This study focused on poultry farmers’ preference of information sources for accessing poultry management information in three rural districts of Tanzania. A mixed methods research design was deployed. Questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data respectively. Responses to the questionnaire which was administered by researchers in face-to-face meetings were received from 360 farmers, and 160 farmers participated in 16 focus group discussions. The study was carried out from July to December 2013 in nine selected villages in Tanzania. The findings indicate that farmers preferred interpersonal and informal sources. Source preferences were influenced by availability and accessibility of the information source. The results suggest that farmers preferred listening and talking, probably a result of the oral tradition prevailing in rural areas. It is also probable that farmers enjoy interpersonal sources because they allow a two-way communication, provide quick access, immediate feedback, ease of use, and convey information specific to their local situations. Further studies on development and changes in farmers’ information source preference are required in order to better address their current and future information needs.
AdomiEEOgbomoMOInoniOE (2003) Gender factor in crop farmers’ access to agricultural information in rural areas of Delta State, Nigeria. Library Review52(8): 388–393.
2.
BokiJK (2000) Poultry industry in Tanzania with emphasis on small-scale rural poultry. In: Proceeding of the workshop on the possibilities for smallholder poultry projects in Eastern and Southern Africa (eds PedersenGPerminAMingaU), Morogoro, Tanzania, 22–25 May 2000, pp. 15–21.
3.
BozIOzcatalbasO (2010) Determining information sources used by crop producers: A case study of Gaziantep province in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research5(10): 980–987.
4.
ChakrabartiB (2001) Over the edge of information in the information age: Information behaviour of the Totos: A small marginal tribal community in Sub-Himalayan North Bengal, India. International Information and Library Review33(2–3): 167–180.
5.
ChapmanRSlaymakerT (2002) ICTs and Rural Development: Review of the Literature, Current Interventions and Opportunities for Action. Working Paper 192. London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
6.
ChilimoWL (2008) Information and communication technologies and sustainable livelihoods: A case of selected rural areas of Tanzania. PhD Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
7.
ChoKM (2004) Agricultural knowledge and information systems in Myanmar: Implications for technology dissemination and development. In: Rural poverty reduction through research for development, Deutscher Tropentag, Berlin, 5–7October2004.
8.
ConroyCAChandrasekaranDSharmaA. (2004) Understanding livestock keepers’ agricultural knowledge and information systems: A case study from India. In: Proceedings of a workshop on enhancing the contribution of small livestock to the livelihoods of resource-poor communities, (eds SmithTGodfreySHButteryPJ.), pp. 34–53. Aylesford, Kent, UK: Natural Resources International Ltd.
9.
DauduSChadoSSIgbashalAA (2009) Agricultural information sources utilized by farmers in Benue State, Nigeria. Publication Agriculture and Technology5(1): 39–48.
10.
DuttaR (2009) Information needs and information-seeking behavior in developing countries: A review of the research. International Information and Library Review41(1): 44–51.
11.
EggeMTongdeelertPRangsipahtS. (2011) Preferred sources of information among sorghum farmers in Awbere District of Somali Regional State, Ethiopia. Kasetsart Journal (Social Sciences) 32: 319–326.
12.
EllyTSilayoEE (2013) Agricultural information needs and sources of the rural farmers in Tanzania: A case of Iringa Rural District. Library Review62(8): 547–566.
13.
FisherKENaumerCDurranceJC. (2005) Something old, something new: Preliminary findings from an exploratory study about people’s information habits and information grounds. Information Research10(2). Available at: http://www.informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper223.html (accessed 28 January 2016).
14.
FisherKENaumerCM (2006) Information grounds: Theoretical basis and empirical findings on information flow in social settings. In: SpinkAColeC (eds) New Directions in Human Information Behavior. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 93–111.
15.
GarforthC (2001) Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems in Hagaz, Eritrea. Available at: http://www.fao.org/sd/2001/KN1001a_en.htm (accessed 12 April 2011).
16.
Ikoja-OdongoR (2002) Information needs and seeking behavior of artisan fisher folks of Uganda. Library and Information Science Research25(1): 89–105.
17.
Ikoja-OdongoROchollaDN (2003) Information needs and information-seeking behavior of artisan fisher folk of Uganda. Library and Information Science Research25(1): 89–105.
