Perceived values to personal digital archives and their relationship to archiving behaviours: An exploratory research based on grounded theory

Abstract

Personal digital archiving (PDA) is a type of personal information behaviour related to personal memory and identity construction. The aim of this study is to discover and define individual’s perceived values in relation to personal digital archives, and to explore their relationship between PDA behaviours. Based on the grounded theory, drawing on in-depth interviews with 14 Chinese college students, both the perceived values in relation to personal digital archives and the PDA behaviours were coded through open, axial, and selective coding processes. This study found the perceived values in relation to personal digital archives mainly include subject value, object value, intermediary value, value to other subjects and social value, PDA behaviours mainly include accumulation behaviour, use behaviour, appraisal behaviour and disposal behaviour. Moreover, the value cognition of personal digital archives is the intermediary link between perceived values and PDA behaviours and is the core connecting the two. Value cognition can be divided into judgement on whether personal digital archives are valuable, subdivision of value types of personal digital archives, value evaluation of personal digital archives, and cognition of enhancing or weakening the value of personal digital archives. The study comprehensively analysed the perceived values, value cognition that drive PDA behaviours, built the relationship between perceived values, value cognition and PDA behaviours, and answered the question of why individuals want to archive from cognitive and behavioural perspectives. The findings of the study can help librarians to conduct more targetted PDA education and improve the public’s awareness and literacy in PDA.

Keywords

archival value digital literacy grounded theory information behaviour perceived value personal digital archiving value cognitive

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali

Warraich

(2022) Modeling the process of personal digital archiving through ubiquitous and desktop devices: A systematic review. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 54(1): 132–143.

Alon

Nachmias

(2020) Anxious and frustrated but still competent: Affective aspects of interactions with personal information management. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 144: 102503.

Bass

(2013) A PIM perspective: Leveraging personal information management research in the archiving of personal digital records. Archivaria April: 49–76.

Becker

Nogues

(2012) Saving-over, over-saving, and the future mess of writers’ digital archives: A survey report on the personal digital archiving practices of emerging writers. The American Archivist 75(2): 482–513.

Bell

Gemmell

(2007) A digital life. Scientific American 296(3): 58–65.

Bergman

Whittaker

(2016) The Science of Managing Our Digital Stuff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Besser

(2015) Personal digital archiving: issues for libraries and a summary of the PDA conference. In: IFLA WLIC 2015-in Session 197-audiovisual and multimedia with acquisition and collection development, Cape Town, South Africa.

Cannelli

Musso

(2022) Social media as part of personal digital archives: exploring users’ practices and service providers’ policies regarding the preservation of digital memories. Archival Science 22(2): 259–283.

Chen

(2010) How determinant attributes of service quality influence customer-perceived value: an empirical investigation of the Australian coffee outlet industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 22(4): 535–551.

10.

Chen

Chang

(2016) Discussion on some theoretical issues of personal archiving from the perspective of archival acience. Archives & Construction 3: 8–11.

11.

Condron

(2019) Identifying individual and institutional motivations in personal digital archiving. Preservation Digital Technology & Culture 48(1): 28–37.

12.

Corbin

Strauss

(1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13(1): 3–21.

13.

Cushing

(2010) Highlighting the archives perspective in the personal digital archiving discussion. Library Hi Tech 28(2): 301–312.

14.

Cushing

(2013) It’s stuff that speaks to me: exploring the characteristics of digital possessions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(8): 1723–1734.

15.

Czerwinski

Gage

Gemmell

, et al. (2006) Digital memories in an era of ubiquitous computing and abundant storage. Communications of the ACM 49(1): 44–50.

16.

District of Columbia Public Library (2022) The memory lab. Available at: https://www.dclibrary.org/labs/memorylab (accessed 18 August 2022).

17.

Duan

(2018) Investigation and strategy research on personal digital archiving of college students in China-take the master students at Wuhan University as an example. Master`s Thesis, Wuhan University, China.

18.

Feng

(2018) The behaviour and willingness of personal digital archiving of Chinese university students. Archives Science Bulletin 243(5): 13–17.

19.

Glaser

Strauss

Strutzel

(1968) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Nursing Research 17(4): 364.

20.

Gunn

(2019) The personal digital archiving conference: Looking back at 2018 and ahead to 2019. Preservation Digital Technology & Culture 48(1): 3–5.

21.

Guo

(2018) An empirical study on the mediating effect of personal digital archiving behaviourBased on a random questionnaire survey of Chinese netizens. Archives Science Bulletin 243(5): 17–25.

22.

Hsiao

(2022) Post-purchase behaviour from customer perceived value of mobile payment services. Journal of Modelling in Management 17: 1524–1543.

23.

Huang

Zhong

(2021) Development and empirical study of a personal archiving dilemma scale. Library and Information Service 65(17): 101–109.

24.

Jones

Pirolli

Card

, et al. (2006) “It’s about the information stupid!”: why we need a separate field of human-information interaction. In: CHI06: CHI 2006 conference on human factors in computing systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 22–27 April 2006, pp.65–68. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

25.

