The individual characteristics,organizational characteristics and research productivity of early career LIS researchers in China’s mainland: A crisp set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA)

Abstract

There existed discrimination, including gender discrimination, first degree discrimination, etc., when assessing the future research productivity of PhD graduates in recruitment in China’s mainland. Were PhD students who did not possess certain conditions (e.g. first degree receiving from a non-key university) unable to achieve high research productivity after graduation? Previous studies focused on the “net effects” of individual and organizational characteristics on research productivity by using quantitative methods (e.g. regression analysis). However, researchers’ research productivity might be due to the interactions of multiple factors rather than a single factor. This study aimed to analyze the effects of the combined conditions (interactions) of individual and organizational characteristics on the research productivity of early career library and information science (LIS) researchers under the context of employment discrimination in the academic job market of China’s mainland. Early career LIS researchers who graduated from China’s mainland universities/institutions between 2011 and 2015 were selected as the sample (n = 62). csQCA was employed to analyze the data. The results revealed that the effects of a single condition did not directly contribute to the occurrence of high research productivity. There were two combinations of conditions that could contribute to the high research productivity of early career LIS researchers. The first combination that contributed to the high research productivity of an early career LIS researcher was receiving his or her bachelor’s degree from a key university, publishing higher than the median number of articles indexed by Web of Science core collections (WOS) during their PhD and working in a key university after PhD graduation. The second combination was being male, publishing more than the median number of articles indexed by the WOS and the local core journals index during their PhD, and working at a key university after PhD graduation.

Keywords

Doctoral supervisor employment discrimination first degree gender prestige of affiliation research productivity study abroad

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akbaritabar

Casnici

Squazzoni

(2018) The conundrum of research productivity: A study on sociologists in Italy. Scientometrics 114(3): 859–882.

Albahari

Bashir

(2020) Gender gap in mental health research productivity: Results from Qatar. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 54: 102347.

Amara

Landry

Halilem

(2015) What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics 103(2): 489–530.

Anderson

Campbell

Grady

, et al (2020) Transitioning back to faculty roles after being a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholar: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Professional Nursing 36(5): 377–385.

Baloch

Siming

Abraha

, et al (2021) Faculty research productivity: Differences between foreign and local doctoral degree holders in Pakistan. Higher Education 82(1): 203–225.

Behmer Hansen

Silva

Cuevas

, et al (2020) Fellowship, gender, and scholarly productivity: Trends among academic neurosurgeons in the US. Journal of Neurosurgery 135(1): 1–9.

Blackman

Wistow

Byrne

(2013) Using Qualitative comparative analysis to understand complex policy problems. Evaluation 19(2): 126–140.

Bland

Center

Finstad

, et al (2005) A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine 80(3): 225–237.

Cao

Baas

Wagner

, et al (2020) Returning scientists and the emergence of China’s science system. Science and Public Policy 47(2): 172–183.

10.

Carayol

Matt

(2006) Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists’ productivity. Information Economics and Policy 18(1): 55–72.

11.

Chauvin

Mulsant

Sockalingam

, et al (2019) Gender differences in research productivity among academic psychiatrists in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 64(6): 415–422.

12.

Choo

Mathis

Harrod

, et al (2020) Contributors to independent research funding success from the perspective of K12 BIRCWH program directors. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 360(5): 596–603.

13.

Christian

Johnstone

Larkins

, et al (2021) A survey of early-career researchers in Australia. eLife 10: e60613.

14.

Cole

(1972) The Ortega hypothesis. Science 178(4059): 368–375.

15.

Dai

Teo

, et al (2021) Understanding Chinese female university teachers’ intention to pursue a PhD degree: Some insights from a Chinese university. Higher Education 81(6): 1347–1366.

16.

Desselle

Andrews

Lui

, et al (2018) The scholarly productivity and work environments of academic pharmacists. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 14(8): 727–735.

17.

Duller

(2022) Regime and sociology: A comparative history of sociology in postwar Europe with qualitative comparative analysis. Social Science History 46(1): 143–172.

