The paper investigates the supporting role of information professionals in interdisciplinary digital research projects. It identifies three encounter scenarios in which information professionals meet domain researchers (as research librarian, as information specialist, and as iHumanist) and links them to the domain researchers ‘modes of orientation’. We examine these theoretical distinctions by discussing three cases from our own practical engagement in the Prior project. Our discussion shows that the scenarios help to understand information professionals’ supporting work, explain the conflicts that emerge, and explicate information professionals’ shifting conceptions of what they are doing in terms of the shifting encounter scenarios. In short, the paper presents methodological and theoretical insights that can be useful in understanding encounters between information professionals and domain researchers.
AdhiantoLBanerjeeSFaganM, et al. (2010) HPCTOOLKIT: Tools for performance analysis of optimized parallel programs. Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience22(6): 685–701.
2.
AnkenyRALeonelliS (2016) Repertoires : A post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science60: 18–28.
3.
Baeza-YatesRRibeiro-NetoB (2011) Modern Information Retrieval: The Concepts and Technology Behind Search. 2nd edn.New York: Addison Wesley.
4.
BarrionuevoL (2011) Libraries for Users: Services in Academic Libraries. Oxford: Chandos.
5.
BatleyS (2005) Classification in Theory and Practice. Oxford: Chandos.
6.
BawdenD (2004) Understanding documents and documentation. Journal of Documentation60(3): 243–244.
7.
BawdenDRobinsonL (2012) An Introduction to Information Science. London: Facet.
8.
BlairDC (1992) Information retrieval and the philosophy of language. Computer Journal35(3): 200–207.
9.
BlairDCKimbroughSO (2002) Exemplary documents: A foundation for information retrieval design. Information Processing & Management38(3): 363–379.
10.
BorgmanCL (2007) Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
BosNZimmermanAOlsonJS, et al. (2007) From shared databases to communities of practice: A taxonomy of collaboratories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(1): 653–672.
12.
BrackenFEarlsDMaddersC, et al. (2014) The potential use of online tools for scientific collaboration by biology researchers. Aslib Journal of Information Management66(1): 13–37.
CaseDO (2012) Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior. 3rd edn.Bingley: Emerald.
19.
ChowdhuryGG (2010) Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. 3rd edn.London: Facet.
20.
ChristensenLR (2016) On intertext in chemotherapy: An ethnography of text in medical practice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)25(1): 1–38.
21.
CummingsJNKieslerS (2008) Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. In: OlsonGMZimmermanABosN (eds) Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, pp. 99–117.
22.
DirksenVHuizingASmitB (2012) ‘Piling on layers of understanding’: The use of connective ethnography for the study of (online) work practices. In: HughesJ (ed.) SAGE Internet Research Methods. London: SAGE, pp. v4–255-v4–275.
23.
ElsayedIMadeyGBrezanyP (2011) Portals for collaborative research communities: Two distinguished case studies. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience23(3): 269–278.
24.
EngererVAlbretsenJ (2017) The Prior Internet Resources 2017: Information systems and development perspectives. In: HaslePFVBlackburnPØhrstrømP (eds) Logic and Philosophy of Time: Themes from Prior. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press, pp. 223–249.
25.
EngererVRoued-CunliffeHAlbretsenJ, et al. (2017) The Prior project: From archive boxes to a research community. In: DHN 2017 Digital humaniora i Norden/ Digital humanities in the Nordic countries, Göteborg, Sweden, 14–16 March 2017, pp. 53–57. Available at: http://www.forskningsdatabasen.dk/en/catalog/2352383584 (accessed 26 August 2018).
26.
EttorreMPontieriLRuffoloM, et al. (2003) A prototypal environment for collaborative work within a research organization. In: 14th International workshop on database and expert systems applications (DEXA’03), Prague, Czech Republic, 1–5 September 2003, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/DEXA.2003.1232035. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1232035&isnumber=27592 (accessed 27 August 2018).
27.
FalconerL (2006) Organizational learning, tacit information, and e-learning: A review. Learning Organization13(2): 140–151.
28.
FerrandezA (2011) Lexical and syntactic knowledge for information retrieval. Information Processing and Management47(5): 692–705.
29.
