This is an exploratory study to model the determinants of actual use of a digital library system. To do so, a research model was developed using Delone and McLean’s information system success model and explained as an empirical study. Data were collected from 978 respondents using a structured questionnaire from four different universities of Malaysia. The findings showed that the quality factors of digital library systems have a strong influence on satisfaction, behavioral intention, and variance in actual use. Information quality is the strongest predictor to measure user satisfaction, and satisfaction has a strong effect on students’ behavioral intention to use the system. In addition, user satisfaction and behavioral intention to use the system also have a strong positive relationship with the actual use of a digital library system. In brief, behavioral intentions are greatly influenced by system quality, information quality and service quality.
AhmadRHashimLHarunN (2016) Criteria for effective authentic personal branding for academic librarians in Universiti Sains Malaysia Libraries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences224: 452–458.
2.
AhmatMAJaafarCRCAzmiNA (2016) The transformation of reference services in Hamzah Sendut Library, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences224: 6–13.
3.
AhnTRyuSHanI (2004) The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls. Electronic Commerce: Research and Applications3(4): 405–420.
4.
AllenIESeamanJ (2013) Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: Sloan Consortium.
5.
AlzahraniAStahlBPriorM (2012) Developing an instrument for e-public services’ acceptance using confirmatory factor analysis: Middle East context. Journal of Organization and End User Computing24(3):18–44.
6.
AlzahraniAIMahmudIRamayahTet al. (2016) Extending the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explain online game playing among Malaysian undergraduate students. Telematics and Informatics34(4): 239–251. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.07.001 (accessed 28 July 2017).
7.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
8.
BaileyJEPearsonSW (1983) Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science29(5): 530–545.
9.
BakarABABakeriA (2009) Education for digital libraries in Asian countries. In: Asia-Pacific conference on library & information education & practice, pp. 458–463. Available at: http://www.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/a-liep2009/proceedings/Papers/a25.pdf (accessed 28 July 2017).
10.
BharatiPBergD (2003) Managing information systems for service quality: A study from the other side. Information Technology & People16(2): 183–202.
11.
CalisirFAltin GumussoyCBayramA (2009) Predicting the behavioral intention to use enterprise resource planning systems: An exploratory extension of the technology acceptance model. Management Research News32(7): 597–613.
12.
ChenYH (2015) Testing the impact of an information literacy course: Undergraduates’ perceptions and use of the university libraries’ web portal. Library & Information Science Research37(3): 263–274.
13.
ChenYHChengalur-SmithI (2015) Factors influencing students’ use of a library Web portal: Applying course-integrated information literacy instruction as an intervention. The Internet and Higher Education26: 42–55. DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.005
14.
ChengYM (2014a) Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses’ continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People27(3): 230–258.
15.
ChengYM (2014b) Why do users intend to continue using the digital library? An integrated perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management66(6): 640–662.
16.
ChinWW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research295(2): 295–336.
17.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis: A Computer Program. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
ConnorE (2007) Medical librarian 2.0. Medical Reference Services Quarterly26(1): 1–15.
19.
CurranKMurrayMNorrbyDSet al. (2006) Involving the user through Library 2.0. New Review of Information Networking12(1): 47–59.
20.
DahanSMTaibMYZainudinNMet al. (2016) Surveying users’ perception of academic library services quality: A case study in Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP) Library. Journal of Academic Librarianship42(1): 38–43.
21.
DavisFDBagozziRPWarshawPR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35(8): 982–1003.
22.
DeLoneWH (1988) Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. MIS Quarterly12(1): 51–61.
23.
DeLoneWHMcLeanER (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research3(1): 60–95.
24.
DeLoneWHMcLeanER (2002) Information systems success revisited. In: 35th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS 2002, Big Island, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2002, pp. 2966–2976. IEEE.
25.
DeloneWHMcLeanER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems19(4): 9–30.
26.
DeloneWHMcLeanER (2004) Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce9(1): 31–47.
27.
DollWJTorkzadehG (1988) The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly12(2): 259–274.
28.
DollahWAKASinghD (2010) Determining the effectiveness of digital reference services in Malaysian academic libraries. The Reference Librarian51(4): 329–354.
29.
FornellCChaJ (1994) Partial least squares. Advanced Methods of Marketing Research407: 52–78.
30.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
31.
