Status of open access scholarly journal publishing in Pakistan

Abstract

Open access (OA) scholarly journal publishing is a recently emerged phenomenon of scholarly publishing in Pakistan. This study has been designed to find out the current status of open access (OA) scholarly journal publishing in Pakistan. A quantitative research method was used to evaluate the contents of the websites of 329 Pakistani journals on a checklist of 12 items. OA publishing paradigm has emerged in Pakistan as a majority (90%) of Pakistani scholarly journals are following the OA publishing paradigm. More than two-thirds (69%) of journals are following the Diamond OA model, followed by Gold OA (26%) and Crowdfunding OA (3%). The majority (97%) of journals belongs to the Y (the lowest) category of journals and the majority (97%) of journals do not have an impact factor. Indexing in Scopus and Web of Science is 24 (16%) and 20 (13%), respectively. Average article processing charges (APCs) per article in Sciences and Social Sciences journals of Pakistan are 46 $ and 90 $, respectively. In terms of ranking, Pakistani journals are in the stage of infancy. The present study is the first comprehensive exploration to explore the current status of OA scholarly journal publishing in Pakistan. This study may help to come up with recommendations to strengthen the credibility of OA journals in Pakistan. This study may be generalized to developing countries that have similar circumstances to Pakistan.

Keywords

Indexing in Scopus and WOS journal impact factor OA journal publishing open access open access publishing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

(2006) Open access: Implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association 94(3): 253–262.

Asai

(2019) Changes in revenue structure of a leading open-access journal publisher: The case of BMC. Scientometrics 121(1): 53–63.

Asai

(2020) The market power of publishers in setting article processing charges for open access journals. Scientometrics 123(2): 1037–1049.

Asai

(2021) Collaboration between research institutes and large and small publishers for publishing open access journals. Scientometrics 126(6): 5245–5262.

Bernius

Hanauske

Konig

, et al. (2009) Open access models and their implications for the players in the scientific publishing market. Economic Analysis and Policy 39(1): 103–115.

Björk

(2017) Open access to scientific articles: A review of benefits and challenges. Internal and Emergency Medicine 12(2): 247–253.

Boissy

Schatz

(2011) Scholarly communications from the publisher’s perspective. Journal of Library Administration 51(5–6): 476–484.

Dandawate

Dhanmjaya

(2021) Open access initiatives in western Asia. Slavic & East European Information Resources 22(1): 85–103.

DOAJ (2022) Directory of open access journals. Available at: https://doaj.org/ (accessed 20 September 2022).

10.

Dunn

Abelson

Bourg

, et al. (2018) Open Access at MIT and Beyond: A White Paper of the MIT Ad Hoc Task Force on Open Access to MIT’s Research. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

11.

European Commission (2014) Open access. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=openaccess (accessed 15 October 2020).

12.

European Science Media Hub (2019) Europe leads the way in the transition to open access publishing: What is at stake? Available at: https://sciencemediahub.eu/2019/10/23/europe-leads-the-way-in-the-transition-to-open-access-publishing-what-is-at-stake/ (accessed 22 September 2021).

13.

Gaule

Maystre

(2011) Getting cited: Does open access help? Research Policy 40(10): 1332–1338.

14.

Grech

Rizk

(2018) The increasing importance of research metrics: Journal Impact Factor and h-index. International Urogynecology Journal 29(5): 619–620.

15.

Gross

Ryan

(2015) Landscapes of research: Perceptions of Open Access (OA) publishing in the arts and humanities. Publications 3(2): 65–88.

16.

Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (2019) HEC recognized journals. Available at: https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/services/faculty/journals/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 29 November 2019).

17.

Jubb

Goldstein

Amin

, et al. (2015) Monitoring the transition to open access: A report for the Universities UK open access coordination group. Technical report, Research Information Network, UK, August.

18.

Laakso

(2014) Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: A study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 99(2): 475–494.

19.

Ministry of IT and Telecom (2018) Digital Pakistan policy. Available at: http://moib.gov.pk/Downloads/Policy/digital_pakistan_policy(22-05-2018).pdf

20.

Misra

Agarwal

(2019) Open access publishing in India: Coverage, relevance, and future perspectives. Journal of Korean Medical Science 34(27): e180.

21.

Open Society Institute (2002) Budapest open access initiative (BOAI). Available at: https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read

22.

Qutab

(2012) Open access movement in Pakistan. Trends in Information Management (TRIM): 4(1): 38–51.

23.

Reinsfelder

Pike

(2018) Using library funds to support open access publishing through crowdfunding: Going beyond article processing charges. Collection Management 43(2): 138–149.

24.

Sheikh

(2017) Faculty awareness, use, and attitudes towards scholarly open access: A Pakistani perspective. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51(3): 612–628.

25.

Sheikh

(2020) The international open access movement and its status in Pakistan. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 20(1): 15–31.

26.

Shen

(2017) Open access scholarly journal publishing in Chinese. Publications 5(4): 22–28.

27.

Sunny (2022a) Indian journals indexed in web of science – 2022. Available at: https://phdtalks.org/2021/05/indian-journals-indexed-in-web-of-science-2021.html (accessed 15 May 2022).

28.

Sunny (2022b) Indian journals indexed in Scopus – 2022. Available at: https://phdtalks.org/2021/05/list-of-indian-journals-indexed-in-scopus-2021.html

29.

Ul Haq Akhoon

Ganaie

Khazir

(2018) Research data management in open access journals by developed countries a comparative study between the United States of America and the United Kingdom. In: 2018 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS), Noida, India, 21–23 February 2018, pp. 116–120). New York, NY: IEEE.