Scientists and Social Scientists as Information Users: a comparison of results of science user studies with the investigation into information requirements of the social sciences
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 1973
Scientists and Social Scientists as Information Users: a comparison of results of science user studies with the investigation into information requirements of the social sciences
This paper seeks to draw generalized profiles of a scientist and a social scientist as an information user. The profilts are based rrpon the results of a selection of science user studies and the Investigation into Information Requirements of the Social Sciences (INFROSS). The problems encountered in comparind user studies are discussed. On the whole scientists and social scientists do not differ to any large extent in their information seeking behaviour. They both use similar information sources, similiar methods to retrieve information and both experience similiar problems in dealing with information. However, the extent of use of different methods and the degrees of problem created do vary and account for the differences in the information seeking behaviour of scientists and social scientists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Skelton, B.Comparison of results of science user studies with 'Investigation into information requirements of the social sciences'. (DISISS working paper no. I). Bath, University of Bath Library, 1971.
2.
Bath University.Investigation into information requirements of the social sciences. Research Reports I-5. Bath, University of Bath Library, 1971.
3.
Paisley, W.J.Information needs and users. In: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 3, 1968, I-30.
4.
Brittain, J.M.Information and its users: a review with special reference to the social sciences . Bath, Bath University Press, 1970, 13.
5.
Paisley, W.J.The flow of (behavioral) science information: a review of the research literature . Palo Alto, Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research, 1965.
6.
Menzel, H.Review of studies in the flow of information among scientists. New York, Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Social Research, 1960.
7.
Barnes, R.C.M.Information use studies, part 2: comparison of some recent surveys. J. Docum., 21 (3) September 1965, 169-176.
8.
Urquhart, D.J. (communicated by) Physics abstracting—use and users. J. Docum., 2 (2) June 1965, 113-121.
9.
Advisory Council on Scientific Policy.Survey of information needs of physicists and chemists. J. Docum., 21 (2) June 1965, 83-112.
10.
Fishenden, R.M.Methods by which research workers find information . Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 1958. Washington, D.C., National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, 1959. Vol. I, 163-179.
11.
Martyn, J.Report of an investigation on literature searching by research students. London, Aslib, 1964.
12.
Barnes, R.C.M.Some recent investigations into information use at AERE, Harwell. In: Looking forward in documentation; papers and discussions, 38th Aslib Annual Conference, Exeter. London, Aslib, 1964, 4-I—4-5.
13.
Barber, A.S.A critical review of the surveys of scientists' use of libraries. In: Saunders W. L. ed. The provision and use of library and documentation services. London, Pergamon, 1966.
14.
Glass, B. and Norwood, S.H.How scientists actually learn of work important to them. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 1958. Washington, D.C., National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, 1959 . Vol. I, 195-197.
15.
Menzel, H.Planned and unplanned scientific communication. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 1958. Washington, D.C., National Academy of Science—National Research Council, 1959 . Vol. I, 199-243.
16.
Slater, M. and Keenan, S.Results of a questionnaire on current awareness methods used by physicists prior to publication of Current Papers in Physics. London and New York, The Institution of Electrical Engineers and American Institute of Physics, 1967.
17.
Scott, C.The use of technical literature by industrial technologists. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information , 1958. Washington, D.C., National Academy of Science—National Research Council, 1959. Vol. I, 244-266.
18.
Hogg, I.H. and Smith, J.R.Information and literature use in a research and development organization . Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 1958. Washington, D.C., National Academy of Science—National Research Council, 1959. Vol. I, 131-162.
19.
Herner, S.Information gathering habits of workers in pure and applied science. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 46 (I) January, 1954, 228-236.
20.
Auerbach Corporation.DoD user needs study—phase 1. Final technical report. Philadelphia. 1965 (AD 6I550I).
21.
Parker, E.B. and Paisley, W.J.Research for psychologists at the interface of the scientist and his information system. Amer. Psychologist, 21 (II) November 1966, 1061-1071.
22.
Borko, H.Determining user requirements for an information storage and retrieval system: a systems approach. In: Bourne C.P. ed. Information systems workshop. Washington, Spartan Books, 1962, 37-60.
23.
Bourne, C.P.A review of the methodology of information system design. In: Bourne C.P. ed., Information systems workshop . Washington, Spartan Books, 1962, II-33.
24.
Herner, S.The information gathering habits of American medical students. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information , 1958. Washington, D.C., National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, 1959. Vol. I, 277-285.
25.
Bath University.Experimental Information Officer in the Social Sciences 1969-71. Final Report. Bath, University of Bath Library, 1972.
26.
Wood, D.N.The foreign language problem facing scientists and technologists in the United Kingdom: report of a recent survey. J. Docum., 23 (2) June 1967, 117-130.
27.
Hutchins, W.J. , Pargeter, L.J., and Saunders , W.L.The language barrier: a study in depth of the place of foreign language materials in the research activity of an academic community. Postgraduate School of Librarianship and Information Science, University of Sheffield, 1971.
