Knowledge of use and type of references in Library and Information Science and Legal Medicine as support for specialized librarians

Abstract

Librarians of specialized institutions need to have solid knowledge of the scientific environment (impact of publications, use of citations and scientific references, etc.) related to the group for which they work in order to properly manage the collection of their libraries. The present research analyses the evolution of the use and types of references cited by academics in Library and Information Science and in Legal Medicine as an aid for specialist librarians in this sense. The study has a dual aspect: one is to determine how the behaviour of references, especially Web references, in relation to accessibility and use has evolved over 15 years in alternating periods (1999, 2004, 2009, 2013) in these two areas, and the other is to determine from the type of references scientists of prestige use in their publications whether they consider the Internet to be a reliable source of information for their research. Two journals with high impact factors according to Journal Citation Reports were selected from each category: Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology (JASIST) and Information Processing & Management (IP&M) corresponding to Information Science, and Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology (RT&P) and Forensic Science International (FSI) corresponding to Legal Medicine. The results showed greater accessibility and use of Web references in the Information Science community, but also considerable progress in these aspects in recent years in Legal Medicine.

Keywords

Accessibility Library and Information Science Legal Medicine librarians use Web references

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bhat

SVR

Sampath Kumar

(2008) Web citation behaviour in scholarly electronic journals in the field of Library and Information Science. Webology 5(2).

Consejo de Cooperación Bibliotecaria Grupo de Trabajo sobre Perfiles Profesionales (2013) Perfiles profesionales del Sistema Bibliotecario Español: fichas de caracterización. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. Subdirección General de Documentación y Publicaciones. Available at: http://travesia.mcu.es/portalnb/jspui/bitstream/10421/6841/1/perfilesprofesionalesSBE.pdf (accessed 14 April 2016).

Dimitrova

Bugeja

(2007) Raising the dead: Recovery of decayed online citations. American Communication Journal 9(2). Available at: http://ac-journal.org/journal/2007/Summer/2RaisingtheDead.pdf (accessed 7 May 2016).

Estivill

Urbano

(1997) Como citar recursos electrónicos. Available at: http://www.ub.edu/biblio/citae-e.htm (accessed 10 June 2016).

Garfield

(1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178: 471–479.

Germain

(2000) URLs: Uniform resource locators or unreliable resource locators, College & Research Libraries 61(4): 359–365.

Gul

Mahajan

Ali

(2017) The growth and decay of URLs citation: A case of an online Library & Information Science journal. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 19(3). Available at: http://majlis.fsktm.um.edu.my/document.aspx?FileName=1502.pdf (accessed 7 June 2017).

Haycock

(2004) Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development. Library Resources & Technical Services 48(2): 102–106.

Hester

Heilig

Drake

et al. (2004) Internet citations in oncology journals: A vanishing resource? JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 96(12): 969–971.

10.

Koehler

(1999a) An analysis of Web page and Web site constancy and permanence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(2): 162–180.

11.

Koehler

(1999b) Digital libraries and World Wide Web sites and page persistence. Information Research 4(4): 1–12.

12.

Koehler

(2004) A longitudinal study of Web pages continued: A report after six years. Information Research 9(2). Available at: http://www.informationr.net/ir/9–2/paper174.html (accessed 24 July 2015).

13.

Kohn

Gordon

(2014) Citation analysis as a tool for collection development and instruction. Collection Management 39(4): 275–296.

14.

Lawrence

Coetzee

Glover

et al. (2001) Persistence of web references in scientific research. IEEE Computer (34)2: 26–31.

15.

MacRoberts

Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(5): 342–349.

16.

Maharana

Nayak

Sahu

(2006) Scholarly use of Web resources in LIS research: A citation analysis. Library Review 55(9): 598–607.

17.

Moghaddam

Saberi

Esmaeel

(2012) Availability and half-life of web references cited in Information Research Journal: A citation study. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM) 8(2): 57–75.

18.

Nisonger

(2004) Autobiography: An investigation of ISI database coverage in determining author citedness. College & Research Libraries 65(March): 152–163.

19.

Pinfield

(2001) The changing role of subject librarians in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 33(1): 32–38.

20.

Prithvi Raj

Sampath Kumar

(2013) URLs as references in Indian LIS conference papers: An analysis. Annals of Library and Information Studies 60: 284–295.

21.

Rochon

et al. (2015) Prospective evaluation of the accessibility of Internet references in leading general medical journals. Scientometrics 102(2): 1375–1384.

22.

Rumsey

(2002) Runaway train: Problems of permanence, accessibility, and stability in the use of web sources in law review citations. Law Library Journal 94(1): 27–39.

23.

Sampath Kumar

Prithvi Raj

(2012) Availability and persistence of web citations in Indian LIS literature. The Electronic Library 30(1): 19–32.

24.

Sampath Kumar

Vinay Kumar

(2013) HTTP 404-page (not) found: Recovery of decayed URL citations. Journal of Informetrics 7(1): 145–157.

25.

Shiri

(1998) Cybermetrics: A New Horizon in Information Research. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/19654630/Cybermetrics_a_new_horizon_in_information_research (accessed 25 February 2014).

26.

Spinellis

(2003) The decay and failures of Web references. Available at: http://www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/pubs/jrnl/2003-CACM-URLcite/html/urlcite.html (accessed 23 April 2016).

27.

Tajeddini

Azimi

Sadatmoosavi

et al. (2011) Death of web citations: A serious alarm for authors. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 16(3): 17–29.

28.

Urbano-Salido

(2001) El análisis de citas en trabajos de investigadores como método para el estudio del uso de información en bibliotecas. Anales de Documentación 4: 243–266.

29.

Vasileiou

Rowley

Hartley

(2012) Perspectives on the future of e-books in libraries in universities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 44(4): 217–226.

30.

Veronin

(2002) Where are they now? A case study of health-related web site attrition. Journal of Medical Internet Research (4)2. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2002/2/e10/ (accessed 7 May 2016).

31.

Wren

(2004) 404 not found: The stability and persistence of URLs published in MEDLINE. Bioinformatics 20(5): 668–672.

32.

Wren

(2008) URL decay in MEDLINE: A 4-year follow-up study. Bioinformatics 24(11): 1381–1385.

33.

Wren

Johnson

Crockett

et al. (2006) Uniform resource locator decay in dermatology journals: Author attitudes and preservation practices. Archives of Dermatology 142(9): 1147–1152.

34.

(2009) An empirical study of the accessibility of web references in two Chinese academic journals. Scientometrics 78(3): 481–503.

35.

Youngen

(1997) Citation patterns of the physics preprint literature with special emphasis on the preprints available electronically. Available at: http://www.stsci.edu/stsci/meetings/lisa3/youngeng.html (accessed 20 April 2016).

36.

Zhao

Logan

(2002) Citation analysis using scientific publications on the Web as data source: A case study in the XML research area. Scientometrics 54(3): 449–472.