18.

Finkelstein

(1984) The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

19.

Fiss

(2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal 54(2): 393–420.

20.

Chan

S-J

Huang

S-M

, et al (2021) Life course productivity model to analyze academic research issues: A longitudinal analysis at one Taiwanese university. Studies in Higher Education 46(11): 2491–2505.

21.

Grimaldi

Diaz

Arboleda

, et al (2019) Data maturity analysis and business performance: A Colombian case study. Heliyon 5(8): e02195.

22.

Grimm

Shapiro

Singhapricha

, et al (2014) Predictors of an academic career on radiology residency applications. Academic Radiology 21(5): 685–690.

23.

Lin

Vogel

, et al (2011) What are the major impact factors on research performance of young doctorate holders in science in China: A USTC survey. Higher Education 62(4): 483–502.

24.

Lehrer

Wang

, et al (2021) Sex differences in academic productivity across academic ranks and specialties in academic medicine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open 4(6): e2112404.

25.

(2010) PhDs: High in number low in quality. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-08/26/content_11203782.htm (accessed 12 December 2021).

26.

Hedjazi

Behravan

(2011) Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher Education 62(5): 635–647.

27.

Horta

Cattaneo

Meoli

(2018) PhD funding as a determinant of PhD and career research performance. Studies in Higher Education 43(3): 542–570.

28.

Horta

Santos

(2016) The impact of publishing during PhD Studies on career research publication, visibility, and collaborations. Research in Higher Education 57(1): 28–50.

29.

Huang

Shen

(2019) What determinants affect doctoral students’ career plans? Main findings from a 2018 survey of Chinese doctoral students. International Journal of Chinese Education 8(2): 99–116.

30.

(2021) Understanding transnational academic migration: U.S. doctorate recipients’ choices of returning to Chinese academe. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance 21(3): 653–669.

31.

Jean

Felbaum

(2019) Impact of training and practice environment on academic productivity of early career academic neurosurgeons. World Neurosurgery 121: e892–e897.

32.

Katranidis

Panagiotidis

Zontanos

(2017) Economists, research performance and national inbreeding: North versus south. Economic Notes 46(1): 145–163.

33.

Khalafallah

Jimenez

Daniels

, et al (2020) Educational program rankings are independently associated with residents’ academic career trajectory in neurological surgery. Journal of Surgical Education 77(5): 1312–1320.

34.

Khoshpouri

Bahar

Khoshpouri

, et al (2021) The beginning of the end. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 155(6): 873–878.

35.

Littell

Corcoran

Pillai

(2008) Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

36.

(2020) Changes in higher education policies: A case study of projects in China. Cambridge Journal of China Studies 15(1): 44–57.

37.

Long

McGinnis

(1981) Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 46(4): 422–442.

38.

Long

Crawford

White

, et al (2009) Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation. Scientometrics 78(2): 231–260.

39.

Luby

Ranganathan

Matusko

, et al (2020) Assessing the key predictors of an academic career after craniofacial surgery fellowship. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 146(6): 759e–767e.

40.

Luís

FAP

(2019) From Classical Regression Analysis to Qualitative Analysis: A Share Price fsQCA Empirical Application. Lisboa: University Institute of Lisbon.

41.

Megel

Langston

Creswell

(1988) Scholarly productivity: A survey of nursing faculty researchers. Journal of Professional Nursing 4(1): 45–54.

42.

Meneses

Moreno

(2019) Factors influencing research productivity of Rizal Technological University: Input to research capability development program. International Journal of Educational Research 7(3): 85–110.

43.

MEOC (2000) National education development statistics bulletin in 1999 (in Chinese). Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/tnull_841.html (accessed 12 December 2021).

44.

MEOC (2013) Notice of Ministry of Education of China on strengthening employment information service for college graduates (in Chinese). Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A15/s3265/201304/t20130417_150998.html (accessed 9 December 2021).

45.

MEOC (2017) National education development statistics bulletin in 2016 (in Chinese). Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/201707/t20170710_309042.html (accessed 12 December 2021).

