Reports results of a survey of UK university libraries to study the nature and degree of subject specialization practised there, as a follow up to a similar study conducted 15 years earlier (Journtal of Librarianship, 14, (2), April 1982, 93-108, (LISA ref. 834342)). For the purposes of comparison the present sur vey, which was sent to chief librarians, covers those same institutions stud ied in 1981 and, consequently, does not include the new universities that were formerly polytechnics. Libraries are classified into the same five categories of specializations as in the previous study: functional; dual; hybrid; 3 tier; and subject divisional. The expectation from the earlier study - that subject spe cialization would become less feasible in the future - has not been realized. Whereas the question had appeared to be one of whether university libraries could afford the services of subject librarians, 15 years later the challenge to their existence appears more profound.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, Richard (Chairman) (1976) (University Grants Committee) Capital provision for university libraries: report of a working party. London: HMSO
2.
Avafia, K.E. (1983) Subject specialization in African university libraries . Journal of Librarianship, 15, (3),183-205
3.
Baker, David (1994) On being a subject specialist. In: Studies for Elizabeth Fudakowska, edited by David Baker and Christopher Smith.Norwich: Solen Press, pp 35-42
4.
Bandara, S.B. (1986) Subject specialists in university libraries in developing countries: the need. Libri, 36, (3), 202-210
5.
Biskup, P. (1977) Subject specialists in German learned libraries . Libri, 27, (2), 136-153
6.
Burrows, T. (1989) British university libraries. New York; London: Haworth Press , pp 58-62
7.
Corrall, Sheila (1995) An evolving service: managing change. In: Networking and the future of libraries 2: managing the intellectual record. An international conference held at the University of Bath, 19-21 April 1995 , edited by Lorcan Dempsey, Derek Law and Ian Mowat.London: Library Association Publishing, in association with the UK Office for Library and Information Networking, University of Bath, pp 45-61.
8.
Duckett, R.J. (1985) Subject departments: their rise and fall at Bradford Metropolitan Libraries. Art Libraries Journal, 10, (2), 5-11
9.
East, H. and Tilson, Y. (1993) The liberated end user: developments in practice and policy for database provision to the academic community. London: British Library Board. (British Library Research and Development Report 6100/Centre for Communication and Information Studies Policy Paper no. 4)
10.
East, H., Sheppard, E. and Jeal, Y. (1995) A huge leap forward: a quantitative and qualitative examination of the development of access to database services by British universities, 1988-1994. London: British Library Board. (British Library Research and Development Report 6202/Centre for Communication and Information Studies Policy Paper no. 5)
11.
(John) Fielden Consultancy (1993) Supporting expansion: a report on human resources management in academic libraries, for the Joint Funding Councils' Libraries Review Group. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. (Supplement to the Follett report)
12.
Follett, Sir Brian (Chairman) (1993) Joint Funding Councils' Libraries Review Group: report. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England
13.
Hay, F.J. (1990) The subject specialist in the academic library: a review article. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16, (1), 11-17
14.
Heseltine, Richard (1994) A critical appraisal of the role of global networks in the transformation of higher education. Alexandria, 6, (3), 159-171
15.
Heseltine, Richard (1995) The challenge of learning in cyberspace. Library Association Record, 97, (8), 432-433
16.
Holbrook, A. (1984) The subject librarian and social scientists: liaison in a university setting. Aslib Proceedings, 36, (6), 269-275
17.
Holbrook, A. (1984) Subject specialists in university libraries: fossils or forerunners. U, C & R Newsletter (Library Association), (12), 7-9
18.
Johnson, E.R. (1977) Subject-divisional organization in American university libraries, 1939-1974. Library Quarterly, 47, (1), 23-42
19.
Law, D. ( 1991) The organization of collection management in academic libraries. In: Collection management in academic libraries , edited by Clare Jenkins and Mary Morley.Aldershot: Gower, 1-20
20.
MacKenna, R.O. (1977) Subject-divisional organization in a major Scottish research library. In: Of one accord: essays in honour of W. B. Paton, edited by F. McAdams.Glasgow: Scottish Library Association, 99-109
21.
Royan, B. (1990) Staff structures for today's information services . British Journal of Academic Librarianship, 5, (3), 165-169
22.
Scrivener, J.E. (1974) Subject specialization in academic libraries: some British practices. Australian Academic and Research Libraries , 5, (3), 113-122
23.
Walker, M. (1975) Introduction and survey. In: Libraries in higher education: the user approach to service, edited by John Cowley.London: Bingley, 105-111
24.
Wilkinson, J.P. (1983) Subject divisionalism: a diagnostic analysis. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 2, 21-38
25.
Woodhead, P.A. and Martin, J.V. (1982) Subject specialization in British university libraries: a survey. Journal of Librarianship, 14, (2), 93-108.
