Guided by a conceptual framework based on the baseline data literacy competencies (DLCs) mapped to the ACRL information literacy framework and the extended technology acceptance model, this study uses an online survey to investigate the factors related to student users’ potential acceptance of library data services supporting DLCs in a master’s college environment. With quantitative and qualitative data analyses, the study builds three conceptual models to demonstrate how students’ study-related data engagement and backgrounds may influence their attitudes toward multi-aspect library data services, including general data services, an institutional data repository, if available, as a data resource, and institutional data repository-based services. The study’s findings support library data services’ cross-disciplinary, multidimensional, and multilevel nature, addressing the value of institutional data repositories and repository-based data services in comprehensively promoting data literacy competencies of all groups in all disciplines. The contribution of this study, beyond being among the first to look at library data services from a holistic perspective to support college students’ DLCs, includes a call for further explorations of student data engagement practice and verifying and generalizing the current study findings by investigating more students’ data services need in more college communities.
AjzenI (2020) The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies2(4): 314–324.
3.
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (2015) Framework for information literacy for higher education. Available at: www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed 13 March 2023).
4.
BeauchampAMurrayC (2016) Teaching foundational data skills in the library. In: KellamLMThompsonK (eds) Databrarianship: The Academic Data Librarian in Theory and Practice. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, pp.81–92.
5.
BermanEA (2017) An exploratory sequential mixed methods approach to understanding researchers’ data management practices at UVM: Integrated findings to develop research data services. Journal of eScience Librarianship6(1): e1104.
6.
BrodskyM (2017) Understanding data literacy requirements for assignments: A business school syllabus study. International Journal of Librarianship2(1): 3–15.
7.
BurressT (2022) Data literacy practices of students conducting undergraduate research. College & Research Libraries83(3): 434–451.
8.
Burton-JonesAHubonaGS (2006) The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information Management43(6): 706–717.
9.
Calzada PradoJMarzalMÁ (2013) Incorporating data literacy into information literacy programs: Core competencies and contents. Libri63(2): 123–134.
10.
ChinWW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research295(2): 295–336.
11.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
12.
CondonPExlineEBuckleyL (2023) Data literacy in the Social Sciences: Findings from a local study on teaching with quantitative data in undergraduate courses. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice18(1): 61–75.
13.
CondonPBPothierWG (2022) Advancing data literacy: Mapping business data literacy competencies to the ACRL framework. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship27(2): 104–126.
14.
CoxAMKennanMALyonL, et al (2017) Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology68(9): 2182–2200.
15.
CoxAMKennanMALyonL, et al (2019) Maturing research data services and the transformation of academic libraries. The Journal of Documentation75(6): 1432–1462.
16.
CoxAMPinfieldS (2014) Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science46(4): 299–316.
17.
DavisFD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly13(3): 319–340.
18.
FedererLMLuYLJoubertDJ (2016) Data literacy training needs of biomedical researchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA104(1): 52–57.
19.
FontichiaroKOehrliJA (2016) Why data literacy matters. Knowledge Quest44(5): 21–27.
20.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
21.
GummerESMandinachEB (2015) Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record117(4): 1–22.
22.
GussS (2016) A studio model for academic data services. In: KellamLMThompsonK (eds) Databrarianship: The Academic Data Librarian in Theory and Practice. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries Press, pp.9–24.
23.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Pearson.
24.
JeffersonCOStierholzKFontichiaroK, et al (2020) Considering data literacy using Kuhlthau’s information search process: Implications for librarians and data providers. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship25(3–4): 197–229.
25.
JooYKKimY (2017) Engineering researchers’ data reuse behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach. The Electronic Library35(6): 1141–1161.
26.
KoltayT (2017) Data literacy for researchers and data librarians. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science49(1): 3–14.
27.
KoltayT (2022) Research Data Management and Data Literacies. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing.
28.
KuglitschRZ (2015) Teaching for transfer: Reconciling the Framework with Disciplinary Information Literacy. Portal (Baltimore, Md15(3): 457–470.
29.
Lafferty-HessSRudderJDowneyM, et al (2020) Conceptualizing data curation activities within two academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication8(1): eP2347.
30.
LopattoD (2017) Adapting to change: Studying undergraduate research in the current education environment. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research1(1): 5–10.
31.
PothierWGCondonPB (2020) Towards data literacy competencies: Business students, workforce needs, and the role of the librarian. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship25(3–4): 123–146.
32.
RidsdaleCRothwellJSmitM, et al (2015) Strategies and best practices for data literacy education: Knowledge synthesis report (Report). Dalhousie University. Available at: https://dalspace.library.dal.ca//handle/10222/64578 (accessed 13 March 2023).
33.
SchaubGMinnisS (2021) Ithaka S+ R: Teaching with data in the social sciences. Scholarly Papers and Articles69. Available at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/library_sp/69 (accessed 12 October 2022).
TaberKS (2018) The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education48: 1273–1296.
TenopirCTaljaSHorstmannW, et al (2017) Research data services in European academic research libraries. LIBER Quarterly27(1): 23–44.
39.
ThomasCUrbanR (2018) What do data librarians think of the MLIS? Professionals’ perceptions of knowledge transfer, trends and challenges. College & Research Libraries79(3): 401–423.
40.
ThompsonKYinS (2017) The development of academic data services in Canada and China: Profiles of data services at Fudan University and the University of Windsor. International Journal of Librarianship2(1): 73–78.
41.
UsovaTLawsR (2021) Teaching a one-credit course on data literacy and data visualisation. Journal of Information Literacy15(1): 84–95.
42.
VenkateshVDavisFD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science46(2): 186–204.
43.
VenkateshVMorrisMGDavisGB, et al (2003) User Acceptance of information technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly27(3): 425–478.
44.
VenkateshVThongJYXuX (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly36(1): 157–178.
45.
WhitmireALBoockMSuttonSC (2015) Variability in academic research data management practices: Implications for data services development from a faculty survey. Program Electronic Library and Information Systems49(4): 382–407.
46.
WolffAGoochDCavero MontanerJJ, et al (2016) Creating an understanding of data literacy for a data-driven society. The Journal of Community Informatics12(3): 9–26.
47.
YoonADonaldsonDR (2019) Library capacity for data curation services: A US national survey. Library Hi Tech37(4): 811–828.