18.
JohnsonRBOnwuegbuzieAJ (2004) Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher33(7): 14–26.
19.
KanikiAM (1994) Information seeking and information providers among Zambian farmers. Libri41: 147–169.
KariHK (2007) Availability and accessibility of ICT in the rural communities of Nigeria. Electronic Library25(3): 363–372.
22.
KempsonE (1986) Information for self reliance and self determination: The role of community information services. IFLA Journal12(3): 182–191.
23.
Kiplang’atJ (1999) An analysis of the opportunities of information technology in improving access, transfer and use of agricultural information in the rural areas of Kenya. Library Management Journal20(1–2): 115–127.
24.
KollerMGrutterRPeltenburgM. (2001) Use of the Internet by medical doctors in Switzerland. Swiss Medical Weekly131(17/18): 251–254.
25.
KuhlthauCC (1991) Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science42(5): 361–371.
26.
KuponiyiFA (2000) Mass media in agricultural development, the use of radio by farmers of Akinyele local government area of Oyo State, Nigeria. Nigerian Agricultural Development Studies1(1): 26–32.
27.
LwogaETStilwellCNgulubeP (2011) Access and use of agricultural information and knowledge in Tanzania. Library Review60(5): 383–395.
28.
MsamiHM (2000) Studies on the structure and problems of family poultry production in Tanzania. Paper presented at the 2nd research coordination meeting of the co-coordinated research programme on improvement of health and management of family poultry production in Africa, Morogoro, Tanzania, 4–8 September 2000. Available at: http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/aph/public/10-studies-msami.pdf (accessed 20 July 2011).
29.
NeumanWL (2006) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 6th edn.Boston, MA: Pearson.
30.
NgulubeP (2010) Mapping mixed methods research in library and information science journals in Sub-Saharan Africa 2004–2008. International Information and Library Review42(4): 252–261.
31.
NjokuIF (2004) The information needs and information-seeking behaviour of fishermen in Lagos State, Nigeria. International Information and Library Review36(4): 297–307.
NyarezaSDickAL (2012) Use of community radio to communicate agricultural information to Zimbabwe’s peasant farmers. Aslib Proceedings64(5): 494–508.
34.
OdiniS (2014) Access to and use of agricultural information by small scale women farmers in support of efforts to attain food security in Vihiga County, Kenya. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences5(2): 100–107.
35.
OkwuOJDauduS (2011) Extension communication channels’ usage and preference by farmers in Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development3(5): 88–94.
36.
OkwuOJKukuAAAbaJI (2007) An assessment of use of radio in agricultural information dissemination: A case study of radio Benue in Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research2(1): 14–18.
37.
OriakhiHOkoedo-OkojieDU (2013) Arable crop farmers’ preference for agricultural information sources and adoption of technology in Edo State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science3(1): 31–35.
38.
RamirezRQuarryW (2004) Communication and strategies in the age of decentralization and privatization of rural services: Lessons from two African experiences. Agricultural Research and Extension Network Paper136. Available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/work/projects/agren/papers/agrenpaper_136.pdf (accessed 10 February 2011).
39.
ReesDJMomanyiMWekundahJ. (2000) Agricultural knowledge and information systems in Kenya: Implications for technology dissemination and development. Agricultural Research and Extension Network Paper107. Available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/agren/papers/agrenpaper_107.pdf (accessed 19 May 2011).
40.
RezvanfarAMoradnezhadiHVahediM (2007) Information needs of farm women related to dairy farming and home management in Ilam State of Iran. Livestock Research for Rural Development19(8). Available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/8/rezv19113.htm (accessed 28 January 2016).
41.
SavolainenR (1995) Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of ‘way of life’. Library and Information Science Research17(3): 259–294.
42.
SavolainenR (2007) Information source horizons and source preferences of environmental activists: A social phenomenological approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(12): 1709–1719.
43.
SavolainenR (2008) Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information. Information Processing and Management44(1): 274–293.
44.
SavolainenR (2010) Source preference criteria in the context of everyday projects: Relevance judgments made by prospective home buyers. Journal of Documentation66(1): 70 –92.
45.
TireM (2006) An evaluation of the information dissemination mechanisms for small scale subsistence farmers. MA Thesis, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