Kaye

Vertesi

Avery

, et al. (2006) To have and to hold: exploring the personal archive. In: CHI06: CHI 2006 conference on human factors in computing systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 22–27 April 2006, pp.275–284. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

26.

Kim

(2013a) Personal Digital Archives: Preservation of Documents, Preservation of Self. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. USA: The University of Texas at Austin.

27.

Kim

(2013b) ndscape of personal digital archiving activities and research. Personal Archiving: Preserving Our Digital Heritage, Information Today: Medford 153–85.

28.

Kim

(2013c) The results of one scholar’s survey: what are your plans for your personal digital archives?. Library of Congress. Available at: https://blogs.loc.gov/thesignal/2012/03/the-results-of-one-scholars-survey-what-are-your-plans-for-your-personal-digital-archives/ (accessed 18 August 2022).

29.

King

(2018) Personal digital archiving for journalists: A ‘private’ solution to a public problem. Library Hi Tech 36(4): 573–582.

30.

Krtalic

Ihejirika

(2023) The things we carry: Migrants’ personal collection management and use. Journal of Documentation 79: 86–111. DOI: 10.1108/jd-12-2021-0236

31.

Krtalic

Marcetic

Micunovic

(2016) Personal digital information archiving among students of social sciences and humanities. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal 21(2): 19.

32.

Kuehlwein

(1998) The Cognitive Therapy Model. Paradigms of Clinical Social Work. London: Routledge.

33.

Lee

(2011) I Digital: Personal Collections in the Digital Era. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists.

34.

Lewin

(2015) Principles of Topological Psychology. Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books, pp.11–12.

35.

Lindroth

Bergquist

(2008) Breadcrumbs of interaction: situating personal information management. In: Proceedings of the 5th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Building bridges, Lund, Sweden, 20–22 October 2008, pp.266–273. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

36.

Marčetić

(2015) Exploring the methods and practises of personal digital information archiving among the student population. ProInflow 7(1): 29–40.

37.

Marshall

(2008) Rethinking personal digital archiving, part 1: Four challenges from the field. D-Lib Magazine 14(3/4): 2.

38.

Marshall

Bly

Brun-Cottan

(2006) The long term fate of our digital belongings: toward a service model for personal archives. Archiving Conference 2006(1): 25-30.

39.

Nesmith

(2007) The concept of societal provenance and records of nineteenth-century Aboriginal–European relations in western Canada: Implications for archival theory and practice. Archival Science 6(3-4): 351–360.

40.

Ofori

Anyigba

Adeola

, et al. (2022) Understanding post-adoption behaviour in the context of ride-hailing apps: The role of customer perceived value. Information Technology and People 35(5): 1540–1562.

41.

Rozhneva

Ostashova

(2018) The academic community’s personal archiving practices: The case of National Research Tomsk State University. Sibirskie Istoricheskie Issledovaniya 4(4): 146–173.

42.

Schoenebeck

Conway

(2020) Data and power: Archival appraisal theory as a framework for data preservation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4(CSCW2): 1–18.

43.

Seifi

Saffari

Younesi

(2018) Value oriented thinking style impact on personal documents digital archiving. Ganjine-ye Asnad 28(3): 148–165.

44.

Sinn

Kim

Syn

(2017) Personal digital archiving: Influencing factors and challenges to practices. Library Hi Tech 35(2): 222–239.

45.

Society of American Archivists (2022) Personal digital archiving. Available at: https://dictionary.archivists.org/entry/personal-digital-archiving.html (accessed 18 August 2022).

46.

State Library of North Carolina (2022) Personal digital archiving. Available at: https://statelibrary.ncdcr.gov/research/digital-information-management/personal-digital-archiving (accessed 18 August 2022).

47.

Strauss

Corbin

(1997) Introduction to Qualitative Research. China: Juliu Books Company.

48.

Williams

Leighton John

Rowland

(2009) The personal curation of digital objects: A lifecycle approach. Aslib Proceedings 61(4): 340–363.

49.

Witmer

(2020) “Digital archiving” research guides. Available at: https://guides.lib.umich.edu/c.php?g=992751 (accessed 1 December 2022).

50.

Yeo

Lee

(2014) Exploring new potentials of blogs for learning: Can children use blogs for personal information management (PIM)? British Journal of Educational Technology 45(5): 916–925.

51.

Zeithaml

(1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52(3): 2–22.

52.

Zhang

(2000) Systematic structure of archives value cognition. Archives Science Bulletin 2: 20–23.

53.

Zhao

Duan

Yang

(2019) Postgraduates’ personal digital archiving practices in China: Problems and strategies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 45(5): 102044.

54.

Zhou

Huang

Wang

(2020a) Research on influencing factors of personal digital archiving willingness based on cognitive load theory. Archives Science Bulletin 3: 12–19.

55.

Zhou

Liu

(2020b) Research on influencing factors of personal digital archiving behaviour of college students. Archives Science Study 1: 52–58.

56.

Zhou

Huang

Wang

(2019) Research on influencing factors of personal digital archive object selection behaviour. Archives Science Study 3: 106–112.