GefenDStraubDWBoudreauM-C (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems4(7): 1–77.
32.
HairJFRingleCMSarstedtM (2011) PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice19(2): 139–152.
33.
HairJFSarstedtMHopkinsLet al. (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review26(2):106–121.
34.
HamzahMFHishamRMusaISBet al. (2014) Knowledge production by librarians in Malaysia for evidence-based librarianship. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML)2: 509–518.
35.
HenselerJRingleCMSinkovicsRR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing (AIM)20: 277–320.
36.
HolmbergKHuvilaIKronqvist-BergMet al. (2009) What is library 2.0?Journal of Documentation65(4): 668–681.
37.
HsuCLLinJCC (2010) A study of the adoption behaviour for in-car GPS navigation systems. International Journal of Mobile Communications8(6): 603–624.
38.
HusseinRShahriza Abdul KarimNHasan SelamatM (2007) The impact of technological factors on information systems success in the electronic-government context. Business Process Management Journal13(5): 613–627.
39.
IivariJ (1987) User information satisfaction (UIS) reconsidered: An information system as the antecedent of UIS. In: Eighth international conference on information systems, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 57–73.
40.
IsmailNZRazakMRZakariahZet al. (2012) E-learning continuance intention among higher learning institution students in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences67: 409–415.
41.
JohariRZainabAN (2007) Identifying what services need to be improved by measuring the library’s performance. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science12(1): 35–53.
42.
KaurK (2006) Digital libraries in Malaysia: An overview with an E-services perspective. In: Information management for global access: International conference on digital libraries (ed. TERI), New Delhi, India, 5–8 December 2006.
43.
KimSLeeJW (2015) Developing a digital library model for virtual universities in Korea: Current state and prospective model. Information Development32(4): 1228–1239.
44.
KimYM (2011) Why should I use university library website resources? Discipline differences. Journal of Academic Librarianship37(1): 9–18.
45.
KlineRB (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd edn.New York: Guildford.
46.
KooCChungNKimDJ (2015) How do social media transform politics? The role of a podcast, ‘Naneun Ggomsuda’ in South Korea. Information Development31(5): 421–434.
47.
LeeKHTehKH (2001) Evaluation of academic library web sites in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science5(2): 95–108.
48.
LinHF (2007) Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. Cyberpsychology & Behavior10(6): 817–820.
49.
LuYZhouTWangB (2009) Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior25(1): 29–39.
50.
LwogaTE (2013) Measuring the success of library 2.0 technologies in the African context: The suitability of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Campus-Wide Information Systems30(4): 288–307.
MasonRO (1978) Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Information & Management1(4): 219–234.
53.
MassisEB (2014) What’s new in libraries: Innovation and rationalization to sustain the library’s future. New Library World115(5/6): 285–288.
54.
MayehMRamayahTPopaS (2014) The role of absorptive capacity in the usage of a complex information system: The case of the Enterprise Information System. Journal of Universal Computer Science20(6): 826–841.
55.
NegashSRyanTIgbariaM (2003) Quality and effectiveness in web-based customer support system. Information and Management40(8): 757–768.
56.
MasrekMNB (2007) Measuring campus portal effectiveness and the contributing factors. Campus-Wide Information Systems24(5): 342–354.
57.
OmarSZShaffrilHAMD’SilvaJLet al. (2014) Mapping the patterns and problems in using rural library services among rural youth in Malaysia. Information Development31(5): 393–404.
58.
PalviaPC (1996) A model and instrument for measuring small business user satisfaction with information technology. Information & Management31(3): 151–163.
59.
ParkCKimY (2008) The effect of information satisfaction and relational benefit on consumer’s online shopping site commitment. Web Technologies for Commerce and Services Online1: 149–169.
60.
ParkNRomanRLeeSet al. (2009) User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Information Management29(3): 196–209.
61.
PengDXLaiF (2012) Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. Journal of Operations Management30(6): 467–480.
62.
PituchKALeeYK (2006) The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education47(2): 222–244.
63.
PittLFWatsonRTKavanCB (1995) Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly19(2): 173–187.
64.
RaiALangSSWelkerRB (2002) Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical information analysis. Information Systems Research13(1): 50–69.
65.
RamayahT (2006) Interface characteristics, perceived ease of use and intention to use an digital library in Malaysia. Information Development22(2): 123–133.
