In the wake of the panic over fake news that followed the 2016 US presidential election, librarians and other information professionals are being urged to “take leadership in the current crisis” (Jacobson, 2017: 24). The response from the profession has been to reaffirm the core values of librarianship and to hold up traditional services as a means for combating misinformation. The problem is that these solutions are offered in the absence of a full understanding of the real danger of misinformation, which is “not just [that] misinformation is ‘out there,’” but “what misinformation does to our mind” (Ecker, 2015: 22). Misinformation research in other fields directly challenges the solutions proposed by library professionals and casts doubts on their underlying assumptions. This article provides an overview of the library and information science approach to misinformation in the United States, discusses the shortcomings of that approach, and points to possible next steps for remedying the problem.
BarclayDA (2017) The role of academic libraries in an era of fake news, alternative facts, and information overload. Presentation at the Spring 2017 Coalition for Networked Information meeting, 3–4 AprilAlbuquerque, New Mexico, USA. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClFBqk3Dvek (accessed 2 June 2017).
BerryJN (2016) The misinformation age. Library Journal141(14): 10.
11.
BossallerJS (2014) Evidence, not authority: Reconsidering presentation of science for difficult decisions. Reference & User Services Quarterly53(3): 232–241.
12.
BuschmanJ (2017) November 8 2016: Core values, bad faith, and democracy. Library Quarterly87(3): 277–286.
13.
CalvertPJ (1998) Web-based misinformation in the context of higher education. Asian Libraries8(3): 83–91.
14.
CalvertPJ (2001) Scholarly misconduct and misinformation on the World Wide Web. Electronic Library19(4): 232–240.
15.
CannDRKatzAN (2005) Habitual acceptance of misinformation: Examination of individual differences and source attributions. Memory and Cognition33(3): 405–417.
ChenXSinS-CJThengY-L, et al. (2015) Why students share misinformation on social media: Motivation, gender, and study-level differences. Journal of Academic Librarianship41(5): 583–592.
18.
ChenYConroyNJRubinVL (2015) News in an online world: The need for an ‘automatic’ crap detector. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology52(1): 1–4.
19.
ClifasefiSLGarryMMLoftusE (2007) Setting the record (or video camera) straight on memory: The video camera model of memory and other memory myths. In: Della SalaS (ed.) Tall Tales about the Mind and Brain: Separating Fact from Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 60–75.
20.
CookeNA (2017) Posttruth, truthiness, and alternative facts: Information behavior and critical information consumption for a new age. Library Quarterly87(3): 211–221.
DrobnickiJAAsaroR (2001) Historical fabrications on the Internet: Recognition, evaluation, and use in bibliographic instruction. The Reference Librarian35(74): 121–164.
24.
EckerUKH (2015) The psychology of misinformation. Australasian Science36(2): 21–23.
25.
EckerUKHLewandowskySFentonO, et al. (2014) Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation. Memory and Cognition42: 292–304.
26.
EhrenbergR (2012) Social media sway: Worries over political misinformation on Twitter attract scientists’ attention. Science News182(8): 22–25.
27.
FallisD (2015) What is disinformation?Library Trends63(3): 401–426.
28.
FitzgeraldMA (1997) Misinformation on the Internet: Applying evaluation skills to online information. Emergency Librarian24(3): 9–14.
29.
FloridiL (1996) Brave.Net.World: The Internet as a disinformation superhighway?Electronic Library14(5): 509–514.
30.
FlynnDJNyhanBReiflerJ (2017) The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Advances in Political Psychology38(1): 127–150.
31.
GravesL (2016) Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact checking. Communication, Culture and Critique10(3): 518–537.
32.
Harvard Library (2017) Fake News, Misinformation, and Propaganda. Last updated March28. Available at: http://guides.library.harvard.edu/fake (accessed 18 September 2017).
33.
HernonP (1995) Disinformation and misinformation through the Internet: Findings of an exploratory study. Government Information Quarterly12(2): 133–139.
JacobsonL (2017) The smell test: In the era of fake news, librarians are our best hope. School Library Journal63(1): 24–29.
37.
JainSSharmaVKaushalR (2016) Towards automated real-time detection of misinformation on Twitter. In: 2016 International conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics (ICACCI), Jaipur, India, 21–24September. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICACCI.2016.7732347.
38.
JinFWangWZhaoL, et al. (2014) Misinformation propagation in the age of Twitter. Computer47(12): 90–94.
39.
KahanDMJenkins-SmithHBramanD (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research14(2): 147–174.
40.
KahneJBowyerB (2017) Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal54(1): 3–34.
LenkerM (2016) Motivated reasoning, political information, and information literacy education. portal: Libraries and the Academy16(3): 511–528.
45.
LevineP (2005) The problem of online misinformation and the role of schools. Studies in Media & Information Literacy5(1): 1–11.
46.
LewandowskySEckerUKHSeifertCM, et al. (2012) Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest13(3): 106–131.
47.
MoreheadJ (1988) Consequences of federal government information policies, 1981–1986. In: IrvingRDKatzB (eds) Reference Services and Public Policy. New York: Haworth Press, pp. 7–33.
48.
MorewedgeCKYoonHScopellitiI, et al. (2015) Debiasing decisions: Improved decision making with a single training intervention. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences2(1): 129–140.
49.
NyhanBReiflerJ (2010) When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior32(2): 303–330.
50.
NyhanBReiflerJ (2012) Misinformation and Fact-Checking: Research Findings from Social Science. Media Policy Initiative Research Paper. Washington, DC: New American Foundation. Available at: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/Misinformation_and_Fact-checking.pdf (accessed 25 June 2017).
51.
QazvinianVRosengrenERadevDR, et al. (2011) Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In: 2011 Conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Edinburgh, Scotland, July27–31 July, pp. 1589–1599. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
52.
RappDN (2016) The consequences of reading inaccurate information. Current Directions in Psychological Science25(4): 281–285.
53.
RedlawskDPCivettiniAJWEmmersonKM (2010) The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever ‘get it’?Political Psychology31(4): 563–593.
54.
SafieddineFMasriWPourghomiP (2016) Corporate responsibility in combating online misinformation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications7(2): 126–132.
SwireBBerinskyAJLewandowskyS, et al. (2017) Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science4(160802). DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160802.
TaberCSCannDKucsovaS (2009) The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior31: 137–155.
63.
TambuscioMRuffoGFlamminiA, et al. (2015) Fact-checking effect on viral hoaxes: A model of misinformation spread in social networks. In: 24th International conference on World Wide Web, Florence, Italy, 18–22 May, Geneva: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. pp. 977–982.
64.
ThorsonE (2016) Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communications33: 460–480.
65.
UscinskiJE (2015) The epistemology of fact checking (is still naive): Rejoinder to Amazeen. Critical Review27(2):243–252.
66.
UscinskiJEButlerRW (2013) The epistemology of fact checking. Critical Review25(2): 162–180.
67.
VedderA (2001) Misinformation through the Internet: Epistemology and ethics. In: VedderA (ed.) Ethics and the Internet. Antwerp: Intersentia, pp. 125–132.
68.
VedderA (2005) Expert knowledge for non-experts: Inherent and contextual risks of misinformation. Information Communication and Ethics in Society3: 113–119.
WalshJ (2010) Librarians and controlling disinformation: Is multi-literacy instruction the answer?Library Review59(7): 498–511.
72.
WiegandWA (1999) Tunnel vision and blind spots: What the past tells us about the present; reflections on the twentieth-century history of American librarianship. Library Quarterly69(1): 1–32.
