This paper describes data literacy and emphasizes its importance. Data literacy is vital for researchers who need to become data literate science workers and also for (potential) data management professionals. Its important characteristic is a close connection and similarity to information literacy. To support this argument, a review of literature was undertaken on the importance of data, and the data-intensive paradigm of scientific research, researchers’ expected and real behaviour, the nature of research data management, the possible roles of the academic library, data quality and data citation, Besides describing the nature of data literacy and enumerating the related skills, the application of phenomenographic approaches to data literacy and its relationship to the digital humanities have been identified as subjects for further investigation.
ACRL (2013) Intersections of Scholarly Communication and Information Literacy: Creating Strategic Collaborations for a Changing Academic Environment. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Available at: http://acrl.ala.org/intersections/ (accessed 5 June 2015).
2.
ACRL (2014) ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. Top ten trends in academic libraries. A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College and Research Libraries News75(6): 294–302.
AltmanMCrosasM (2013) The evolution of data citation: From principles to implementation. IASSIST Quarterly37(Spring): 62–70.
6.
BawdenD (2008) Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In: LankshearCKnobelM (eds) Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 17–32.
7.
BonnM (2014) Tooling up. Scholarly communication education and training. College and Research Libraries News75(3): 132–135.
8.
BorgmanC (2007) Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BorgmanC (2010) Research data: Who will share what, with whom, when, and why? In: China-North America library conference, Beijing, China, 9–10 September 2010. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/borgman/238 (accessed 5 June 2015).
10.
BorgmanC (2012) The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(6): 1059–1078.
11.
BosanquetL (2010) Building relevance amidst the content revolution. Library Management31(3): 133–144.
12.
BoydDCrawfordK (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication and Society15(5): 662–679.
13.
BradfordPWurmanRS (1996) Information Architects. Zürich: Graphis.
14.
BruceC (1997) The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
15.
BucklandM (2011) Data management as bibliography. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology37(6): 34–37.
16.
BundyA (2004) Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework. Principles, Standards and Practice. 2nd edn. Adelaide: Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy.
17.
Calzada PradoJMarzalMA (2013) Incorporating data literacy into information literacy programs: Core competencies and contents. Libri63(2): 123–134.
18.
CarlsonJFosmireMMillerCC. (2011) Determining data information literacy needs: A study of students and research faculty. Portal: Libraries and the Academy11(2): 629–657.
19.
CarlsonJJohnstonLWestraB. (2013) Developing an approach for data management education: A report from the Data Information Literacy Project. International Journal of Digital Curation8(1): 204–217. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.254.
20.
CarlsonJStowell BrackeM (2015) Planting the seeds for data literacy: Lessons learned from a student-centered education program. International Journal of Digital Curation10(1): 95–110.
CoiroJKnobelMLankshearC. (2008) Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In: CoiroJKnobelMLankshearC. (eds) The Handbook of Research on New Literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 25–32.
24.
CorrallSKennanMAAfzalW (2013) Bibliometrics and research data management services: Emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends61(3): 636–674.
25.
CoxAMCorrallS (2013) Evolving academic library specialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology64(8): 1526–1542.
26.
CoxAMPinfieldS (2013) Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science46(4): 299–316.
27.
CoxAMPinfieldSSmithJ (2014). Moving a brick building: UK libraries coping with research data management as a ‘wicked’problem. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. DOI: 10.1177/0961000614533717.
28.
Data Citation Synthesis Group (2014) Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. Available at: http://www.force11.org/datacitation (accessed 5 June 2015).
29.
Davis-KahlSFishelTAHensleyM K (2014) Weaving the threads Scholarly communication and information literacy. College and Research Libraries News75(8): 441–444.
JahnkeLAsherAKeralisSD (2012) The Problem of Data. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
40.
JohnsonCA (2012) The Information Diet: A Case for Conscious Consumption. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
41.
KoltayT (2015) Data literacy: In search of a name and identity. Journal of Documentation71(2): 401–415.
42.
KruseFThestrupJB (2014) Research libraries’ new role in research data management, current trends and visions in Denmark. Liber Quarterly23(4): 310–335.
43.
LiSXiaozheZWenmingX. (2013) The cultivation of scientific data specialists: Development of LIS education oriented to e-science service requirements. Library Hi Tech31(4): 700–724.
44.
LimbergLSundinOTaljaS (2012) Three theoretical perspectives on information literacy. HUMAN IT11(2): 93–130.
45.
LivingstoneSWijnenCWPapaioannouT. (2014) Situating media literacy in the changing media environment: Critical insights from European research on audiences. In: CarpentierNSchrøderKCHallettL (eds) Audience Transformations: Shifting Audience Positions in Late Modernity. Routledge Studies in European Communication Research and Education. London: Routledge, pp. 210–227.
46.
LoukidesM (2011) The Evolution of Data Products. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
47.
LynchC (2009) Jim Gray’s Fourth Paradigm and the construction of the scientific record. In: HeyTTansleySTolleKM (eds) The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond: WA, Microsoft Research, pp. 177–183.
48.
LyonL (2012) The informatics transform: Re-engineering libraries for the data decade. International Journal of Digital Curation7(1): 126–138.
49.
