Considers the historic and contemporary import of Pierce Butler’s An Introduction to Library Science. Characterizes the content of each chapter and critically analyses the central theses. Relates Butler’s positivistic premises, assumptions and conclusions to the congeries of competing epistemological and ideological standpoints that defines current thinking in library and information science research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, A. (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: Chicago University Press .
2.
Abbott, A. (1999) Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: Chicago University Press .
3.
Ayer, A.J. (1946) Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover .
4.
Berelson, B. (1949) The Library’s Public. New York: Columbia University Press .
5.
Buckland, M. (1996) ‘Documentation, Information Science, and Library Science in the U.S.A’ , Information Processing & Management, 32 (1): 63-76 .
6.
Budd, J.M. (1995) ‘An Epistemological Foundation for Library and Information Science’ , Library Quarterly, 65 (3): 295-318 .
7.
Butler, P. (1933) Introduction to Library Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press . [Reprinted in Richardson (1992)]
8.
International Journal of Information and Library Research, 5 (1): 61-63 .
9.
Cronin, B. (1995) ‘Shibboleth and Substance in North American Library and Information Science Education’ , Libri, 45 (1): 45-63 .
10.
Cronin, B. (2005) ‘An I-dentity Crisis? The Information Schools Movement’ , International Journal of Information Management, 25 (1): (in press).
11.
Cronin, B. and Davenport, E. (1988) Post-Professionalism: Transforming the Information Heartland. London: Aslib .
12.
Cronin, B. and Pearson, S. (1990) ‘The Export of Ideas from Information Science’ , Journal of Information Science, 16 (6): 381-391 .
13.
Day, R. (1996) ‘LIS, Method and Postmodern Science’ , Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 37 (4): 317-324 .
14.
Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press .
15.
Eagleton, T. (1983) Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
16.
Egan, M. and Shera, J. (1952) ‘Foundations of a Theory of Bibliography’ , Library Quarterly, 22 (2): 125-137 .
17.
Furner, J. (2003) ‘Little Book, Big Book: Before and After Little Science, Big Science: A Review Article, Part I’ , Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35 (2): 115-125 .
18.
Gross, P. R. and Levitt, N. (1998) Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
19.
Hacking, I. (1999) The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
20.
Harris, M.A. and Hannah, S.A. (1993) Into the Future: The Foundations of Library and Information Services in the Post-Industrial Era. Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
21.
Hjørland, B. (2000) ‘Documents, Memory Institutions and Information Science’ , Journal of Documentation, 56 (1): 27-41 .
22.
Learned, W.S. (1924) The American Public Library and the Diffusion of Knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace .
23.
Merton, R.K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
24.
Miyamoto, S. , Midorikawa, N. and Nakayama, K. (1990) ‘A View of Studies on Bibliometrics and Related Subjects in Japan’, in C.L. Borgman (ed.) Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics: 73-83. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
25.
Monk, R. (1990) Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Penguin .
26.
Morse, P.M. (1968) Library Effectiveness: A Systems Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
27.
Plaiss, M. (1990) ‘Libraryland: Pseudo-intellectuals and Dullards’ , American Libraries, 21: 588-589 .
28.
Radford, G.P. (1992) ‘Positivism, Foucault, and the Fantasia of the Library: Conceptions of Knowledge and the Modern Library Experience’ , Library Quarterly, 62 (4): 408-424 .
29.
Ranganathan, S.R. (1957) The Five Laws of Library Science. London: Blunt .
30.
Richardson, J.V. (1992) The Gospel of Scholarship: Pierce Butler and a Critique of American Librarianship. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow .
31.
Sandstrom, A.R. and Sandstrom, P.E. (1995) ‘The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research’ , Library Quarterly, 65 (2): 161-199 .
32.
Totterdell, B. and Bird, J. (1976) The Effective Library: A Report of the Hillingdon Project on Public Library Effectiveness. London: Library Association .
33.
Van House, N. (2004) ‘Science and Technology Studies and Information Studies’, in B. Cronin (ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38: 3-86. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
34.
Weber, M. (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribner . [Trans. T. Parsons]
