This research examines the level of information literacy skills in high school teachers and the extent of information literacy instruction in the western province of Thessaloniki. A census survey was conducted, which resulted in 500 structured questionnaires that were processed and analysed statistically using multivariate methods. The findings indicated that most of the teachers did not use any electronic sources, especially e-sources, and they were probably poor at helping children attain a level of information literacy. It was also found that men, teachers with a Masters or a PhD and teachers with less working experience were more likely to be frequent users of sources and especially e-sources. Therefore, it is suggested that teachers should attend information literacy training seminars.
Applebee A., Clayton P. and Pascoe C. ( 1997) Australian academic use of the Internet. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy7(2): 85-94.
2.
Applebee A., Clayton P., Pascoe C. and Bruce H. ( 2000) Australian academic use of the Internet: Implications for university administrators. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy10(2): 141-149.
3.
Asselin M. ( 2005) Teaching information skills in the information age: An examination of trends in the middle grades. School Libraries Worldwide11(1): 17-36.
Boekhorst AK ( 2003) Becoming information literate in the Netherlands . Library Review52(7): 298-309.
6.
Branch J. ( 2002) Helping students become better electronic searchers . Teacher Librarian30(1): 14-18.
7.
Burhanna KJ and Jensen ML ( 2006) Collaborations for success: High school to college transitions . Reference Services Review34(4): 509-519.
8.
Busselle R., Reagan J., Pinkleton B. and Jackson K. ( 1999) Factors affecting Internet use in a saturated-access population . Telematics and Informatics16(1-2): 45-58.
9.
Campello B. and Goncalves Abreu VLF ( 2005) Information literacy and the education of school librarians . School Libraries Worldwide11(1): 37-52.
10.
Cheong WH ( 2002) Internet adoption in Macao. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication7(2). Available at: http://www.3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/120837838/HTMLSTART (accessed June 2009).
11.
Chou C. ( 2003) Incidences and correlates of Internet anxiety among high school teachers in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior19(6): 731-749.
12.
Clausen SE ( 1998) Applied Correspondence Analysis: An Introduction . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Davis-Kahl S. and Payne L. ( 2003) Teaching, learning and research: Linking high school teachers to information literacy. Reference Services Review31(4): 313-319.
14.
Ercegovac Z. ( 2003) Bridging the knowledge gap between secondary and higher education. College & Research Libraries64(1): 75-85.
15.
Gibson S. and Oberg D. ( 2004) Visions and realities of Internet use in schools: Canadian perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology35(5): 569-585.
16.
Greenacre M. ( 1993) Correspondence Analysis in Practice. London: Academic Press.
17.
Greenacre MJ and Blasius J (eds) (1994) Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences: Recent Developments and Applications. London: Academic Press.
18.
Herring JE ( 2006) Critical investigation of students’ and teachers’ views of the use of information literacy skills in school assignments. American Library Association. Available at: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/aaslpubsandjournals/slmrb/slmrcontents/volume9/informationliteracy.cfm (accessed June 2009).
19.
Heimlich JE ( 2003) Environmental educators on the Web: Results of a national study of users and nonusers’. Journal of Environmental Education34(3): 4-11.
20.
Korobili S., Tilikidou I. and Delistavrou A. ( 2006) Factors that influence the use of library resources by faculty members. Library Review55(2): 91-105.
21.
Lebart L., Morineau A. and Warwick KM ( 1984) Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis: Correspondence Analysis and Related Techniques for Large Matrices. New York: John Wiley.
22.
McLelland D. and Crawford J. ( 2004) The Drumchapel Project: A study of ICT usage by school pupils and teachers in a secondary school in a deprived area of Glasgow . Journal of Librarianship and Information Science36(2): 55-67.
23.
Malliari A. ( 2005) Information retrieval from academic libraries’ automated systems and statistical analysis. Doctoral thesis , University of Macedonia. [In Greek]
24.
Markos A., Menexes G. and Papadimitriou I. ( 2009) The CHIC analysis software v1.0. In: Locarek-Junge H and Weihs C (eds) Classification as a Tool for Research: Proceedings of the 11th IFCS Biennial Conference of the Gesellscaft für Klassifikation 13-18 March, Dresden. Berlin: Springer, 409-416.
25.
Merchant L. and Hepworth M. ( 2002) Information literacy of teachers and pupils in secondary schools. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science34(2): 81-89.
26.
Mokhtar IA and Majid S. ( 2006) An exploratory study of the collaborative relationship between teachers and librarians in Singapore primary and secondary schools . Library & Information Science Research28(2): 265-280.
27.
Neuman D. ( 2003) Research in school library media for the next decade: Polishing the diamond. Library Trends51(4): 503-524.
28.
Oberg D., Hay L. and Henri J. ( 2000) The role of the principal in an information literate school community: Cross-country comparisons from an international research project . School Library Media Research9(3). Available at: http://www.light-house.fi/pdfs/alabam4.pdf (accessed June 2009).
29.
Probert E.(2009) Information literacy skills: Teacher understandings and practice . Computers & Education53(1): 24-33.
30.
Teo TSH ( 2001) Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy11(2): 125-137.
31.
Virkus S. ( 2003) Information literacy in Europe: A literature review . Information Research8(4), paper no. 159. Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper159.html (accessed June 2009).
32.
Williams D. and Coles L. ( 2007) Teachers’ approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective. Educational Research49(2): 185-206.