46.

MEOC (2018) National education development statistics bulletin in 2017 (in Chinese). Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/201807/t20180719_343508.html (accessed 12 December 2021).

47.

MEOC (2019) National education development statistics bulletin in 2018 (in Chinese). Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/201907/t20190724_392041.html (accessed 12 December 2021).

48.

Misangyi

Acharya

(2014) Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal 57(6): 1681–1705.

49.

Nafukho

Wekullo

Muyia

(2019) Examining research productivity of faculty in selected leading public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Development 66: 44–51.

50.

NATURECAREERS (2022) UCAS calling for applications for the NSFC Excellent Young Scientists Fund (Overseas). Available at: https://www.nature.com/naturecareers/job/ucas-calling-for-applications-for-the-nsfc-excellent-young-scientists-fund-overseas-university-of-chinese-academy-of-sciences-ucas-754853 (accessed 4 April 2022).

51.

Nenonen

Storbacka

Sklyar

, et al (2020) Value propositions as market-shaping devices: A qualitative comparative analysis. Industrial Marketing Management 87: 276–290.

52.

Ngaage

Harris

Gao

, et al (2019) Investigating the gender pay gap in industry contributions to academic neurosurgeons. World Neurosurgery 130: 516–522.e1.

53.

NJU (2018) Employment quality report of 2017 graduates of School of Information Management, Nanjing University (in Chinese). Available at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bj3ZkahrJRXTlaFWpCSoCQ (accessed 4 April 2022).

54.

NJU (2020) Employment quality report of 2019 graduates of School of Information Management, Nanjing University (in Chinese). Available at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/xzkf7RvVuyZfy2Q_3TrQPw (accessed 4 April 2022).

55.

NJU (2021) Employment quality report of 2020 graduates of School of Information Management, Nanjing University (in Chinese). Available at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/7_RhJqabLfUJUDhNGDre1g (accessed 4 April 2022).

56.

Nurhudatiana

Anggraeni

(2015) Decision tree modeling for predicting research productivity of university faculty members. In: 2015 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE), Yogyakarta, 25–26 November 2015, pp.70–75. New York, NY: IEEE.

57.

O’Neill

Maddu

Jalal

, et al (2021) Gender disparity in chest radiology in North America. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 50(1): 18–22.

58.

Ogunsola

Odukoya

Banigbe

, et al (2020) A preprogram appraisal of factors influencing research productivity among faculty at college of medicine, University of Lagos. Annals of African Medicine 19(2): 124–130.

59.

Opesade

Famurewa

Igwe

(2017) Gender divergence in academics’ representation and research productivity: A Nigerian case study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 39(3): 341–357.

60.

Pain

(2014) An emerging global picture of early-career scientists. Available at: https://www.science.org/content/article/emerging-global-picture-early-career-scientists (accessed 9 December 2021).

61.

Ragin

(1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

62.

Ragin

(2000) Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

63.

Ragin

(2006a) The limitations of net-effects thinking. In: Rihoux

Grimm

(eds) Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Boston, MA: Springer, pp.13–41.

64.

Ragin

(2006b) Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis 14(3): 291–310.

65.

Ragin

(2008) Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Berkeley, CA: University of Chicago Press.

66.

Ragin

Fiss

(2008) Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In: Ragin

(ed.) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Berkeley, CA: University of Chicago Press, pp.190–212.

67.

Ragin

Strand

(2008) Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal order. Sociological Methods & Research 36(4): 431–441.

68.

Rhaiem

Amara

(2020) Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: Evidence from scholar-level data. Scientometrics 125(1): 53–99.

69.

Rhoads

(2012) The internationalization of faculty life in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 32(3): 351–365.

70.

Rihoux

Ragin

(2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

71.

RUC (2021) The employment report of 2021 graduates of School of Information Resources Management, Renmin University of China (in Chinese). Available at: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/gTPEJbsE2_vFyBARnI8uhg (accessed 4 April 2022).

72.

Sahoo

Singh

Mishra

, et al (2017) Research productivity in management schools of India during 1968-2015: A directional benefit-of-doubt model analysis. Omega 66: 118–139.

