Abstract
One of the greatest enigmas in thrombosis research is the observation that one can diagnose a person with a thrombotic risk with a prolongation of the clotting time. Our textbooks have taught us that prolongation of clotting correlates with a tendency to bleed. To confuse our textbook knowledge further, the same patients often have a prolonged bleeding time, a diagnostic test to detect a dysfunction in primary haemostasis. In this paper we critically review the literature that tries to explain the contradiction that exists between in-vitro diagnostic tests and the observed clinical manifestations and discuss our current opinion on how antiphospholipid antibodies can disturb the haemostatic balance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