MaceviciuteE (2014) Research libraries in a modern environment. Journal of Documentation70(2): 282–302.
50.
MacMillanD (2014) Data sharing and discovery: What librarians need to know. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(5): 541–549.
51.
MacMillanD (2015) Developing data literacy competencies to enhance faculty collaborations. LIBER Quarterly24(3): 140–160.
52.
MadridMM (2013) A study of digital curator competences: A survey of experts. International Information and Library Review45(3/4): 149–156.
53.
MandinachEBGummerES (2013) A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher42(1): 30–37.
54.
MarcumD (2015) Educating the Research Librarian: Are We Falling Short?New York: Ithaka S+R.
55.
MerrillA (2011) Library+. Public Services Quarterly7(3/4): 144–148.
56.
MooneyH (2013) A practical approach to data citation: The Special Interest Group on Data Citation and development of the Quick Guide to Data Citation. IASSIST Quarterly37: 71–77.
57.
MooneyHNewtonMP (2012) The anatomy of a data citation: Discovery, reuse, and credit. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication1(1): 1–14.
58.
NielsenHJHjørlandB (2014) Curating research data: The potential roles of libraries and information professionals. Journal of Documentation70(2): 221–240.
59.
National Science Board (2005) Long-Lived Digital Data Collections: Enabling Research and Education in the 21st Century. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
PeroniSGrayTDuttonA. (2015) Setting our bibliographic references free: Towards open citation data. Journal of Documentation71(2): 253–277.
62.
PerryGJRodererNKAssarS (2005) A current perspective on medical informatics and health sciences librarianship. Journal of the Medical Library Association93(2): 199–205. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1082936/ (accessed 5 June 2015).
63.
PryorG (2012) Why manage research data? In: PryorG (ed.) Managing Research Data. London: Facet, pp. 1–16.
64.
QinJD’IgnazioJ (2010) Lessons learned from a two-year experience in science data literacy education. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual IATUL conference, 20–24 June 2010, 2. Available at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/5 (accessed 5 June 2015).
65.
RamírezML (2011) Opinion: Whose role is it anyway? A library practitioner’s appraisal of the digital data deluge. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology37(5): 21–23.
ReillySK (2014) Rounding up the data: Libraries pushing new frontiers. Learned Publishing27(5): 33–34.
68.
RiehSY (2002) Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology53(2): 145–161.
69.
SchieldM (2004) Information literacy, statistical literacy and data literacy. IASSIST Quarterly28(2/3): 6–11. Available at: http://www.statlit.org/pdf/2005SchieldIASSIST.pdf (accessed 5 June 2015).
SchneiderR (2013) Research data literacy. In: KurbanogluS. (eds) Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice. Cham: Springer International, pp. 1–16.
72.
SCONUL (2011) The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy. Core Model for Higher Education. London: Society of College, National and University Libraries Working Group on Information Literacy.
73.
SeadleM (2012) Library hi tech and information science. Library Hi Tech30(2): 205–209.
74.
ShorishY (2015) Data information literacy and undergraduates: A critical competency. College and Undergraduate Libraries22(1): 97–106.
75.
SiLZhuangXXingW. (2013) The cultivation of scientific data specialists: Development of LIS education oriented to e-science service requirements. Library Hi Tech31(4): 700–724.
76.
SmithS (2013) Is data the new media?EContent36(2): 14–19.
77.
SoehnerCSteevesCWardJ (2010) E-Science and Data Support Services: A Study of ARL Member Institutions. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
78.
StephensonESchifter CaravelloP (2007) Incorporating data literacy into undergraduate information literacy programs in the social sciences: A pilot project. Reference Services Review35(4): 525–540.
79.
StuartD (2011) Facilitating access to the Web of Data. London: Facet.
80.
SulaCA (2013) Digital humanities and libraries: A conceptual model. Journal of Library Administration53(1): 10–26.
81.
TenopirCBirchBAllardS (2012) Academic Libraries and Research Data Services. Current Practices and Plans for the Future. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
82.
TenopirCAllardSDouglassK. (2011) Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PloS One6(6): e21101.
83.
TenopirC. (2013) Academic librarians and research data services: Preparation and attitudes. IFLA Journal39(1): 70–78.
84.
TenopirC. (2014) Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians. Library and Information Science Research36(2): 84–90.
85.
Torres-SalinasDMartín-MartínAFuente-GutiérrezE (2014) Analysis of the coverage of the Data Citation Index – Thomson Reuters: Disciplines, document types and repositories. Revista Española de Documentación Científica37(1): e036.
VerbaanECoxAM (2014) Occupational sub-cultures, jurisdictional struggle and Third Space: Theorising professional service responses to Research Data Management. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(3/4): 211–219.
88.
Vitae (2011) Researcher Development Framework. Cambridge: Careers Research and Advisory Centre.
89.
VlaeminckSWagnerGG (2014) On the role of research data centres in the management of publication-related research data. Liber Quarterly23(4): 336–357.
90.
WongGK (2010) Facilitating students’ intellectual growth in information literacy teaching. Reference and User Services Quarterly50(2): 114–118.
91.
YatesCPartridgeHBruceC (2012) Exploring information experiences through phenomenography. Library and Information Research36(112): 96–119.