FinholtTA (2002) Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology36(1): 73–107.
30.
FoxR (2012) Navigators for the digital ocean. OCLC Systems & Services28(2): 67–74.
31.
FrohmannB (2009) Revisiting ‘what is a document?’Journal of Documentation65(2): 291–303.
32.
GoodwinP (2012a) Information literacy and Library 2.0: An update. In: GoodwinPParkerJ (eds) Information Literacy Beyond Library 2.0. 2nd edn.London: Facet, pp. 19–26.
33.
GoodwinP (2012b) Library 2.0: A retrospective. In: GoodwinPParkerJ (eds) Information Literacy Beyond Library 2.0. 2nd edn.London: Facet, pp. 3–18.
34.
GrassianESKaplowitzJR (2009) Information Literacy Instruction: Theory and Practice. 2nd edn. Information Literacy Sourcebooks. New York: Neal-Schuman.
35.
HayatTLyonsK (2017) A typology of collaborative research networks. Online Information Review41(2): 155–170.
36.
HiderP (2012) Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata. London: Facet.
37.
HjørlandB (1998) Information retrieval, text composition, and semantics. Knowledge Organization25(1/2): 16–31.
38.
HjørlandB (2002) Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches – traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation58(4): 422–462.
39.
HockeyS (2012) Digital humanities in the age of the Internet: Reaching out to other communities. In: DeeganMMcCartyW (eds) Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 81–92.
40.
JacsoP (2004) Natural language searching. Online Information Review28(1): 75–79.
41.
JefferyDWustemanJ (2012) OJAX++: Demonstrating the next generation of virtual research environments. The Electronic Library30(1): 134–145.
KingBEReinoldK (2008) Finding the Concept, not just the Word: A Librarian’s Guide to Ontologies and Semantics. Oxford: Chandos.
44.
KolbDA (1984) Experiential Learning : Experience as the Source of Learning and. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
45.
KondratovaIGoldfarbI (2003) Design concepts for virtual research and collaborative environments. In: 10th ISPE international conference on concurrent engineering: The vision for future generations in research and applications (eds ChalJ, et al.), Lisse, Portugal, pp. 797–803. The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
46.
KrügerFBaderSHeinA, et al. (2017) A virtual research environment to support remote behaviour monitoring from data collection to analysis. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW), New Orleans, LA, USA, 18–21 November 2017, pp. 711–718. DOI: 10.1109/ICDMW.2017.99. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8215731&isnumber=8215629 (accessed 27 August 2018).
47.
KuhnTS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
LancasterFW (2003) Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. 3rd edn.London: Facet.
49.
LarsonRR (2010) Information retrieval systems. In: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 2553–2563.
50.
LaveJ (2011) Apprenticeship in Critical Ethnographic Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
LevyPRobertsS (2005) Developing the New Learning Environment: The Changing Role of the Academic Librarian. London: Facet.
52.
LiL (2009) Emerging Technologies for Academic Libraries in the Digital Age. Chandos Information Professional Series. Oxford: Chandos.
LittlejohnA (2005) Key issues in the design and delivery of technology-enhanced learning. In: LevyPRobertsS (eds) Developing the New Learning Environment: The Changing Role of the Academic Librarian. London: Facet, pp. 70–90.
55.
LloydATaljaS (2010) Practising Information Literacy: Bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy Together. Wagga Wagga, NSW: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
56.
LossauN (2011) Virtuelle Umgebungen. Virtuelle Forschungs-umgebungen und die Rolle von Bibliotheken58(3/4): 154–163.
57.
LundNW (2009) Document theory. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology43(1): 1–55.
58.
MartinKQuan-haaseA (2016) The role of agency in historians’ experiences of serendipity in physical and digital information environments. Journal of Documentation72(6): 1108–1026.
59.
MartonFBoothS (1997) Learning and Awareness. New York, London: Routledge.
60.
MoredaPLlorensHSaqueteE, et al. (2011) Combining semantic information in question answering systems. Information Processing and Management47(6): 870–885.
61.
NicoliniD (2013) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
NonakaIToyamaRKonnoN (2000) SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation.(socialization, externalization, combination, internalization)(Statistical data included). Long Range Planning33(1): 5–34.
