This research highlights the status of the information technology (IT) skills and competencies being taught at LIS schools in the United States. Results list specific IT topics that the library schools are teaching and the ones that are missing from the curriculum. Based on a literature review these skills are then juxtaposed with the expectations of the employers as well as the graduates of these programs. This research was conducted in multiple steps, starting from extensive literature review, secondary data collection regarding courses from top LIS schools’ websites, identifying and creating an IT competency list, content analysis on the course names and descriptions in relation to IT competencies and recommendations for further improvement. In conclusion, some potential courses consisting of the lacking IT skills are proposed as a recommendation.
AdkinsDEsserL (2004) Literature and technology skills for entry-level children’s librarians. Children & Libraries: The Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children2: 14–21.
American Society for Information Science and Technology (2002) ASIST Educational Guidelines. Guidelines approved by the ASIST Board, 8November2001. Silver Spring, MA: American Society for Information Science and Technology. Available at: http://www.asis.org/Board/educational_guidelines.html (accessed 10 February 2011).
6.
Association for Library and Information Science Education (2005) Educating Library and Information Science Professionals for a New Century: The KAUPER Report. Chicago, IL: ALISE. Available at: http://alise.org/publications/kaliper.pdf (accessed 25 May 2005).
7.
BosqueDDLampertC (2009) A chance of storms: New librarians navigating technology tempests. Technical Services Quarterly26(4): 261–286. DOI: 10.1080/07317130802678878.
8.
CallisonDTilleyCL (2001) Descriptive impressions of the library and information education evolution of 1988–1998 as reflected in job announcements, ALISE descriptors and new course titles. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science42(3): 181–199.
9.
DillonANorrisA (2005) Crying wolf: An examination and reconsideration of the perception of crises in LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science46(4): 280–298.
10.
FeretBMarcinekM (2005) The future of the academic library and the academic librarian: A Delphi study reloaded. New Review of Information Networking11(1): 37–63.
11.
FesslerV (2007) The future of technical services (it’s not the technical services it was). Library Administration & Management21(3): 139–144.
Hall-EllisSD (2006) Cataloging electronic resources and metadata: Employers’ expectations as reflected in American Libraries and AutoCAT, 2000-2005. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science47(1): 38–51.
15.
HoltRE (2005) Shibboleth: A next-generation view of the MLS. Library Review54(9): 519–523.
16.
Houghton-JanS (2007) Technology competencies and training for libraries. Library Technology Reports43(2).
17.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2009) More About IFLA. The Hague, Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Available at: http://archive.ifla.org/III/intro00.htm (accessed 10 February 2011).
18.
JohnstonBWebberS (2004) The role of LIS faculty in the information literate university: Taking over the academy?New Library World105(1/2): 12–20.
19.
JonesDE (1988) ‘I’d like you to meet our new librarian’: The initiation and integration of the newly appointed librarian. Journal of Academic Librarianship14(4): 221–224.
20.
KeenanMAWillardPWilsonCS (2006) What do they want? A study of changing employer expectations of information professionals. Australian Academic Research Libraries37(1): 17–37.
21.
KwasikH (2002) Qualifications for a serials librarian in an electronic environment. Serials Review28(1): 33–37.
22.
LeckieGJGivenLMBuschmanJE (2010) Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited. Librarian Research Project 1.
23.
MarkeyK (2004). Current educational trends in the information and library science curriculum. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science45(4): 317–339.
24.
MehraBSanduskyRJ (2009) LIS students as community partners in elective courses: Applying community-based action research to meet the needs of underserved populations. In: RoyLJensenKMeyersAH (eds) Service Learning: Linking Library Education and Practice. Chicago, IL: American Library Association (ALA), pp.153–168.
25.
MehraBBlackKLeeS (2010a) Perspectives of East Tennessee’s rural public librarians about the need for professional library education: An exploratory study. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science51(3): 142–157.
26.
MehraBSinghVParrisH (2010b) Open source software collaborations in Tennessee’s regional library system: An exploratory study. Library Review59(9): 690–701.
27.
MyburghS (2003) Education directions for new information professionals. Australian Library Journal52(3): 213–227.
28.
NealD (2009) The library school’s role in preparing new librarians for working with technology. In: ThompsonSM (ed.) Core Technology Competencies for Librarians and Library Staff: A LITA Guide. New York: Neal-Schuman, pp.41–72.
29.
NeuendorfKA (2001) The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
NewhouseRSpisakA (2004) Fixing the first job: New librarians speak out on problems in the profession. Library Journal129: 44–46. Available at: http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA443916.html (accessed 25 April 2012).
31.
NofsingerMM (1999) Training and retraining reference professionals: Core competencies for the 21st century. Reference Librarian30(64): 9–19.
32.
PerryCA (2004) Information technology and the curriculum: A status report evaluating the trends and existing models of integrating technology across the curriculum can inform your campus. Educause Quarterly27(4): 28. Available at: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqmO444.pdf (accessed 13 July 2005).
33.
RubinRE (2004) Foundations of Library and Information Science. New York: Neal-Schuman.
34.
RubinR (2010) Foundations of Library and Information Science. 3rd edn.New York: Neal-Schuman.
35.
TammaroAM (2007) A curriculum for digital librarians: A reflection on the European debate. New Library World108(5/6): 229–246.
36.
TennantR (1998) The most important management decision: Hiring staff for the new millennium. Library Journal123: 102. Available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA156490.html (accessed 25 April 2012).
37.
TenopirC (2002) Educating tomorrow’s information professionals today. Searcher10(7): 12–16.
38.
ThompsonSM (2009) Core Technology Competencies for Librarians and Library Staff: A LITA Guide. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman.
WiegandWA (2003) To reposition a research agenda: What American studies can teach the LIS community about the library in the life of the user. Library Quarterly73(4): 369-382.
42.
XuHChenH (1999) What do employers expect? The educating systems librarian research project report 1. Electronic Library17(3): 171–179.
