Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite interest in the application of design thinking and methods in librarianship, there seems to be a disconnect between application and education to support it. This study used an online questionnaire to elicit feedback from library workers in the United States about interest in and use of design thinking and methods in library practice, and the need for design skills and abilities in library education. We found that practicing librarians perceive design thinking and methods have relevance to library work, but opinions vary based on library type and nature of the work. Design thinking and methods were used mostly for space planning and program development, with applications emphasizing empathy and user/community understanding aspects—despite myriad other possibilities. Most respondents were in favor of including design thinking and methods in MLIS programs, which can support more robust applications through inclusion of the theoretical, philosophical, and epistemological underpinnings from which design thinking and methods emerge.

Keywords

Design thinking graduate library education librarianship questionnaire surveys United States

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell

(2011) Design thinking for better libraries. Information Outlook 15(6): 10–11.

Bell

(2008) Design thinking. American Libraries 39(1/2): 44–49.

Bell

Shank

(2007) Academic Librarianship by Design: A Blended Librarian’s Guide to the Tools and Techniques. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

Bertot

Sarin

Percell

(2015) Re-envisioning the MLS: Findings, issues and considerations. Report, College of Information Studies, University of Maryland College Park. Available at: http://mls.umd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ReEnvisioningFinalReport.pdf (accessed 7 May 2019).

Bradigan

Rodman

(2008) Single service point: It’s all in the design. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 27(4): 367–378.

Brown

Katz

(2009) Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: Harper Business.

Brown

Wyatt

(2010) Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Available at: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation (accessed 7 May 2019).

Carter

(1999) Introduction: What makes a ‘field’ a field. Virginia Journal of Sports & the Law 235: GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-128; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2013-128. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2351495 (accessed 7 May 2019).

Charles

(2012) Is Dewey dead? Public Libraries Online, 18 December 2012. Available at: http://publiclibrariesonline.org/2012/12/is-dewey-dead/ (accessed 17 April 2019).

10.

Clarke

(2016) It’s not rocket library science: Design epistemology and American librarianship. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington Information School, Seattle, USA.

11.

Clarke

(2018a) How we done it good: Research through design as a legitimate methodology for librarianship. Library and Information Science Research 40(4): 255–261.

12.

Clarke

(2018b) Toward a design epistemology for librarianship. Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 88(1): 401–405.

13.

Clarke

(2019) Design Thinking. Library Futures Series, Book 4. Chicago, IL: American Library Association/Neal-Schuman.

14.

Clarke

Kim

(2018) The more things change the more they stay the same: Educational and disciplinary backgrounds of American librarians, 1950–2015. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 59(4): 179–205.

15.

Clarke

Potter

(2019) Exploring design coursework in graduate library education: iSchools vs. non-iSchools. In: Proceedings of the iConference, College Park, MD, 31 March–3 April 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21900/iconf.2019.103297 (accessed 19 August 2019).

16.

Clarke

Lee

Mayer

(2017) Design topics in graduate library education: A preliminary investigation. In: Association for Library and Information Science Education Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 17–20 January 2017, Poster session.

17.

Cross

(2011) Design Thinking. Oxford: Berg.

18.

Garmer

(2016) Libraries in the exponential age: Moving from the edge of innovation to the center of community. Report for the Aspen Institute, Washington DC. Available at: http://csreports.aspeninstitute.org/documents/Libraries_Exponential_Age.pdf (accessed 7 May 2019).

19.

Guterman

(2009) How to become a better manager . . . By thinking like a designer. MIT Sloan Management Review 50(4): 39–42.

20.

Hosseini-Ara

(2012) C3: Customer-centered classification. In: 27th Annual computers in libraries conference, Washington, DC, USA, 22 March 2012. Available at: http://www.infotoday.com/cil2012/session.asp?ID=B201 (accessed 7 May 2019).

21.

Ippoliti

(2016) Research as design, design as research: Applying design thinking to data management needs assessment. In: 2016 Library assessment conference (eds Baughman

, et al.), Washington DC, USA, 31 October–2 November 2016. Available at: http://old.libraryassessment.org/bm~doc/4-ippoliti-2016.pdf (accessed 7 May 2019).

22.

Lawson

(1990) How Designers Think. 2nd edn. London: Butterworth Architecture.

23.

Lawson

(1994) Design in Mind. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

24.

Leavy

(2010) Design thinking: A new mental model of value innovation. Strategy & Leadership 38(3): 5–14.

25.

Leavy

(2012) Collaborative innovation as the new imperative: Design thinking, value co-creation and the power of ‘pull’. Strategy & Leadership 40(2): 25–34.

26.

Luca

Narayan

(2016) Signage by design: A design-thinking approach to library user experience. Weave: Journal of Library User Experience 1(5). DOI: 10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.501.

27.

Lynch

Mulero

(2007) Dewey? At this library with a very different outlook, they don’t. New York Times, 14 July 2007. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/14/us/14dewey.html (accessed 7 May 2019).

28.

Markham Public Library (n.d.) C3 customer-centered classification at Markham Public Library. Available at: http://c3mpl.blogspot.com/ (accessed 10 January 2019).

29.

Marquez

Downey

(2015a) Service design: An introduction to a holistic assessment methodology of library services. Weave: Journal of Library User Experience 1(2). DOI: 10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.201.

30.

Marquez

Downey

(2015b) Service design: Toward a holistic assessment of the library. PNLA Quarterly 80(1). Available at: https://arc.lib.montana.edu/ojs/index.php/pnla/article/view/293.

31.

Marquez

Downey

(2016) Library Service Design: A LITA Guide to Holistic Assessment, Insight, and Improvement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

32.

Martin

(2009) The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

33.

Norton

Dowdall

(2016) Strengthening networks, sparking change: Museums and libraries as community catalysts. Report for the Institute of Museum and Library Services. Available at: https://www.imls.gov/sites/default/files/publications/documents/community-catalyst-report-january-2017.pdf (accessed 7 May 2019).

34.

Polaine

Lv̜lie

(2013) Service Design: From Insight to Implementation. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.

35.

Schwartz

(2013) First year in the second city: Brian Bannon’s first year at the helm of the Chicago Public Library. Library Journal 138(11): 42.

36.

Sharma

Walker

Dolmer

, et al. (2009) C3: Replacing Dewey for better merchandising and customer service. In: Ontario Library Association conference 2009, Ontario, Canada, 29 January 2009. Available at: http://accessola2.com/superconference2009/thu/316/mpl.pdf (accessed 7 May 2019).

37.

Shore

(2007) Arizona library shuns Dewey system (interview by Ydstie

). National Public Radio, 16 June 2007. Available at: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11131877 (accessed 7 May 2019).

38.

Simon

(1969) The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

39.

Simon

(1996) The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.

40.

Stickdorn

Schneider

(2011) This is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

41.

Subramaniam

Waugh

Clegg

(2018) Co-designing the next generation of education for children and youth librarians: A research-practice partnership. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ALISE annual conference (eds Wang

Green

Assefa

), Denver, CO, USA, 6–9 February 2018, pp. 25–30. Available at: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/99018 (accessed 7 May 2019).

42.

Whang

Tawatao

Danneker

, et al. (2017) Understanding the transfer student experience using design thinking. Reference Services Review 45(2): 298-313.

43.

Zomerdijk

Voss

(2010) Service design for experience-centric services. Journal of Service Research 13(1): 68–82.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.35 MB

Design thinking and methods in library practice and graduate library education

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material