The key for students of today to become independent learners and knowledge workers of tomorrow lies in being information literate. However, existing information literacy (IL) teaching approaches have not always been successful in equipping students with these crucial skills to ensure deep erudition and long-lasting retention. Hence, sound pedagogical approaches become critical in IL education. This research hypothesizes that students grasp IL skills more effectively when their innate interests, such as that determined by their respective dominant intelligences, are stimulated and applied to their work. Consequently, they would produce work of better quality. To verify these postulations, an IL course was designed for students undertaking project work to equip them with the necessary IL skills, by using an established pedagogical approach — Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. Subsequently the quality of students' project work between the experimental and control groups were compared. It was found that the performance of students who had undergone IL training through the application of learning styles was superior in their project work.
American Library Association (ALA) (1989) Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final report. Washington, D C, January 10, para. 3, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential.htm
2.
Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bell, S.J. (2004) `The Infodiet: How Libraries can Offer an Appetizing Alternative to Google', Chronicle of Higher Education50 (24): B15.
4.
Bowler, L., Large, A. and Rejskind, G. (2001) `Primary School Students, Information Literacy and the Web', Education for Information19 (3): 201-24.
5.
Brown, C., Murphy, T.J. and Nanny, M. (2003) `Turning Techno-savvy into Info-savvy: Authentically Integrating Information Literacy into the College Curriculum', Journal of Academic Librarianship29 (6): 389-98.
6.
Bruce, C.S. (1997) Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide, South Australia: AUSLIB Press.
7.
Bruce, C.S. (2002) `Information Literacy as a Catalyst for Educational Change: A Background Paper. White Paper'. prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy. Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Republic, July 2002, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/bruce-fullpaper.pdf
8.
Bruner, J. (1977) The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Chard, S. (2001) Project Approach in Early Childhood and Elementary Education. Project Approach, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.project-approach.com/foundation/learning.htm
10.
Cognard, A. (2004) `Cognard's Philosophy: Find the "Ah" Moment', USA Today. 10 June.
11.
Feuerstein, R. (1980) Instrumental Enrichment: An Intervention Program for Cognitive Modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
12.
Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. NYBasic Books.
13.
Gardner, H. (1993) Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice . NY: Basic Books.
14.
Grafstein, A. (2002) `A Discipline-based Approach to Information Literacy' , Journal of Academic Librarianship28 (4): 197-204.
15.
Grant, M.M. (2002) `Getting a Grip on Project-based Learning: Theory, Cases and Recommendations'. Meridian 5 (1), URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2002/514/
16.
Hampton, D.R., Summer, C.E. and Webber, R.A. (1987) Organizational Behavior and the Practice of Management . Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman .
17.
Hart, G. (2000) `Project Work as a Vehicle for Information Literacy Education in a Circuit of South African Primary Schools'. 66th IFLA Council and General Conference, Jerusalem, Israel, August 13-18, 2000, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/074-133e.htm
18.
Heil, D. (2005) `The Internet and Student Research: Teaching Critical Evaluation Skills', Teacher Librarian33 (2): 26-9.
19.
Hickey, G.M. (2004) `"Can I pick more than one project?" - Case Studies of Five Teachers who used MI-based Instructional Planning', Teachers College Record106 (1): 77-86.
20.
Jacobson, T.E. and Mark, B.L. (2000) `Separating Wheat from Chaff: Helping First Year Students Become Information Savvy', Journal of General Education49 (4): 256-78.
21.
Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E. and Veenstra, C. (1999) `How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams', Journal of Management25: 117-41.
22.
Jehn, K.A. (1995) `A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict', Administrative Science Quarterly40: 530-57.
23.
Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, Gregory B. and Neale, Margaret A. (1999) `Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups ', Administrative Science Quarterly44: 741-63.
24.
Julien, H. and Boon, S. (2002) `From the Front Line: Information Literacy Instruction in Canadian Academic Libraries', Reference Services Review30 (2): 143-9.
25.
Kasowitz-Scheer, A. and Pasqualoni, M. (2002) Information Literacy Instruction in Higher Education: Trends and Issues. ERIC Digest. Syracuse, NY: ERIClearinghouse on Information and Technology (ED 465375).
26.
Lance, K.C. (2001) Proof of the Power: Recent Research on the Impact of School Library Media Programs on the Academic Achievement of US Public School Students. ERIC Digest, Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology (ED 456861).
27.
MacDonald, M.C., Rathemacher, A.J. and Burkhardt, J.M. (2000) `Challenges in Building an Incremental Multi-year Information Literacy plan', Reference Services Review (28) 3: 240-7.
28.
Markuson, C. (1996) From Clay to Copper, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.sirs.com/corporate/newsletters/link/linksp96.htm
29.
