The qualitative methodology phenomenography has been successfully used to determine the range of information literacy experiences of defined groups and professions. Phenomenographic method is believed to yield research findings which give a richer and more accurate picture of what information literacy means in practical terms. The archetypal definitions of the limited but interrelated experiences of information literacy that a phenomenographic study provides have been used as a basis of evidence-based information literacy educational interventions (Andretta, 2007). What are the epistemological ideas behind phenomenography and what are the data collection and analysis procedures based on its philosophical underpinnings? The key principles as described in the literature are discussed in this paper, beginning with the early work of Marton (1986). The use of phenomenography to research information literacy experience began with Christine Bruce’s (1997) seminal work. The value of the work of Bruce and her followers have been recently recognized by ACRL (2014).
AflagueJMFersztGG (2010) Suicide assessment by psychiatric nurses: A phenomenographic study. Issues in Mental Health Nursing31(4): 248–256.
4.
ÅkerlindGS (2005a) Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development24(4): 321–334.
5.
ÅkerlindGS (2005b) Learning about phenomenography: Interviewing, data analysis and the qualitative research paradigm. In: BowdenJGreenP (eds) Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press, pp. 63–73.
6.
ÅkerlindGS (2005c) Phenomenographic methods: A case illustration. In: BowdenJGreenP (eds) Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press, pp. 103–127.
7.
ÅkerlindGSBowdenJGreenP (2005) Learning to do phenomenography: A reflective discussion. In: BowdenJGreenP (eds) Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne, RMIT University Press, pp. 74–100.
8.
AndrettaS (2007) Phenomenography: A conceptual framework for information literacy education. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives59(2): 152–168.
9.
AndrettaS (2010) Ways of experiencing information literacy: Perception and practice amongst Information Management postgraduate students. Unpublished PhD Thesis, London, Institute of Education.
10.
ArvidssonBLöfgrenHFridlundB (2001) Psychiatric nurses’ conceptions of how a group supervision programme in nursing care influences their professional competence: A 4-year follow-up study. Journal of Nursing Management9(3): 161–171.
11.
AshworthPLucasU (1998) What is the ‘World’ of phenomenography?Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research42(4): 415–431.
12.
AshworthPLucasU (2000) Achieving empathy and engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education25(3): 295–308.
13.
BowdenJA (1994) Phenomenographic research: A personal experience. In: BowdenJAWalshE (eds) Phenomenographic Research: Variations in Method. Melbourne: EQARD, RMIT, pp. 43–55.
14.
BowdenJA (2005) Reflections on the phenomenographic team research process. In: BowdenJAGreenP (eds) Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press, pp. 11–31.
15.
BrammerJD (2008) RN as gatekeeper: Gatekeeping as monitoring and supervision. Journal of Clinical Nursing17(14): 1868–1876.
16.
BrettleA (2007) Evaluating information skills training in health libraries: A systematic review. Health Information & Libraries Journal24(Suppl 1): 18–37.
17.
BruceC (1997) Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: AUSLIB Press.
18.
BruceCEdwardsSLuptonM (2006) Six frames for information literacy education: A conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. Italics5(1): 1–18. Available at: http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/italics/vol5–1/pdf/sixframes_final%20_1_.pdf (accessed 13 September 2014).
19.
Dall’AlbaG (1994) Reflections on some faces of phenomenography. In: BowdenJWalshE (eds) Phenomenographic Research: Variations in Method. Melbourne: EQARD, RMIT, pp. 73–88.
20.
EntwistleNJ (1997) Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development16(2): 127–134.
21.
ForsterM (2013) A phenomenographic investigation into information literacy in nursing practice: Preliminary findings and methodological issues. Nurse Education Today 33(10): 1237–1241.
22.
ForsterM (2014) 6 Ways of experiencing information literacy in nursing: The findings of a phenomenographic study. Nurse Education Today. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.005 (accessed 1 October 2014).
23.
HoytREBaileyNYoshihashiA (2012) Health Informatics: Practical Guide for Healthcare and Information Technology Professionals. 5th edn.Raleigh, NC: Lulu.
24.
IrvinLR (2005) Creating categories of description using phenomenographic data: An example of analytical process. In: KnightBA. (eds) Researching Educational Capital in a Technological Age. Teneriffe, Queensland: Post Pressed, pp. 101–120.
25.
KaminskyE (2009) Telenurses’ understanding of work: Detective or educator?Journal of Advanced Nursing65(2): 382–390.
26.
KuhlthauCC (1988) Developing a model of the library search process: Cognitive and affective aspects. RQ28(2): 232–242.
27.
KuhlthauCC (1993) Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
28.
LimbergL (1999) Three conceptions of information seeking a use. In: WilsonTDAllenDK (eds) Exploring the Contexts of Information Behavior. London: Taylor and Graham, pp. 116–135.
29.
LuptonM (2008) Evidence, argument and social responsibility: First-year students’ experiences of information literacy when researching an essay. Higher Education Research & Development27(4): 399–414.
30.
MartonF (1986) Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought21(3): 28–49.
31.
MartonF (1988) Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. In: ShermanRRWebbRB (eds) Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods. London: RoutledgeFarmer, pp. 141–161.
32.
MartonF (1994) Phenomenography. In: HusenTPostlethwaiteTN (eds) International Encyclopedia of Education, vol. 8, 2nd edn.London: Pergamon, pp. 4424–4429.
33.
MartonFBoothS (1997) Learning and Awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
MaybeeC (2006) Undergraduate perceptions of information use: The basis for creating user-centered student information literacy instruction. Journal of Academic Librarianship32(1): 79–85.
35.
ProsserM (1994) Some experiences of using phenomenographic research methodology in the context of research in teaching and learning. In: BowdenJWalshE (eds) Phenomenographic Research: Variations in Method. Melbourne: EQARD, RMIT, pp. 31–43.
36.
RCN (Royal College of Nursing) (2011) RCN Competencies: Finding, Using and Managing Information: Nursing, Midwifery, Health and Social Care Information Literacy Competencies. Available at: http://www.rcn.org.uk/data/assets/pdf_file/0007/357019/003847.pdf. (accessed 12 August 2014).
SvenssonL (1989) The conceptualization of cases of physical motion. European Journal of Psychology of Education4(4): 529–545.
39.
SvenssonL (1997) Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research and Development16(2): 191–202.
40.
Toledano O’FarrillR (2008) Conceptions of effective information use and learning in a tele-health organization: A phenomenographic study of information literacy and knowledge management at work. PhD Thesis. The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
41.
WalshA (2009) Information literacy assessment: Where do we start?Journal of Librarianship and Information Science41(1): 19–28.
