This article examines evidence of information literacy in the context of legal education and legal practice in Nigeria. It seeks to explore the application of Kuhlthau’s Information Search Process model as the dominant framework used in investigating issues of uncertainty and task complexity in a study conducted among graduate lawyers in Nigeria. The article provides an analysis of the empirical validity of the model in investigating the connection between learning, experience and the development of expertise among novice practitioners in the legal workplace in Nigeria. Data were obtained using quantitative and qualitative approaches while a case study method was employed for the study. Based on the findings of the study, the article offers insight into the role of the cognitive and affective dimensions in information seeking and the implications they have on issues of curriculum design, teaching methods and learning experiences in the context of legal education and practice in Nigeria.
AndersonTD (2006) Uncertainty in action: Observation information seeking within the creative processes of scholarly research. Information Research12(1): Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/12–1/paper283.html (accessed 20 October 2011).
5.
ArcherJPetersMM (1986) Law Student Stress. NASPA Journal23(4): 49–55.
6.
BilletS (2000) Guided learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning12(7): 272–290.
7.
BoonSJohnstonBWebberS (2007) A phenomenographic study of English faculty’s conceptions of information literacy. Journal of Documentation63(2): 204–228.
8.
BruceCS (2000) Information literacy research: Dimensions of the emerging collective consciousness. Australian Academic and Research Libraries31(2): 91–109. Available at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46274/2/46274.pdf (accessed 11 April 2013).
9.
BrunerJ (1966) Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
ByströmKJarvelinK (1995) Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Seeking and Management31(2): 191–213.
11.
CaseD (2006) Information behaviour. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology40: 293–327.
12.
CheukB (1998) Modelling the information seeking and use process in the workplace: Employing sense-making approach. Information Research4(2): Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/4–2/isic/cheuk.html (accessed 2 April 2011).
13.
CheukB (2002) Information literacy in the workplace: Issues, best practices and challenges. White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, Czech Republic. Available at: http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/cheuk-fullpaper.pdf (accessed 9 August 2006).
14.
CheukB (2008) Delivering business value through information literacy in the workplace. Libri58: 137–143.
15.
CheukBW (2000) Exploring information literacy in the workplace: A process approach. In: BruceCSCandyP (eds) Information Literacy Around the World: Advances in Programs and Research. Wagga Wagga, NSW: Charles Stuart University. Occasional Publications No. 1, pp. 177–191.
16.
CorreiaARTeixeiraJC (2002) Information literacy in the electronic publishing age. In: CarvalhoJAHüblerABaptistaAA (eds) Technology interactions: Proceedings of the 6th international ICCC/IFIP conference on electronic publishing, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic, 6–8 November 2002. Berlin: Elpub Proceedings, VWF Berlin, pp.1–15. Available at: http://elpub.scix.net/data/works/att/02–01.content.pdf (accessed 30 September 2010).
17.
Council of Legal Education (2009) 2009/2010 Curriculum, Lesson Plans and Case Studies. Bwari, Abuja: Nigerian Law School, pp. 1–500.
18.
DavidsonS (2010) Way beyond legal research: Understanding the research habits of legal scholars. Law Library Journal102(4): 562–579.
19.
Du PlessisT (2008) Competitive legal professionals’ use of technology in legal practice and legal research. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal21(4): Available at http://www.saflii.org/za/journals/PER/2008/21.html (accessed 27 March 2012).
20.
Du PlessisTDu ToitASA (2006) Knowledge management and legal practice. International Journal of Information Management26(5): 360–371.
HarunaIMabawonkuI (2001) Information needs and seeking behaviour of legal practitioners and the challenges of law libraries in Nigeria. International Information and Library Review33(1): 69–87.
23.
HyldegårdJ (2006) Collaborative information behavior: Exploring Kuhlthau’s Information Search Process model in a group-based educational setting. Information Processing and Management42(1): 276–298.
24.
HyldegårdJ (2009) Beyond the search process: Exploring group members’ information behaviour in context. Information Processing and Management45(1): 142–158.
25.
Ikoja-OdongoROchollaDN (2003) Information needs and information-seeking behavior of artisan fisher folk of Uganda. Library and Information Science Research25(1): 89–105.
26.
IsbellDKammerlocherL (1998) Implementing Kuhlthau: A new model for library and reference instruction. Reference Services Review26(3/4): 33–44.
27.
JohnsonRBOnwuegbuzieAJ (2004) A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher33(7): 14–26.
KellyGA (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: WW Norton.
30.
KirkJ (2004) Information and work: Extending the roles of information professionals. Challenging ideas: Proceedings of the ALIA 2004 biennial conference, Gold Coast, 21–24 September 2004. Available at: http://conferences.alia.org.au/alia2004/pdfs/kirk.j.paper.pdf (accessed 11 September 2010).
KuhlthauCC (1991) Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science42(5): 361–371.
33.
KuhlthauCC (1993) Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Westport, CT: Ablex.
KuhlthauCC (1999) Accommodating the user’s Information Search Process: Challenges for information retrieval system designers. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science25(3): 12–16.
