Corrigendum to “A North American perspective of content and quality of websites in the English language on childhood-onset lupus erythematosus”

Abstract

Corrigendum to A North American perspective of content and quality of websites in the English language on childhood-onset lupus erythematosus by C Cutler et al. Published in Lupus (2018) 27, 762–770. DOI: 10.1177/0961203317746246.

The authors wish to highlight the following correction. The subheading in Table 5 should read Content criteria and not DISCERN criteria. As well, the numbering of the table should read 1–15. Table 5

Mean (SD) Website content ratings by type of site

Content criteria	All sites (n = 9)	For-Profit (n = 2)	Not-for-profit (n = 6)	Academic (n = 1)
1. What is SLE	3.8 (0.6)	3.5 (0.7)	4.0 (0.6)	3.0
2. What causes SLE	3.9 (0.6)	3.5 (0.7)	4.0 (0.6)	4.0
3. How is it diagnosed	3.7 (0.8)	4.0 (0.0)	3.8 (0.5)	2.0
4. Having SLE: impact on child and family	1.7 (1.3)	1.3 (0.4)	2.1 (1.2)	0.0
5. Monitoring SLE (tests and medical followup)	1.7 (1.0)	2.0 (0.0)	1.9 (1.0)	0.0
6. Treatments – medications (what they are, how they work, and side effects)	3.1 (0.7)	3.3 (1.1)	3.3 (0.4)	2.0
7. Treatment – other therapies (PT, OT, CAM, nutrition)	1.2 (1.0)	1.5 (1.4)	1.0 (1.0)	2.0
8. Treatment – psychological therapies (relaxation, CBT)	1.1 (1.1)	1.5 (1.4)	1.2 (1.2)	0.0
9. How to recognize symptoms	3.3 (0.4)	3.0 (0.0)	3.4 (0.5)	3.0
10. Managing emotions (stress, anxiety, depression)	2.0 (1.2)	2.0 (2.2)	2.0 (1.2)	2.0
11. Supports (community, school, work settings)	1.8 (1.2)	1.3 (1.1)	2.0 (1.4)	2.0
12. Lifestyle (fitness, nutrition, sexuality, body image, recreational drugs, smoking, alcohol, tattooing/piercing)	1.3 (0.9)	0.8 (0.4)	1.4 (1.0)	2.0
13. Transitioning to adult health care	0.4 (0.8)	0.0 (0.0)	0.7 (0.9)	0.0
14. Transitioning to adulthood	0.4 (0.8)	0.0 (0.0)	0.7 (0.9)	0.0
15. Total score (out of 14)	29.5 (7.8)	27.5 (4.2)	31.4 (8.6)	22.0

a

The 9 websites with a mean DISCERN score of 50 or greater were further evaluated by 2 pediatric rheumatologists for quality of content. Websites were evaluated as a whole and within their author affiliation groups for each of the 14 criteria.