Assessment and measurement of performance in academic libraries are well established. However, in developing countries such as Brazil, this has not been fully explored. This study aims to contribute to the knowledge by investigating practices of measuring library performance in Brazilian public academic libraries and analyzing their relationship with managerial processes. It employs a survey method with a descriptive-explanatory objective and follows a quantitative research approach. Data was gathered from 149 libraries. Results indicate that performance measurement system at academic libraries in Brazil lack systematic methods. However, libraries with implemented performance management systems have better management practices, reflecting in their library management maturity.
Al HijjiKCoxA (2012) Performance measurement methods at academic libraries in Oman. Performance Measurement and Metrics13(3): 183–196.
2.
BititciUS (2015) Managing Business Performance: The Science and the Art. Chichester: Wiley.
3.
BititciUSCarrieASMcDevittL (1997) Integrated performance measurement systems: The development guide. International Journal of Operations and Production Management17(5): 522–534.
4.
BititciUSet al. (2010) Managerial process: An operations management perspective towards dynamic capabilities. Production Planning & Control22(2):157–173.
5.
BititciUSet al. (2011) Managerial processes: Business process that sustain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management31(8): 851–891.
6.
BourneMKennerleyMFranco-SantosM (2005) Managing through measures: A study of impact on performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management16(4): 373–395.
7.
BowlbyR (2011) Living the future: Organizational performance assessmentJournal of Library Administration51(7–8): 618–644.
8.
BrophyP (2006) Measuring Library Performance: Principles and techniques. London: Facet.
9.
ChoongK (2013) Understanding the features of performance measurement system: A literature review. Measuring Business Excellence17(4): 102–121.
10.
ChoongK (2014) Has this large of measurement publications performance contributed to its better understanding? The systematic review for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research52 (14): 4174–4197.
11.
delaManoMCreaserC (2016) The impact of the Balanced Scorecard in libraries: From performance measurement to strategic management. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science48(2): 191–208.
12.
DennisMGreenwoodJWatsonA (2013) LibQUAL revisited: Further analysis of qualitative and quantitative survey results at the University of Mississippi. Journal of Academic Librarianship39(6): 512–516.
13.
FolanPBrowneJ (2005) A review of measurement performance: Towards performance management. Computers in Industry56(7): 663–680.
14.
ForzaC (2002) Survey research in operations management: A process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management22(2): 152–194.
15.
ForzaCSalvadorF (2000) Assessing some distinctive dimensions of performance feedback information in high performing plants, International Journal of Operations and Production Management20(3): 359–385.
16.
Franco-SantosMet al. (2007) Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management27(8): 784–801.
17.
GangaGMD (2012) Trabalho de Conclusão de curso na Engenharia de Produção: um guia prático de conteúdo e forma. São Paulo: Atlas.
18.
GoodallD (1988) Performance measurement: A historical perspective. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science20(2): 128–144.
19.
GriffithsJRJohnsonFHartleyRJ (2007) User satisfaction as a measure of system performance. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science39(3): 142–152.
20.
HairJRet al. (2005) Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
21.
HarmonP (2010) The scope and evolution of business process management. In: BrockeJRosemannM (eds) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. New York: Springer, pp. 37–81.
22.
HsiehLFChinJBWuMC (2004) The performance indicators of university e-library in Taiwan. The Electronic Library22(4): 325–330.
23.
ISO (2001) Guidelines for the Justification and Development of Management System Standards. International Standard ISO Guide 72, Geneva, Switzerland.
24.
ISO (2014) ISO 11620 Information and Documentation – Library Performance Indicators. Geneva: ISO, pp. i-100
25.
KaplanRSNortonDP (1996) Linking the Balanced Scorecard to strategy. California Management Review39(1): 53–79.
26.
KieftenbeldVNatesanP (2013) Examining the measurement and structural invariance of LibQUAL+® across user groups. Library & Information Science Research35(2): 143–150.
27.
LebasMJ (1995) Performance Measurement and Performance Management. International Journal of Production Economics41(1–3): 23–35.
28.
LewisVet al. (2013) Building scorecards in academic research libraries: Performance measurement and organizational issues. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice8(2): 183–199.
LubiscoNML (2011) The University Library: Elements for Planning, Evaluation and Management. Salvador, Brazil: Edufba.
31.
McCaffreyC (2013) LibQUAL in Ireland: Performance assessment and service improvement in Irish university libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship39(4): 347–350.
32.
ManžuchZMacevičiuteE (2016) Performance evaluation as a tool for strategic decisions about serving visually impaired users: The case of the Lithuanian Library for the Blind. Library and Information Science Research38(2):161–169.
33.
MarôcoJ (2011) Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics. 5th edn.Lisbon: Sílabo.
34.
MartensenAGrønholdtL (2003) Improving library users’ perceived quality, satisfaction and loyalty: An integrated measurement and management system. Journal of Academic Librarianship29(3):140–147.
35.
MelloCTurrioniJMartinsR (2014) Guia para Elaboração de Monografia e TCC em Engenharia de Produção. São Paulo: Editora Atlas.
36.
NeelyA (1998) Measuring Business Performance. London: Economist Books.
37.
NeelyAAdamsCKennerleyM (2002) The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. London: Prentice Hall.
38.
NeelyAGregoryMPlattsK (1995) Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management15(4): 80–116.
39.
PoisterTH (2003) Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
PollRBoekhorstP (2007) Measuring quality: Performance measures in libraries. Munich: KG Saur.
41.
SelfJ (2003) From values to metrics: Implementation of the balanced scorecard at a university library. Performance Measurement and Metrics4(2): 57–63.
42.
WaalAKourtitK (2013) Performance measurement and management in practice. International Journal of Operations and Production Management62(5): 446–473.
43.
WilsonF (2013) The quality maturity model: Assessing organizational quality culture in academic libraries. Doctoral Dissertation, School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics, Brunel University, UK. Available at: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8747 (accessed 30 April 2016).
44.
XieH (2006) Evaluation of digital libraries: Criteria and problems from users’ perspectives. Library & Information Science Research28(3): 433–452.