Maslow, A. (1943) `A Theory of Human Motivation', Psychological Review50 (4): 370-96.
30.
Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE) (1997 a) Information Literacy Guidelines. Languages and Library Branch, Curriculum Planning and Development Division. Singapore : Ministry of Education.
31.
Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE) (1997 b) Information Literacy Supplementary Materials. Languages and Library Branch, Curriculum Planning and Development Division. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
32.
Ministry of Education, Singapore (MOE) (1997 c) The Extensive Reading and Information Literacy (ERIL) Programme. Languages and Library Branch, Curriculum Planning and Development Division . Singapore: Ministry of Education .
33.
Moore, A.C. (2001) The impact of hands-on information literacy instruction on learning/knowledge of information literacy concepts and mastery of the research process in college courses: A quasi-experimental study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
34.
Moore, P. (2002) `An Analysis of Information Literacy Education Worldwide'. White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy. Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Republic, July 2002, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.nclis . gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/moore-full-paper.pdf
35.
Moore, S. (1991) `Understanding and Managing Diversity among Groups at Work: Key Issues for Organisational Training and Development', Journal of European Industrial Training23 (4-5): 208-17.
36.
NSW Department of Education and Training ( 2002) Multiple Intelligences. Inform, October 2002, URL (consulted May 2007): https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/inform/yr2002/oct/multiple.htm
37.
Orr, D., Appleton, M. and Wallin, M. (2001) `Information Literacy and Flexible Delivery: Creating a Conceptual Framework and Model', Journal of Academic Librarianship27 (6): 457-63.
38.
O'Sullivan, C. (2002) `Is Information Literacy Relevant in the Real World? ', Reference Services Review30 (1): 7-14.
39.
Pech, R.J. (2001) `Termites, Group Behaviour, and the Loss of Innovation: Conformity Rules', Journal of Managerial Psychology16 (7): 559-74.
40.
Pelled, L.H., Eisenhardt, K.M. and Xin, K.R. (1999) `Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance', Administrative Science Quarterly44: 1-28.
41.
Piaget, J. (1929) The Child's Conception of the World. NYHarcourt Brace Jovanovich.
42.
Rader, H.B. (2002) `Information Literacy - an Emerging Global Priority.' White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy. Information Literacy Meeting of Experts, Prague, The Czech Republic, July 2002, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.nclis. gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/raderfullpaper.pdf
43.
Rockman, I.F. (2003) `Information Literacy, a Worldwide Priority for the Twenty-first Century', Reference Services Review31 (3): 209-10.
44.
Scott, K.J. and Plourde, L.A. (2007) `School Libraries and Increased Student Achievement: What's the Big Idea?', Education127 (3): 419-29.
45.
Skinner, B.F. (1938) The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis . New York: Appleton-Century.
46.
Slavin, R.E. (1995) `Enhancing Intergroup Relations in Schools: Cooperative Learning and Other Strategies', in W.D. Hawley and A.W. Wells (eds) Toward a Common Destiny: Improving Race and Ethnic Relations in America , pp. 291-314. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
Smith, M.K. (1999) `Learning Theory'. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education (infed), URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-learn.htm.
48.
Spitzer, K.S., Eisenberg, M.B. and Lowe, C.A. (1998) Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. ERIC Digest. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology (ED 427780).
49.
Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E. and Dutton, J.E. (1981) `Threat-rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis', Administrative Science Quarterly26: 501-24.
50.
Stoffle, C.J. (1998) `Literacy 101 for the Digital Age', American Libraries29 (11): 46-8.
51.
Timpson, W.M., Winokur, M.A. and Merline, A.M. (2002) `Skills for Success in College: What Students Need from High School', International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning 6 (4), URL (consulted May 2007):http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/volume6/timpson.html#exploring
52.
United States Department of Education (1983 ) A Nation at Risk. National Commission on Excellence in Education, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html
53.
Virkus, S. (2003) `Information Literacy in Europe: A Literature Review ', Information Research8 (4), paper no. 159, URL (consulted May 2007 ): http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper159.html
54.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
Watson, J.B. (1913) `Psychology as the Behaviourist Views it', Psychological Review20: 158-77.
56.
Webber, S. and Johnston, B. (2000) `Conceptions of Information Literacy: New Perspectives and Implications', Journal of Information Science26 (6): 381-97.
57.
Whitehead, M.J. and Quinlan, C.A. (2003) `Information Literacy in Higher Education', Feliciter1: 22-4.
58.
Yeap, L.L., Myint, S.K., Lim, L.H. and Low, G.T. (2005) To Empower, be Empowered. Singapore : McGraw-Hill Education (Asia).
59.
Zurkowski, P.G. (1974) The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities. Washington DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Sciences (Paper No. 5, p. 6) (ED100391).
