Adherence to online monitoring of patient-reported outcomes by patients with chronic inflammatory diseases: a feasibility study

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this report is to investigate the feasibility of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) via e-questionnaires delivered to patients with chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs).

Methods

Consecutive outpatients with a confirmed diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren’s syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease were followed at two medical departments. Patients received monthly e-mails containing the SF36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and an analogue symptom scale over a six-month period. Participation rate, socio-demographic characteristics and patients’ satisfaction were analysed.

Results

A total of 128 patients were included (79% female; mean age: 42 ± 12 years). Eighty-two per cent of questionnaires were returned. The monthly participation rate ranged from 89% to 77%, with a six-month attrition rate of 13%. The mean completion rate of questionnaires was 98%. Factors significantly associated with increased answer rate were: married/couple status, greater number of children at home and previous participation in online surveys. The main reasons for non-response were: ‘too busy to participate’ (35%) and ‘away from home Internet access’ (31%). Overall, 68% of the participants found the study convenient and 96% agreed to continue at a monthly or bimonthly frequency.

Conclusion

Online home self-assessment of PROs was feasible in the setting of CIDs. Patients were satisfied and willing to continue the survey. The Internet allows immediate and sophisticated presentation of PROs to clinicians. Future studies are warranted to determine how PRO monitoring may contribute to routine care in CIDs and other diseases.

Keywords

Patient-reported outcomes chronic inflammatory diseases quality of life feasibility study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Thumboo

Strand

. Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: An update. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007; 36: 115–122.

Barnado

Wheless

Meyer

Gilkeson

Kamen

. Quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with related controls within a unique African American population. Lupus 2012; 21: 563–569.

Segal

Bowman

Fox

. Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome: Health experiences and predictors of health quality among patients in the United States. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7: 46–46.

Meijer

Meiners

Huddleston Slater

. Health-related quality of life, employment and disability in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48: 1077–1082.

Maunder

. Evidence that stress contributes to inflammatory bowel disease: Evaluation, synthesis, and future directions. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005; 11: 600–608.

Lönnfors

Vermeire

Greco

Hommes

Bell

Avedano

. IBD and health-related quality of life –discovering the true impact. J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8: 1281–1286.

Greenhalgh

. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 115–123.

Snyder

Aaronson

. Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Lancet 2009; 374: 369–370.

Fayers

. Evaluating the effectiveness of using PROs in clinical practice: A role for cluster-randomised trials. Qual Life Res 2008; 17: 1315–1321.

10.

Lohr

Zebrack

. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 99–107.

11.

Fung

Hays

. Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 2008; 17: 1297–1302.

12.

Bennett

Jensen

Basch

. Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 336–347.

13.

Haywood

Marshall

Fitzpatrick

. Patient participation in the consultation process: A structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 63: 12–23.

14.

Snyder

. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A promising approach? J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 1099–1100.

15.

Detmar

Muller

Schornagel

Wever

Aaronson

. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 3027–3034.

16.

Taenzer

Bultz

Carlson

. Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology 2000; 9: 203–213.

17.

Takeuchi

Keding

Awad

. Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2910–2917.

18.

Velikova

Booth

Smith

. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 714–724.

19.

Feldman-Stewart

Brundage

. A conceptual framework for patient-provider communication: A tool in the PRO research tool box. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 109–114.

20.

Engelen

Haverman

Koopman

. Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 81: 235–244.

21.

Haverman

van Rossum

MAJ

van Veenendaal

. Effectiveness of a web-based application to monitor health-related quality of life. Pediatrics 2013; 131: e533–e543.

22.

Bush

Donaldson

Moinpour

. Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 77–93.

23.

Gwaltney

Shields

Shiffman

. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. Value Health J 2008; 11: 322–333.

24.

Petri

Orbai

Alarcón

. Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 2677–2686.

25.

Vitali

Bombardieri

Jonsson

. Classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: A revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 554–558.

26.

Dignass

Lindsay

Sturm

. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 2: Current management. J Crohns Colitis 2012; 6: 991–1030.

27.

Richter

Becker

Koch

. Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: Comparison with standardised paper questionnaires. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 1739–1741.

28.

Berthelot

Le Goff

Maugars

. The Hawthorne effect: Stronger than the placebo effect? Joint Bone Spine 2011; 78: 335–336.

29.

Berthelot

Batard

le Goff

Maugars

. Online home self-assessment: A tool for improving future treatment trials? Joint Bone Spine 2013; 80: 5–7.

30.

Jamilloux

Sarabi

. Online home self-assessment: A tool for improving future treatment trials… and daily practice: Comments on the editorial by Berthelot JM, et al. “Online home self-assessment: A tool for improving future treatment trials?”. Joint Bone Spine 2013; 80: 5–7, 441–442.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.25 MB