A critical assessment is made of psychological investigations into the personality of the librarian conducted over the last 30 years. The influence of societal stereotypes upon psychological research is examined. Problematic methodologies and conflicting results preclude the emergence of any distinct personality profile common to librarians. The studies fail to demonstrate links between the individual and the organization. The efficacy of the whole psychological enterprise is brought into question
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bryan, A.I.The public librarian: a report of the public library inquiry. Columbia University Press, 1952.
2.
Twain, M.Pudd'nhead Wilson. Bantam Books, 1981 .
3.
Cowell, P.Not all in the mind: the virile profession . Library Review, 1980, 29, 167-75.
Polytechnic of North London.School of Lzbrarranshrp and Information Studies prospectus. PNL, 1985.
6.
Lodge, D.The British Museum is falling down. Penguin Books , 1983.
7.
Rettig, J.The reference librarian as 'the most unpoetical of all God's creatures '. Reference Services Review, 1984, 12 (2), 9.
8.
Gahagan, J.Interpersonal and group behaviour. Methuen, 1975.
9.
Black, S.M.Personality—librarians as communicators. Canadian Library Journal, April 1981, 65-71.
10.
Agada, J.Studies of the personality of librarians. Drexel Library Quarterly , 1984, 20 (2), 24-45.
11.
Douglass, R.R.The personality of the librarian. University of Chicago, 1957.
12.
Morrison, P.D.The career of the academic librarian: a study of the social origins, educational attainments, vocational experience, and personality characteristics of a group of American academic librarians. American Library Association, 1969.
13.
McDermoth, M.Authoritarian potential in the personality of the librarian. Argus, January-February 1979 , 22-7.
14.
McMahon, A.The personality of the librarian. Libraries Board of South Australia, 1967.
15.
Baillie, G.S.An investigation of objective admission variables as they relate to academic and job success in one graduate library education program. Washington University, 1961 .
16.
Baillie, G.S.Library school and job success. University of Denver, 1964.
17.
Clayton, H.An investigation of personality characteristics among library students in one midwestern university. State University of NewYork, 1970.
18.
Clayton, H.Femininity and job satisfaction among male library students at one midwestern university. College and Research Libraries, 1970, 31, 338-98.
19.
Turner, R.L.Femininity and the librarian—another testCollege and Research Libraries, May 1980, 235-41.
20.
Sharpe, S.Just like a girl: how girls learn to be women. Penguin Books, 1976.
21.
Busha, C.H.Student attitudes toward censorship and authoritananism . Journal of Education for Librarianship, 1970, 11, 118—36.
22.
Fine, S.Resistance to technological innovation in libraries, final report . Office of Education, 1979.
23.
Presthus, R.Technological change and occupational responses: a study of librarians. Office of Education, 1970.
24.
Hamilton, S.S.Work motivation of Alabama librarians: a challenge for change. Alabama Librarian, 1975 , 27, 4-7.
25.
Sladen, D.The personality of the librarian: an investigation . Library Association Record, 1972, 74 (7), 118—19.
26.
Lee, D.C. , and Hall, J.E.Female library science students and the occupational stereotype: fact or fiction?College and Research Libraries, 1973, 34 (5), 265—7.
27.
Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J., and Hinings, C.R.Writers on organizations, 3rd edn. Penguin Books, 1983.
28.
Neill, S.D.The reference process and certain types of memory: semantic, episodic, and schematic. RQ, 1984 , 23 (4), 417-25.
29.
Johnson, K.A., and White, D.M.The cognitive style of reference librarians . RQ, 1982, 21 (3), 239-46.
30.
Cooke, D.The language of music. Oxford University Press , 1959.
31.
Merleau-Ponty, M.Sense and non-sense. Northwestern University Press, 1964.
32.
Skevington, P.W.Letters. Library Association Record, 1972, 74 (9), 171.