66.
RamayahTAafaqiB (2004) Role of self-efficacy in e-library usage among students of a public university in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science9: 39–58.
67.
RamayahTLeeJWCBoeyJCI (2011) Network collaboration and performance in the tourism sector. Service Business5(4): 411–428.
68.
RamayahTYeapJALIgnatiusJ (2013) An empirical inquiry on knowledge sharing among academicians in higher learning institutions. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy51(2): 131–154.
69.
RanaNPDwivediYKWilliamsMDet al. (2015) Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers17(1): 127–142.
70.
RavichandranTRaiA (2000) Quality management in systems development: An organizational system perspective. MIS Quarterly24(3): 381–415.
RosemannMVesseyI (2004) On the applicability of the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontology to enterprise systems requirements. In:15th Australasian conference on information systems, pp. 232–235.
73.
SamadiIMasrekMNYatinSFBM (2014) The effect of individual characteristics and digital library characteristics on digital library effectiveness: A survey at University of Tehran. World Applied Sciences Journal30 (Innovation Challenges in Multidisciplinary Research & Practice): 214–220. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.icmrp.28
74.
SchauppLCFanWBelangerF (2006) Determining success for different website goals. In: 39th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS’06, Kauia, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2006, vol. 6, pp. 107b-107b. IEEE.
75.
SeddonPB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research8(3): 240–253.
76.
SeddonPBKiewMY (1994) A partial test and development of the Delone and McLean model of IS success. In: 15th international conference on information systems (ICIS 94), Vancouver, Canada.
ShannonCEWeaverW (1959) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
79.
ShaltoniAMKhraimHAbuhamadAet al. (2015) Exploring students’ satisfaction with universities’ portals in developing countries: A cultural perspective. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology32(2):82–93.
80.
ShenRVemuriNSFanWet al. (2006) Exploring digital libraries: Integrating browsing, searching, and visualization. In: 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, pp. 1–10. ACM.
81.
ShihYYHuangSS (2009) The actual usage of ERP systems: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology41(3): 263–276.
82.
ShinB (2003) An exploratory investigation of system success factors in data warehousing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems4(1):141–170.
83.
SilkKJPerraultEKLadensonSet al. (2015) The effectiveness of online versus in-person library instruction on finding empirical communication research. Journal of Academic Librarianship41(2): 149–154.
84.
StylianouACKumarRL (2000) An integrative framework for IS quality management. Communications of the ACM43(9): 99–104.
85.
TeoTS (2001) Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities. Internet Research11(2): 125–137.
86.
TeohZMTanAK (2011) Determinants of library use amongst university students. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science16(2): 21–31.
87.
TeowPLZainabAN (2003) Access to online databases at private colleges and universities in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science8(1): 91–102.
88.
UrbachNMüllerB (2012) The updated DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. In: YogeshKet al. (eds) Information Systems Theory. New York: Springer, pp. 1–18.
89.
VenkateshVMorrisMGDavisGBet al. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly27(3): 425–478.
90.
VinziVETrincheraLAmatoS (2010) PLS path modeling, From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In: VinziVEChinWW (eds) Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 47–82.
91.
WahabEShamsuddinAAbdullahNHet al. (2016) Users’ satisfaction and return on investment (ROI) for online database library databases: A Malaysian technical university perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences219: 777–783.
92.
WixomBHToddPA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research16(1): 85–102.
93.
WuJHWangYM (2006) Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information & Management43(6): 728–739.
94.
YanYZhaXZhangJet al. (2014) Comparing digital libraries with virtual communities from the perspective of e-quality. Library Hi Tech32(1): 173–189.
95.
YeGZhuXMukhopadhyaySK (2014) Managing service quality in multiple outsourcing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce18(3): 125–149.
96.
YorkACVanceJM (2009) Taking library instruction into the online classroom: Best practices for embedded librarians. Journal of Library Administration49(1/2): 197–209.
97.
YunHKettingerWJLeeCC (2012) A new open door: The smartphone’s impact on work-to-life conflict, stress, and resistance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce16(4): 121–152.
98.
ZhaXZhangJYanYet al. (2015) Does affinity matter? Slow effects of e-quality on information seeking in virtual communities. Library & Information Science Research37(1): 68–76.
