A model of "library learning" is put forward, designed to help identify the distinctive contribution of libraries to learning. The model is based on an analysis of common elements which emerge from a selective review of recent research and practical developments in the field of librarianship and learning. The review deals with four areas-library stock, library use, how students learn and what students learn. Elements common to the four areas are then discussed, and combined to form a model of "library learning".
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ford, Nigel.Cognitive psychology and "library learning" . Journal of Librarianship, II (I) 1979.
2.
Waite, Clifford, and Colebourn, Ronald.Not by books alone. London , School Library Association, 1975 .
3.
Enright, B.J.New media and the library in education. London, Bingley, 1972.
4.
University Grants Committee. Capital provision for university libraries (Atkinson Report). I976.
5.
Pastukhov, V.M.Questions of assimilating knowledge and information . Scientific and Technical Information Processing, (3) 1976, 18-25. Translated from Russian (LISA abstract 77/2664).
6.
Rice, Barbara A.The development of working collections in university libraries. College and Research Libraries, 38 (4) 1977, 309-312.
Merritt, John E.Wbat shall we teach? London, Ward Lock Educational, 1974.
9.
Cowan, John.Will librarians lead or be left behind? Library Association Record, 80 (2) 1978, 61.
10.
Bono, Edward de.Lateral thinking and indexing. Indexer, II (2) 1978.
11.
Nuffield Foundation.Group for Research and Innovation in Higher Education. Newsletters1-7. London, Nuffield Foundation, 1973 -1976.
12.
Clarke, John.Learning resources for an institution of higher education. A feasibility study. Dundee College of Education , 1978. (Dundee College of Education case study.)
13.
Mitchell, P. David.Operational research in a learning resources centre. An application of queueing theory. In Howe, Anne, and Romiszowski, A. J. (eds). International yearbook of educational and instructional technology I976. London, Kogan Page.
14.
Dranov, Paula.Automated library circulation systems, 1977-78 . White Plains, New York, Knowledge Industry Publications, 1977.
15.
De Hart, Florence E.The library-college and graduate library education . Journal of cducation for librarianship, 1970, 298-301.
16.
Gossage, Wayne.The American library college movement to I968: the library as curriculum, and teaching with books. Education Libraries Bullctin, 18 (2), 1975, I-21.
17.
Goodlad, Sinclair (ed.). The use of project methods in higher education. London, Society for Research into Higher Education, 1975.
18.
Goldshmid, G. , and Goldschmid, M.L.Individualizing instruction in higher education: a review. Higher Education, 3, 1974, I-24.
19.
Hills, P.J.The self-teaching process in higher education. London, Croom Helm, 1976.
Saunders, W. L. (ed.). British librarianship today. London, Library Association , 1976.
22.
Winkworth, F.V.User education in schools: a survey of the literature on education for library and information use in schools. BLRD Report 539I.
23.
Stevenson, M.B.User education programmes: a study of their development, organisation, methods and assessment. BLRD Report 5320.
24.
Urquhart, J.A. , and Schofield, J.L.Measuring readers' failure at the shelf in three university libraries. Journal of Documentation, 28, 1972, 233-241.
25.
Pritchard, A. , and Auckland, M.Library effectiveness I974. City of London Polytechnic, Library and Learning Resources Service, 1974.
26.
McGarry, K.J.Communication knowledge and the librarian. London, Bingley, 1975.
27.
Mann, Peter Henry.Books and undergraduates: proceedings of a conference held at Royal Holloway College, University of London, 4th-6th July 1975. London, National Book League, 1976 .
28.
Ford, Nigel.Study strategies, orientations and "personal meaningfulness" in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1979 (in press).
29.
Craik, F.I.M. , and Lockhart, R.S.Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour , II, 1972, 671-684.
30.
Marton, F., and Saljo, R.On qualitative differences in learning. I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Education Psychology, 46, 1976, 4-II.
31.
Biggs, J.B.Dimensions of study behaviour: another look at ATI. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 1976, 68-80.
32.
Open University. Cognitive styles. Milton Keynes, Open University, I976. (Course E20I, Block 5.)
Pask, G.Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 1976, 128-148.
35.
Deci, Edward L.Intrinsic motivation. New York, Plenum Press, 1975.
36.
Hiller, C., and Parlett, M.Up to the mark: a study of the examination game. London , Society for Research into Higher Education, 1974.
