE whose brain morphology appeared normal on conventional MRI.
Methods
This retrospective study enrolled 27 female patients with NPSLE (median age: 41.0 years, range: 22–63 years) and 34 female healthy controls (median age: 37.0 years, range: 24–55 years). None exhibited evident abnormalities on conventional MRI. Regional volumes, cortical thickness, and DTI parameters, including fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), were compared. Age-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to detect significant NPSLE-associated differences.
Results
No significant differences in grey or white matter volume fractions were observed between the groups. However, the NPSLE group demonstrated significant cortical thinning in the right pars opercularis (2.45 vs 2.52 mm, p = 0.007), reduced FA values in the fornix (0.35 vs 0.40, p = 0.001) and left anterior limb of internal capsule (0.50 vs 0.52, p = 0.012), and increased MD in the fornix (1.71 vs 1.48, p = 0.009) and left posterior corona radiata (0.80 vs 0.76, p = 0.005) compared with those of healthy controls.
Conclusions
Cortical thickness measurements and DTI analyses can be used to detect differential variations in patients with NPSLE who exhibit an otherwise normal brain structure on conventional MRI, indicating the existence of subtle changes despite the absence of obvious macrostructural central nervous system involvement of lupus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