36.
KuhlthauCC (2004) Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. 2nd edn.London: Libraries Unlimited.
37.
KuhlthauCC (2010) ELIS – Information Search Process. In: BatesMJMaackMN (eds) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. 3rd edn.New York: CRC Press, vol. 3, pp. 1–19.
38.
KuhlthauCCTamaSL (2001) Information Search Process, a call for ‘just for me’ information services. Journal of Documentation57(1): 25–43.
39.
KuhlthauCCHeinstromJToddRJ (2008) The ISP revisited: Is the model still useful?Information Research13(4): Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/13–4/paper355.html (accessed 10 September 2009).
40.
LeckieGJ (2005) General model of the information seeking of professionals. In: FisherKErdelezESMcKechnieL (eds) Theories of Information Behaviour. ASIST monograph series. Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 158–163.
41.
LeckieGJPettigrewKSylvainC (1996) Modelling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, healthcare professionals and lawyersLibrary Quarterly66(2): 161–193.
42.
LeideJColeCBeheshtiJ. (2007) Task based information retrieval: Structuring undergraduate history essays for better course evaluation using essay-type visualizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(9): 1227–1241.
43.
LimbergL (1997) Information use for learning purposes. In: VakkariPSavolainenRDervinB (eds) Information seeking in context: Proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts, Tampere, Finland, 14–16 August 1996. London: Taylor Graham, pp. 275–289.
44.
LimbergLSundinO (2006) Teaching information seeking: Relating information literacy education to theories of information behaviour. Information Research12(1): Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/12–1/paper280.html (accessed 2 April 2011).
45.
LloydA (2003) Information literacy: The meta-competency of the knowledge economy. An exploratory paper. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science35(2): 87–92.
46.
LloydA (2005) Information literacy: Different contexts, different concepts, different truths?Journal of Library and Information Science37(2): 82–88.
47.
LloydA (2007) Recasting information literacy as a socio-cultural practice: Implications for LIS researchers. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on conceptions of LIS, Featuring the Future. COLIS 34. Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/12–4/colis34.html (accessed 10 December 2013).
48.
LloydA (2010) Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation66(2): 245–258.
49.
MakriS (2008) A study of lawyers’ information behaviour leading to the development of two methods for evaluating electronic resources. PhD Thesis, University College London, UK.
50.
MoonJA (2004) Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning. London: Routledge-Falmer.
51.
MühlbacherSHammwöhnerRWolffC (2008) Workplace information literacy in the scientific field: An empirical analysis using the semantic differential approach. In: Kohl-FreyOSchmid-RuheB (eds) Advanced Users: Information Literacy and Customized Services. Konstanz: Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz, pp. 115–133.
52.
MutchA (1999) Critical realism, managers and information. British Journal of Information Management10(4): 323–333.
53.
NahlD (2001) A conceptual framework for explaining information behaviour. Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education1(2): 1–15.
54.
NgulubePMokwatloKNdwandweS (2009) Utilisation and prevalence of mixed methods research in library and information research in South Africa 2002–2008. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science75(2): 105–116.
Okoye OrdorAO (2007) Constructing a clinical legal education approach for large multicultural classes: Insights from the Nigerian Law School. International Journal of Clinical Legal Education11: 65–78.
58.
OtikeJMatthewsG (2000) Legal information needs of lawyers in Kenya: A case study. Library Management21(5): 241–251.
59.
PunchKF (1998) Introduction to Social Research Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: SAGE.
60.
RosenbergV (2002) Information literacy and small business. White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, Czech Republic. Available at: http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/rosenberg (accessed 22 August 2010).
61.
RossouwTFourieI (2007) Current awareness services (CAS) available via the World Wide Web (WWW) in respect of legal information. Mousaion25(1): 66–81.
SpinkAWilsonT (1998) Modeling Users’ Successive Searches in Digital Environments A National Science Foundation/British Library Funded Study. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april98/04spink.html (accessed 10 April 2013).
64.
StilwellC (2002) The case for informationally based social inclusion for sex workers: A South African exploratory study. Libri52: 67–77.
65.
SundinO (2008) Negotiations on information-seeking expertise: A study of web-based tutorials for information literacy. Journal of Documentation64(1): 24–44.
66.
TaljaSTuominenKSavolainenR (2005) ‘Isms’ in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation61(1): 79–101.
67.
TeddlieCTashakkoriA (2009) Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
TuominenTSavolainenRTaljaS (2005) Information literacy as a socio-technical practice. Library Quarterly75(3): 329–345.
71.
VakkariP (1999) Task complexity, problem structure and information actions integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing and Management35(6): 819–837.
72.
VygotskyL (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
WallDSJohnstoneJ (1997) The industrialization of legal practice and the rise of the new electric lawyer: The impact of IT in the legal practice in the UK. International Journal of the Sociology of Law25(2): 95–116.
74.
WilkinsonMA (2001) Information sources used by lawyers in problem solving: An empirical exploration. Library and Information Research23(3): 257–276.
75.
WilsonTD (1999) Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation55(3): 249–270.