37.
Atkinson, J.W. , and Feather, N.T.A theory of achievement motivation. New York, Wiley, 1966.
38.
Entwistle, Noel J., and Wilson, John D.Degrees of excellence: the academic achievement game. London, Hodder & Stoughton , 1977.
39.
Phares, E. Jerry.Locus of control in personality. Morriston (N.J.), Central Learning Press, 1976.
40.
Cronbach, L.J. , and Snow, R.E.Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York, Irvington Press, 1977.
41.
Perry, W.G.Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme . New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.
42.
Hefferman, J.M.An analytical framework for planning and research in higher education. Liberal Education, 61, 1975, 493-503.
43.
Entwistle, Noel.How students learn: information processing, intellectual development and confrontation. Higher Education Bulletin, 3 (3) 1975.
44.
Jamison, Dean , Suppes, Patrick, and Wells, Stuart. The effectiveness of alternative instructional media: a survey. Review of Educational Research, 44, 1974, I-67.
45.
Wells, Stuart.Evaluation and the criteria effectiveness of instructional technology in higher education. Higher Education , 5, 1976, 253-275.
46.
Clark, R.E., and Snow, R.E.Alternative designs for instructional technology research. AV Communication Review, 23, 1975, 373-394.
47.
Becker, Anne De Vaney.Alternate methodologies for instructional media research. AV Communication Review, 25, 1977, 151-194.
48.
Heidt, E.U.Media and the individual learner: trait-treatment interaction and the concept of supplantation. In Clarke, John, and Leedham, John (eds). Editcational technology for individualised learning. London, Kogan Page, 1976. (Aspects of educational technology, I0.)
49.
Baron, Jonathan.Some theories of college instruction. Higher Education, 4, 1975, 149-172.
50.
Bloom, Benjamin S. (ed.). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. London, Longman, 1956.
51.
Krathwohl, D.R. , et al. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook II: Affective domain. London, Longman, 1964.
52.
Steinaker, Norman , and Bell, Robert.The experimental taxonomy: a fresh approach to teaching and learning. In Howe, Anne, and Romiszowski, A. J. (eds). International yearbook of educational and instructional technology I978/79, London, Kogan Page, 1978, 71-77.
53.
Gray, Charles , and Pierce, Walter D.Educational objectives and the learning domains: a new formulation and summary: Pierce-Gray classification model for the cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains. ERIC document ED I5I 243.
54.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research . Reading (Mass.), Addison-Wesley , 1975.
55.
Stanton, H.E.Self-concept change through a microteaching experience. British Journnl of Teacher Education, 4(2) 1978, 119-123.
56.
Maehr, M.L.Continuing motivation: an analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Review of Educational Research , 46 (3) 1976,443-462.
57.
Nehari, M., and Bender, H.Meaningfulness of a learning experience: a measure for educational outcomes in higher education. Higher Education, 7, 1978, I-II.
58.
Rogers, C.Freedom to learn. Columbus (Ohio ), Merrill, 1969.
59.
Groves, Jane.The Lancaster School of Independent Studies . In Nuffield Foundation.Group for Research and Innovation in Higher Education. Towards independence in learning. London, Nuffield Foundation , 1975, paper 5: 4.
60.
Stephenson, John.General competence by independent study. In Billing, David (ed.). Course design and student learning. Guildford, Society for Research into Higher Education, 1978. (Papers presented at the thirteenth annual conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education I977.)
61.
Wiegel, Walter.Cost effectiveness in resource-based learning . (Paper presented at the ICEM/APLET conference "The Impact of Resource-based Learning", Glasgow, 7-10 April 1974 . Unpublished.)
62.
Hudson, L.Frames of mind. London, Methuen , 1968.
63.
Eraut, M.Should curriculum decisions be made "for" the independent learner? In Furniss, B. S., and Parsonage, J. R. (eds). Independent learning in tertiary science education. London, Thames Polytechnic, 1975, I-17.
64.
Surridge, R., and Bowen, J.The independent learning project. A study of cbanging attitudes in American public libraries. Public Libraries Research Group, 1977. (British Library R. and D. Report 5396.)
65.
Davies, T.Charles. Open learning systems for mature students. London , Council for Educational Technology, 1977. (CET working paper I4.)