ØsterlundCSnyderJSawyerS, et al. (2015) Documenting work: From participant observation to participant tracing. In: ElsbachKDKramerRM (eds) Handbook of Innovative Qualitative Research. New York, London: Routledge, pp. 391–400.
65.
Owusu-AnsahEK (2005) Debating definitions of information literacy: Enough is enough!Library Review54(6): 366–374.
66.
PartridgeHEdwardsSLThorpeC (2014) Evidence-based practice: Information professionals’ experience of information literacy in the workplace. In: LloydATaljaS (eds) Practising Information Literacy Bringing Theories of Learning, Practice and Information Literacy Together. London: Chandos, pp. 273–297.
67.
PeacockJ (2005) Information literacy education in practice. In: LevyPRobertsS (eds) Developing the New Learning Environment: The Changing Role of the Academic Librarian. London: Facet, pp. 153–180.
68.
PickardAJ (2013) Research Methods in Information. 2nd edn.London: Facet.
69.
Prior Project Group (2017) The Primacy of Tense: A.N. Prior Now and Then (Project website). Available at: http://www.prior.aau.dk/ (accessed 26 August 2018).
70.
RishelTPerkinsLAYenduriS, et al. (2007) Determining the context of text using augmented latent semantic indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(14): 2197–2204.
71.
RobinsonLSchulzJ (2012) New avenues for sociological inquiry: Evolving forms of ethnographic practice. In: HughesJ (ed.) SAGE Internet Research Methods. London: SAGE, pp. v4–33-v4–47.
72.
RodiekJ (2010) Environment building at home. Landscape and Urban Planning148(April): 132–138.
73.
RollandBPotterJD (2017) On the facilitation of collaborative research : Enter stage left, the consortium director. Cancer, Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention26(11): 1581–1582.
74.
RuthvenIKellyD (2011) Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval. London: Facet.
75.
SchatzkiTR (2001) Introduction: Practice theory. In: SchatzkiTRKnorr-CetinaKKvon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 10–23.
76.
ShuhuaiRXingjunSHaiqingL, et al. (2009) From information commons to knowledge commons: Building a collaborative knowledge sharing environment for innovative communities. The Electronic Library27(2): 247–257.
77.
Sparck JonesKKayM (1973) Linguistics and Information Science. New York, London: Academic Press.
78.
StahlG (2006) Group Cognition, Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79.
StockWGStockM (2013a) Handbook of Information Science. Berlin: deGruyter Saur.
80.
StockWGStockM (2013b) Information literacy. In: StockWGStockM (eds) Handbook of Information Science. Berlin: deGruyter Saur, pp. 78–87.
81.
StuartD (2015) Practical Ontologies for Information Professionals. London: Facet.
82.
SundinO (2005) Conflicting approaches to user information seeking education in Scandinavian Web-based tutorials. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology42(1). DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450420186.
83.
SundinO (2008) Negotiations on information-seeking expertise: A study of web-based tutorials for information literacy. Journal of Documentation64(1): 24–44.
84.
SvenoniusE (2000) The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85.
TompkinsPPerrySLippincottJK (1998) New learning communities: Collaboration, networking, and information literacy. Information Technology and Libraries17(2): 100–106.
86.
TredinnickL (2007) Digital Information Culture: The Individual and Society in the Digital Age. Oxford: Chandos.
87.
UrquhartC (ed.) (2018) Information Systems, Process and Practice. London: Facet.
88.
VeermanAVeldhuis-DiermanseE (2006) Collaborative learning through electronic knowledge construction in academic eduacation. In: O’DonnellAMHmelo-SilverCEErkensG (eds) Collaborative Learning, Reasoning and Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 323–354.
89.
WallacePM (2015) Introduction to Information Systems. 2nd edn.Boston, MA: Pearson.
90.
WangS (2001) Text types and varying degrees of interpretative constraint. Document Design2(1): 34–57.
91.
WarnerJ (2007) Linguistics and information theory: Analytic advantages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(2): 275–285.
92.
WengerE (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93.
ZhouGZhangM (2007) Extracting relation information from text documents by exploring various types of knowledge. Information Processing & Management43(4): 969–982.
