Abstract
A survey of subject specialization in UK university libraries was made in April 1981. Replies were received in the form of letters, from which quotations are made liberally. The evolution of subject specialization is traced and views on the term 'subject specialist described. Each library is classified in one of five categories - functional, dual, hybrid, 3-tier, subject divisional - according to the form of subject specialization (if any) practised. The range of functions commonly performed on a subject basis is considered. Factors which influence the adoption and implementation of subject specialization are discussed. These include relations with library users, work satisfaction and promotion prospects, the availability of suitably qualified staff and the relevance of subject qualifications, tensions between subject and functional activities, and the significance of automation and economic considerations. Most of the reservations expressed about subject specialization were practical rather than ideological.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
