Knowledge of students of the exceptions and limitations clause in copyright administration in academic libraries in Ghana

Abstract

Copyright exceptions and limitations, which allow information consumers the right to use copyrighted materials without necessarily obtaining permission from or payment to the rightsholder, promote advances in the arts and sciences. Poor knowledge of copyright laws results in improper use of copyrighted materials. However, the extent to which academic library users in Ghana know about the exceptions and limitations, as well as their understanding of permissible use of information in the Copyright Act 690, 2005 of Ghana are not known. The sequential mixed methods approach was employed to collect data from 530 postgraduate students from two public and two private universities in Ghana to assess their knowledge of copyright exceptions and limitations, as well as their understanding of permissible use of information in Copyright Act 690, 2005 whilst using the services of their libraries. The study shows that students were poorly knowledgeable about the various applications of the exceptions and limitations clause in the copyright laws of Ghana: students were either indifferent (i.e. ‘neutral’), or ‘disagree’, and ‘strongly disagree’ on whether the Copyright Act 690, 2005 had clauses on exceptions and limitations on various uses of information such as for ‘Private copying’, for ‘Quotations’ or ‘For the benefit of persons with disability’. Over 50% of respondents were not sure that the copyright laws of Ghana had provisions for permissible use of information. Age and gender of respondent significantly influenced these responses: older students 46 years and above, and females, were more knowledgeable compared to younger students and males respectively about exceptions and limitations for ‘Private copying’, and ‘For the benefit of people with disability’ in the copyright laws of Ghana. Policymakers in Ghana should therefore adopt youth- and gender-focus strategies in copyright education for efficient administration of copyright laws in academic libraries.

Keywords

Academic libraries Copyright Act 690 2005 copyright exceptions and limitations Ghana persons with disabilities private copying

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adduono

(2015) Rebalancing copyright law, University of Southampton, name of the University school or department. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton.

Adu

van der Walt

(2021a) Effects of awareness of user rights on compliance with copyright laws and policies in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 47: 102359.

Adu

van der Walt

(2021b) Copyright administration in academic libraries in Ghana. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.

Bachman

Schutt

(2016) The Practice of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6th edition. London, UK: SAGE Publications, Inc, pp.189–234.

Berkman Center for Internet and Society and EIFL (2013) Copyright for Librarians: The Essential Handbook. EIFL and Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Utrecht, The Netherlands: EIFL and Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Available at: https://medcontent.metapress.com/index/A65RM03P4874243N.pdf%5Cnhttps://dspace.ndlr.ie/handle/10633/31230 (accessed 8 August 2016).

Cabrera Blázquez

Cappello

Fontaine

, et al. (2017) Exceptions and limitations to copyright, IRIS plus, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/iris-plus-2017-1-exceptions-and-limitations-to-copyright/168078348b (accessed 8 June 2021).

Chapdelaine

(2018) Copyright user rights and remedies: An access to justice perspective. Laws 7: 24.

China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and WIPO (2019) Intellectual Property Basics: A Q&A for Students. Beijing City: China Intellectual Property Administration and WIPO.

Creswell

(2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th edition. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.

10.

Crews

(2008) Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives. In: Standing committee on copyright and related rights seventeenth session, Geneva, 3–7 November 2008, pp.1–434. WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdf (accessed 2 June 2016).

11.

Crews

(2017) Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives: Updated and revised. In: Standing committee on copyright and related rights thirty-fifth session, Geneva, 13–17 November 2017, pp.1–479. WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_35/sccr_35_6.pdf (accessed 8 August 2018).

12.

Di Valentino

(2015) Awareness and perception of copyright among teaching faculty at Canadian Universities. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 10(2): 1–16.

13.

Ferullo

(2004) Major copyright issues in academic libraries. Journal of Library Administration 40(1–2): 23–40.

14.

Finck

Moscon

(2019) Copyright law on blockchains: Between new forms of rights administration and digital rights management 2.0. IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 50: 77–108.

15.

Geiger

Gervais

Senftleben

(2013) The three-step test revisited: How to use the test’s flexibility in national copyright law. PIJIP Research Paper No. 2013-04. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law.

16.

Gervais

(2008) Making copyright whole: A principled approach to copyright exceptions and limitations. University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal 5: 1.

17.

Guibault

(2002) Copyright Limitations and Contracts: An Analysis of the Contractual Overridability of Limitations on Copyright. London: Kluwer Law International, p.27.

18.

Halder

Ray

Chakrabarty

(2010) Gender differences in information seeking behavior in three universities in West Bengal, India. The International Information & Library Review 42(4): 242–251.

19.

Johnson

Onwuegbuzie

Turner

(2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 112–133.

20.

Molina-Azorin

Fetters

(2019) Building a better world through mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 13(3): 275–281.

21.

Morrison

Secker

(2015) Copyright literacy in the UK: A survey of librarians and other cultural heritage sector professionals. Library and Information Research 39(121): 75–97.

22.

Mungai

Dorvlo

Nuwagirya

, et al. (2020) Influence of copyright exceptions and limitations on access to information in Kenya, Ghana and Uganda libraries. Library Management 41(67): 565–577.

23.

Okediji

(2006) The international copyright system: Limitations, exceptions and public interest considerations for developing countries. In: UNCTAD – ICTSD project on IPRs and sustainable development (Issue Paper No. 15), pp.1–52. Available at: https://unctad.org/en/docs/iteipc200610_en.pdf (accessed 3 March 2017).

24.

Onwuegbuzie

Leech

Collins

(2012) Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report 17(28): 1–28.

25.

Samuelson

(2017) Chapter 1: Justifications for copyright limitations and exceptions. In: Okediji Ruth

(ed.) Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp.12–59.

26.

Secker

Morrison

Nilsson

(2019) Copyright literacy and the role of librarians as educators and advocates: An international symposium. Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship 3(2): 1–19.

27.

Senftleben

(2004) Copyright, Limitations and the Three-Step Test: An Analysis of the Three-Step Test in International and EC Copyright Law. Armsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, p.82.

28.

Shrayberg

Volkova

(2021) Features of copyright transformation in the information environment in the age of digitalization. Scientific and Technical Information Processing 48(1): 30–37.

29.

Steinerova

Susol

(2007) Users’ information behavior: A gender perspective. Information Research 12(3): 320.

30.

Stokkmo

(2019) The Role of Collective Licensing. Geneva, Switzerland: International Publishers Association.

31.

Supreme Court of the United States (2021) Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc, no. 18–956, 593. Available at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf (accessed 10 June 2021).

32.

Teddlie

Tashakkori

(2010) Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori

Teddlie

(eds) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc, pp.1–41.

33.

Torres

Xalabarder

(2019) Report on practices and challenges in relation to online distance education and research activities. In: Standing committee on copyright and related rights thirty-ninth session, Geneva, 21–25 October 2019, pp.1–49. WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=456995 (accessed 9 June 2021).

34.

Weatherley

(2014) Copyright education and awareness - A discussion paper. Available at: https://www.mikeweatherley.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/11.pdf (accessed 15 November 2018).

35.

Wikipedia (2014) Limitations and exceptions to copyright. Wikipedia.org. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limitations_and_exceptions_to_copyright (accessed 25 August 2014).

36.

WIPO (2011) The case for a treaty on exceptions and limitations for libraries and archives: Background paper by IFLA, ICA, EIFL and INNOVARTE. Available at: http://wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=189639 (accessed 21 April 2016).

37.

Yin

(2016) Qualitative Research From Start to Finish, 2nd edition. New York: The Guilford Press.