AbmaTANierseCJWiddershovenGA. Patients as partners in responsive research: Methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qual Health Res2009; 19: 401–415.
2.
De WitMPBerloSEAanerudGJ. European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis2011; 70: 722–726.
3.
SchipperKAbmaTvan ZadelhoffE. What does it mean to be a patient research partner? An ethnodrama. Qual Inq2010; 16: 501–510.
4.
EULAR. Patient involvement in research – A way to success. www.eular.org (accessed October 2014).
5.
De WitMPAbmaTAKoelewijn-van LoonMSCollinsSKirwanJ. What has been the effect on trial outcome assessments of a decade of patient participation in OMERACT?J Rheumatol2014; 41: 177–184.
6.
NierseCJSchipperKvan ZadelhoffEvan de GriendtJAbmaTA. Collaboration and co-ownership in research: Dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expect2012; 15: 242–254.
7.
GordonCIsenbergDLerstromK. The substantial burden of systemic lupus erythematosus on the productivity and careers of patients: A European patient-driven online survey. Rheumatology2013; 52: 2292–2301.
8.
Van VollenhovenRFMoscaMBertsiasG. Treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus: Recommendations from an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis2014; 73: 958–967.
9.
HaleEDTreharneGJLyonsAC. ‘Joining the dots’ for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Personal perspectives of health care from a qualitative study. Ann Rheum Dis2006; 65: 585–589.
10.
AbmaTABroerseJE. Patient participation as dialogue: Setting research agendas. Health Expect2010; 13: 160–173.
