The objective of this article is to contribute to the theoretical and applied development of the area of Information Literacy, considering prominent changes in the informational environment, such as the culture of participation, constant connectivity, and the emergence of content generated by artificial intelligence. It is an environment that demands information literacy, but also the ability to interact and relate: communication literacy. This article situates infocommunicative literacy theoretically, articulating the three main bases that support this study: Information Literacy, New Media Literacy (NML), and Metaliteracy. From the systematization of these concepts, a conceptual structure accompanied by application propositions is suggested.
BorgesJMarzal García-QuismondoMÁ (2017) Competencias en información y en comunicación: Desarrollo conceptual a partir de la New Media Literacy. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología40(1): 35–43.
4.
BorgesJOliveiraLÍD (2011) Competências infocomunicacionais em ambientes digitais. Observatorio5(4): 291–326.
5.
BorgesJ (2013) Participação política, internet e competências infocomunicacionais: Evidências a partir de organizações da sociedade civil de Salvador. Salvador: Edufba.
CattsRLauJ (2008) Towards Information Literacy Indicators. Paris: UNESCO.
8.
D’AnconaM (2018) Pós-verdade: A nova guerra contra os fatos em tempos de fake news. Barueri: Faro Editorial.
9.
FreireP (2019) Pedagogia do oprimido. São Paulo: Paz & Terra.
10.
JenkinsH (2009) Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
KoltayT (2007) A new direction for library and information science: the communication aspect of information literacy. Information Research12(4): 12–4.
12.
HarariYN (2018) 21 lições para o século 21. Editora Companhia das Letras.
13.
LauJBonillaJGárateA (2018, September) Artificial Intelligence and Labor: Media and Information Competencies Opportunities for Higher Education. In European Conference on Information Literacy (pp. 619–628). Cham: Springer.
14.
LeeLChenDTLiJY, et al. (2015) Understanding new media literacy: The development of a measuring instrument. Computers & Education85: 84–93.
15.
LloydA (2012) Information literacy as a socially enacted practice. Journal of Documentation68(6): 772–783.
16.
MackeyTPJacobsonTE (2011) Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries72(1): 62–78.
17.
MackeyTPJacobsonTE (2014) Metaliteracy: Reinventing Information Literacy to Empower Learners. London: Facet.
18.
MooreCBlackJGlackinB, et al. (2015) Integrating information literacy, the POGIL method, and IPads into a foundational studies program. The Journal of Academic Librarianship41(2): 155–169.
19.
MucchielliA (1998) Les sciences de l’information et de la communication, 2nd edn.Paris: Hachette.
20.
O’BrienKLForteMMackeyTP, et al. (2017) Metaliteracy as pedagogical framework for learner-centered design in three MOOC platforms: connectivist, coursera and canvas. Open Praxis9(3): 267–286.
21.
PariserE (2012) O filtro bolha: o que a internet está escondendo de você. São Paulo: Jorge Zahar Editor.
22.
PerrottiE (2016) Infoeducação: Um passo além científico-profissional. Informação@ Profissões5(2): 5–31.
23.
PilerotO (2016) A practice-based exploration of the enactment of information literacy among PhD students in an interdisciplinary research field. Journal of Documentation72(3): 414–434.
24.
ScolariCA (2016) Transmedia literacy: Informal learning strategies and media skills in the new ecology of communication. Telos193: 13–23.
