Rebuttal to Winn et al. (2024) ’s “Redefining searching in non-medical sciences systematic reviews”

Aloe AM Dewidar O Hennessy EA , et al. (2024) Campbell standards: Modernizing Campbell’s methodologic expectations for Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR). Campbell Systematic Reviews 20(4): e1445. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1445.

Aromataris E Lockwood C Porritt K , et al. (2024) JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. Available at: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global (accessed 26 March, 2025).

Boeker M Vach W Motschall E (2013) Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: Good relative recall and precision are not enough. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-131.

Booth A (2010) How much searching is enough? Comprehensive versus optimal retrieval for technology assessments. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 26(4): 431–435. DOI: 10.1017/s0266462310000966

Bramer WM (2016) Variation in number of hits for complex searches in Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA 104(2): 143–145. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2016.61.

Bramer WM Giustini D Kramer BM , et al. (2013) The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: A review of searches used in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews 2(1): 1–9.

Bramer WM Rethlefsen ML Kleijnen J , et al. (2017) Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews 6(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y.

Chapman K (2021) Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences. Journal of Academic Librarianship 47(5): 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102396.

COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics (2019) Retraction guidelines. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/guidance/guideline/retraction-guidelines (accessed 26 March 2025).

Giustini D Boulos MNK (2013) Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics 5(2): 1–9. DOI: 10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4623.

Higgins J Thomas J Chandler J , et al. (2024) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.5 (Updated August 2024). Cochrane. Available at: https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook (accessed 26 March 2025).

Pozsgai G Lövei GL Vasseur L , et al. (2021) Irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature: A comparative analysis. Ecology and Evolution 11(21): 14658–14668. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8154.

Slebodnik M Pardon K Hermer J (2022) Who’s publishing systematic reviews? An examination beyond the Health Sciences. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Fall (101). DOI: 10.29173/istl2671.

Smartsearch (2024) Compare databases—Search Smart—The best academic databases. Available at: https://www.searchsmart.org/compare?~(pinned~(~%27googlescholar~%27worldcat.articlechapter~%27cnki.overseas)) (accessed 26 March 2025).

Winn JG Hao T Hardaway JW , et al. (2025) Redefining searching in non-medical sciences systematic reviews: The ascendance of Google Scholar as the primary database. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 57(3): 964–973. DOI: 10.1177/0961000624125639

Winn JG Oh H Hao T (2024b) Google Scholar for ES. OSF. Available at: https://osf.io/ncm6d/ (accessed 28 March 2025).