Calabrese EJ.Expanding the RfD concept to incorporate and optimize beneficial effects while preventing toxic responses from non-essential toxicants . BELLE Newsletter1996; 4: 1-10 .
2.
Gaylor D.Safety assessment with hormetic effects . BELLE Newsletter1998; 6: 6-8 .
3.
US EPA . Proposed Guidelines for Neurotoxicity Risk Assessment . Federal Register (Oct. 4) 1995; 60: 52032-52056 .
4.
Davis JM , Svendsgaard DJ.U-shaped dose-response curves: their occurrence and implication for risk assessment . J Toxical Environ Health1990; 30: 71-83 .
5.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LA.A general classification of U-shaped dose-response relationships in toxicology and their mechanistic foundations . Hum Exp Toxicol1998; in press
6.
Swenberg JA , Dietrich DR , McClain RM , Cohen SM.Species-specific mechanisms of carcinogenesis. In: Mechanisms of Carcinogensis in Risk AssessmentVainio Het al. (eds), IARC, Lyon, France , 1992; pp. 477-500.
7.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LA.The dose determines the stimulation (and poison): development of a chemical hormesis database . Int J Toxicol1997; 15: 545-559 .
8.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LA.A quantitatively-based methodology for the evaluation of chemical hormesis . Hum Ecol Risk Assess1997a; 3: 545-554 .
9.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LA.Can the concept of hormesis be generalized to carcinogensis?Reg Toxicol Pharmacol1998; Submitted.
10.
Sielken Jr RL , Stevenson DE.Some implications for quantitative risk assessment if hormesis exists . BELLE Newsletter1998; 6: 13-17 .
