What is Librarian 2.0 – New competencies or interactive relations? A library professional viewpoint

Abstract

Library 2.0 is a change in the way libraries interact with their users. Technological developments on the Web have had a major influence on these changes. The change also places new requirements on librarians’ competencies and skills. This research investigates how librarians themselves see this change in terms of their work identity and working knowledge. The research shows what kinds of qualities and characteristics are expected from a ‘Librarian 2.0’, according to a group of professional librarians. The results associate ‘Librarian 2.0’ firmly with the Web, although some of the more traditional characteristics of librarianship have retained their relevance. This research also shows that the change towards a ‘Librarian 2.0’ can be seen as intimidating by some librarians, a fact that has to be taken into account when libraries develop their future strategies.

Keywords

Competence co-word analysis librarian Librarian 2.0 profession

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

(1988) The system of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Abbott

(1998) Professionalism and the future of librarianship. Library Trends 46(3): 430–443.

Abram

(2008) Social libraries. The Librarian 2.0 phenomenon. Library Resources and Technical Services 52(2): 19–22.

Aharony

(2009) Web 2.0 use by librarians. Library & Information Science Research 31(1): 29–37.

Ashcroft

(2004) Developing competencies, critical analysis and personal transferable skills in future information professionals. Library Review 53(2): 82–88.

Baruchson-Arbib

Bronstein

(2002) A view to the future of the library and information science profession: A Delphi study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(5): 397–408.

Bennett

Maton

Kervin

(2008) The digital natives debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 39(5): 775–786.

Boyack

Klavans

Börner

(2005), Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64(3): 351–374.

Broady-Preston

(2009) Professional education, development and training in a Web 2.0 environment: A case study of the UK. New Library World 110(5/6): 265–279.

10.

Brophy

(2007) The Library in the Twenty-First Century. 2nd edn. London: Facet.

11.

Cassner

Adams

(2006) Assessing the professional development needs of distance librarians and academic libraries. Journal of Library Administration 45(1): 81–99.

12.

Chan

Auster

(2003) Factors contributing to the professional development of reference librarians. Library & Information Science Research 25(3): 265–286.

13.

Chawner

(2008) Spectators, not players: Information managers’ use of Web 2.0 in New Zealand. Electronic Library 26(5): 630–649.

14.

Courtial

(1994) A co-word analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics 31(3): 251–260.

15.

Cullen

(2008a) Professionalizing knowledge sharing and communications. Business Information Review 25(1): 53–57.

16.

Cullen

(2008b) Catalyzing innovation and knowledge sharing: Librarian 2.0. Business Information Review 25(4): 253–258.

17.

Drejer

(2002) Strategic Management and Core Competencies : Theory and Application. Westport, CN: Quorum Books.

18.

Foss

Knudsen

(1996) Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm. London and New York: Routledge.

19.

Fourie

(2004) Librarians and the claiming of new roles: How can we try to make a difference? Aslib Proceedings 56(1): 62–74.

20.

Hager

Beckett

(1995) Philosophical underpinnings of the integrated conception of competence. Educational Philosophy and Theory 27(1): 1–24.

21.

(1999) Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends 48(1): 133–159.

22.

Hjørland

(2000) Library and information science: Practice, theory, and philosophical basis. Information Processing and Management 36(3): 501–531.

23.

Holmberg

Huvila

Kronqvist-Berg

. (2009) What is Library 2.0? Journal of Documentation 65(4): 668–681.

24.

Joint

(2006) Digital libraries and the future of the library profession. Library Review 56(1): 12–23.

25.

Kealy

(2009) Do library staff have what it takes to be a librarian of the future? Library Management 30(8/9): 572–582.

26.

Kosmala

Herrbach

(2006) The ambivalence of professional identity: On cynicism and jouissance in audit firms. Human Relations 59(10): 1393–1428.

27.

Martell

(2003) The role of librarians in the twenty-first century. In: Drake

(ed.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 2524–2536.

28.

Meschi

P-X

Cremer

(2005) Competence building, corporate renewal and value creation - A case study. In: Sanchez

Heene

(eds) Advances in Applied Business Strategy, Vol.9. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 305–325.

29.

Olander

(2009) Framgångspotential: Egenskapsfaktorer vid rekryteringen av bibliotekarier. Lund: BIVIL.

30.

Olander

Berry

(1992) Framtidens bibliotek på låntagarnas villkor. In: Blomberg

Widbäck

(eds) Biblioteket som serviceföretag: Kunden i centrum. Stockholm: Forskningsrådsnämnden, pp. 103–119.

31.

Olsson

(1995) Det datoriserade biblioteket: Maskindrömmar på 70-talet. Linköping: Linköpings Universitet.

32.

Partridge

Lee

Munro

(2010a) Becoming ‘Librarian 2.0’: The skills, knowledge, and attributes required by library and information science professionals in a Web 2.0 world (and beyond). Library Trends 59(1/2): 315–335.

33.

Partridge

Menzies

Lee

. (2010b) The contemporary librarian: Skills, knowledge and attributes required in a world of emerging technologies. Library and Information Science Research 32(4): 265–271.

34.

Pedersen

(2006) Librarianship: From collections control to tools understanding. New Library World 107(11/12): 538–551.

35.

Peltier-Davis

(2009) Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Library user 2.0, Librarian 2.0: innovative services for sustainable libraries. Computers in Libraries 29(10: 16–21.

36.

Radford

(1992) Positivism, Foucault, and the fantasia of the library: Conceptions of knowledge and the modern library experience. Library Quarterly 62(4): 408–424.

37.

Radford

(2001) Libraries, librarians, and the discourse of fear. Library Quarterly 71(3): 299–329.

38.

Rutherford

(2008) Implementing social software in public libraries. An exploration of the issues confronting public library adopters of social software. Library Hi Tech 26(2): 184–200.

39.

Sandberg

Pinnington

(2009) Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. Journal of Management Studies 46(7): 1138–1170.

40.

Santema

van de and Rijt

(2005) The valuation of resources: Looking through the eyes of the customer. In: Sanchez

Heene

(eds) Advances in Applied Business Strategy, Vol. 9. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 17–28.

41.

Sevón

(2007) Bibliotekarierollen i en ny utbildningsorganization. En studie av fyra yrkeshögskolor. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Förlag.

42.

Stephens

(2007) Modeling the Role of Blogging in Librarianship. Texas: University of North Texas. Available at: http://tametheweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/stephens-mfinal.pdf (accessed 2 August 2010).

43.

Stover

(2004) The reference librarian as non-expert: A postmodern approach to expertise. Reference Librarian 42(87): 273–300.

44.

Sundin

Hedman

(2005) Professions and occupational identities. In: Fisher

(ed.) Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 293–297.

45.

Torstensson

(2002) Libraries and society: The macrostructural aspect of library and information studies. Library Review 51(3/4): 211–220.

46.

Tuominen

(1997) User centered discourse: An analysis of the subject positions of the user and the librarian. Library Quarterly 67(4): 350–371.

47.

Wenger

(1999) Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.