73.

Schneider

Wagemann

(2013) Doing justice to logical remainders in QCA: Moving beyond the standard analysis. Political Research Quarterly 66: 211–220.

74.

Schneider

Wagemann

(2012) Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

75.

Schultz

Hess

Sachs

, et al (2020) A structured mentorship elective deepens personal connections and increases scholarly achievements of senior surgery residents. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 231(4): e188–e189.

76.

SEU (2018) “1000 Youth Talents Plan” young scholars recruitment. Available at: https://electronic.seu.edu.cn/dz_en/2018/0323/c11370a210274/pagem.htm (accessed 4 April 2022).

77.

Siddique

Rehman

Khan

, et al (2021) Library and information science research in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis, 1957–2018. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 53(1): 89–102.

78.

SJTU (2022) SOE invites global talents for NSFC Excellent Young Scholars Fund (Overseas). Available at: https://soe.sjtu.edu.cn/En/Show/1252 (accessed 4 April 2022).

79.

Skarmeas

Leonidou

Saridakis

(2014) Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research 67(9): 1796–1805.

80.

Smith

Fox

“Sunny” Park

, et al (2008) Institutional antecedents to research productivity in operations: the US perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 28(1): 7–26.

81.

Swihart

Sundaram

Höök

, et al (2016) Factors affecting scholarly performance by wildlife and fisheries faculty. Journal of Wildlife Management 80(3): 563–572.

82.

Tavares

Sin

Lança

(2019) Inbreeding and research productivity among sociology PhD holders in Portugal. Minerva 57(3): 373–390.

83.

Teodorescu

(2000) Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education 39(2): 201–222.

84.

Tian

Zhang

(2021) Employment discrimination analysis of library and information science based on entity recognition. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 47: 102325.

85.

Useem

Karabel

(1986) Pathways to top corporate management. American Sociological Review 51(2): 184–200.

86.

Verweij

Trell

E-M

(2019) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in spatial planning research and related disciplines: A systematic literature review of applications. Journal of Planning Literature 34(3): 300–317.

87.

WHU (2022) Chuanfu Chen is honored with senior professor of humanities and social sciences at Wuhan University. Available at: https://sim.whu.edu.cn/info/1212/11876.htm (accessed 3 April 2022).

88.

Williamson

Cable

(2003) Predicting early career research productivity: The case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24(1): 25–44.

89.

Woodside

(2013) Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research 66(4): 463–472.

90.

Woolston

O’Meara

(2019) PhD students in China report misery and hope. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03631-z (accessed 4 April 2022).

91.

WSU (2018) Hospitality business management professor receives China’s highest academic honor. Available at: https://news.wsu.edu/news/2018/02/19/hospitality-business-management-professor-receives-chinas-highest-academic-honor/ (accessed 3 April 2022).

92.

WUSTL (2017) Guo named Yangtze River Scholar. Available at: https://global.wustl.edu/guo-named-yangtze-river-scholar/ (accessed April 3, 2022).

93.

Xinhua (2018) China draws up withdrawal mechanism for advanced scholar award. Available at: http://english.www.gov.cn/state_council/ministries/2018/10/04/content_281476330553748.htm (accessed 3 April 2022).

94.

Yuan

Wang

Miao

, et al (2016) The influence of supervisor’s research activity and academic status on PhD students’ research performance (in Chinese). Academic Degrees & Graduate Education (7): 66–71.

95.

Zaed

Menna

Caccavella

, et al (2020) Italian neurosurgical residents’ experience with research activities: A national survey. World Neurosurgery 142: e101–e110.

96.

Zhu

(2019) The composition and evolution of China’s high-level talent programs in higher education. ECNU Review of Education 2(1): 104–110.

97.

ZJU (2012) Wang Chongming honored as the first “senior professor of humanities” in Zhejiang University. Available at: https://rwsk.zju.edu.cn/rwsken/2019/0621/c30509a1264089/page.htm (accessed 3 April 2022).