This article elaborates four major issues hampering the sustainability of digital preservation within cultural heritage institutions: digitization, metadata indexes, intellectual property rights management and business models. Using a case-study approach, the digitization of audiovisual collections within the performing arts institutions in Flanders (Belgium) will be scrutinized, providing an overview of the state-of-the-art preservation and access. The analysis shows that digital preservation policies in most organizations are underdeveloped and that archives suffer from deterioration and technological obsolescence.
Addis M., Choi F. and Miller A. ( 2005) Planning the digitisation, storage and access of large scale audiovisual archives. Paper presented at Ensuring Long-term Preservation and Adding Value to Scientific and Technical Data, 21-23 November, The Royal Society, Edinburgh.
2.
Assmann I. ( 2003) When preservation is a virtue…. S. A. Archives Journal43: 24-33.
3.
Astle PJ and Muir A. ( 2002) Digitisation and preservation in public libraries and archives. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science34(2): 67-79.
4.
Besek JM, Coates J., Fitzgerald B., et al. (2008) Digital preservation and copyright: An international study. The International Journal of Digital Curation2(3): 103-111.
5.
Bishoff L. and Allen N. ( 2004) Business Planning for Cultural Heritage Institutions . Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
6.
Boudrez F., Dekeyser H. and Dumortier J. ( 2004) Digital Archiving: The New Challenge. Brussels: I.R.I.S. Group.
7.
CEC (2005) i2010: Digital Libraries . Brussels: Commission of the European Commission.
8.
Coyle K. ( 2005) Descriptive metadata for copyright status. First Monday10(10).
9.
Day M. ( 2001) Metadata in a nutshell. Information Europe6(2): 11.
10.
de Lucenet Y. and Wintermans V. ( 2007) Preserving the digital heritage: Principles and policies . Netherlands National Commission for UNESCO ( The Hague) and European Commission on Preservation and Access (Amsterdam).
11.
de Niet M., Heijmans L. and Verwayen H. ( 2009) Business Model Innovation Cultural Heritage. Amsterdam: Knowledgeland.
12.
Edmonson R. ( 2004) Audiovisual Archiving: Philosophy and Principles . Paris: UNESCO.
13.
Elings MW and Waibel G. ( 2007) Metadata for all: Descriptive standards and metadata sharing across libraries, archives and museums. First Monday12(3).
14.
Garcelon M. ( 2009) An information commons? Creative Commons and public access to cultural creations. New Media and Society11(8): 1307-1326.
15.
Granger S. ( 2000) Emulation as a digital preservation strategy. D-Lib Magazine6(10).
16.
Greenberg J., Spurgin K. and Crystal A. ( 2006) Functionalities for automatic metadata generation applications: A survey of metadata experts’ opinions. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies1(1): 3-20.
17.
Hammond M. and Davis C. ( 2009) Understanding the Costs of Digitisation: Detail report . Guiltford: Curtis+Cartwright Consulting.
18.
Hauttekeete L., Evens T., Mechant P., et al. (2009) Unlocking cultural heritage: A bottom-up approach. In: Sapio B, Haddon L, Mante-Meijer E , et al. (eds) The Good, The Bad, The Challenging. The User and the Future of Information and Communication Technologies. Koper: ABS-Center, 367-375.
19.
Kaul H. ( 2006) Organising digital collections: Problems and issues . Sri Lankan Journal of Librarianship and Information Management2(1): 11-21.
20.
Kim H.-L, Decker S. and Breslin JG ( 2010) Representing and sharing folksonomies with semantics . Journal of Information Science36(1): 57-72.
21.
Lavoie B. and Dempsey L. ( 2004) Thirteen ways of looking at… digital preservation . D-Lib Magazine10(7-8).
22.
Lessig L. ( 2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin.
23.
Manzhukh Z. ( 2003) Commercial exploitation of cultural heritage in memory institutions. Paper presented at INFORUM: 9th Conference on Professional Information Resources, 27-29 May, Czech Republic, Prague.
24.
Muir A. ( 2004) Digital preservation: Awareness, responsibility and right issues. Journal of Information Science30(1): 73-92.
25.
Muir A. ( 2006) Preservation, Access and Intellectual Property Rights Challenges for Libraries in the Digital Environment. London : Institute for Public Policy Research.
26.
Navarrete HT ( 2009) Digital heritage in the Netherlands: Notes on the production, expenditure and availability survey. Paper presented at the Museum Computer Network Conference, 11-14 November , Oregon, USA.
27.
Navarrete HT and Huysmans F. ( 2009) Digital cultural heritage in the Netherlands: collecting statistics on production, investments and use. Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 75the IFLA General Conference and Assembly, 23-27 August, Milan, Italy.
28.
Niso (2004) Understanding Metadata. Baltimore, MD: N ISO Press.
29.
Ooghe B. and Moreels D. ( 2009) Analyzing selection for digitisation. Current practices and common incentives. D-Lib Magazine15(9/10).
30.
Osterwalder A. and Pigneur Y. ( 2009) Business Model Generation. Self-published .
31.
Robrechts T. and Kerremans R. ( 2009) How to contract with right holders? A legal analysis . In: Evens T and Moreels D (eds) Access to Archives of Performing Arts Multimedia . Brussels: VTi / IBBT, 75-94.
32.
Ross S. and Hedstrom M. ( 2005) Preservation research and sustainable digital libraries . International Journal of Digital Libraries5(4): 317-324.
33.
Rothenberg J. ( 1999) Avoiding Technological Quicksand: Finding a Viable Technical Foundation for Digital Preservation. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources .
34.
Tanner S. and Deegan M. ( 2003) Exploring charging models for digital cultural heritage in Europe. D-Lib Magazine9(5).
35.
Taylor C. ( 2003) An introduction to metadata. Available at: http://www.library.uq.edu.au/iad/ctmeta4.html.
36.
Van de Walle R. and Van Peteghem S. ( 2009) (Meta)datastandaarden voor digitale archieven. Gent: Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent.
37.
Van der Hoeven J., Lohman B. and Verdegem R. ( 2007) Emulation for digital preservation in practice: The results . The International Journal of Digital Curation2(2): 123-132.
38.
van Hooland S. ( 2006) Spectator becomes annotator: Possibilities offered by user-generated metadata for image databases. Paper presented at the CILIP Conference, 13-15 September, University of East Anglia, UK.
39.
Van Suchodoletz D. and van der Hoeven J. ( 2009) Emulation: From digital artefact to remotely rendered environments. The International Journal of Digital Curation3(4): 146-155.
